iMtG Server: Gathering

Magic (The Gathering) => Discussion => Topic started by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on February 08, 2015, 01:16:45 PM

Title: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on February 08, 2015, 01:16:45 PM
It's the last core set, here is what we know:

Spoilers: http://mythicspoiler.com/ori/index.html

Announcement Link: http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/arcana/announcing-magic-origins-2015-02-08

(https://41.media.tumblr.com/a81e6433bc9caf7985c6709690bec333/tumblr_njgtbdoruD1tophcho2_540.png)
(https://40.media.tumblr.com/7425faaaade42a05b135bb0fb6fabb23/tumblr_njgtbdoruD1tophcho5_540.png)
(https://40.media.tumblr.com/68314fbf75a085c81f4918e2ba33900c/tumblr_njgtct8CMv1tophcho1_540.png)
(https://40.media.tumblr.com/0972284acd0d16fc9b7068fdc676d68a/tumblr_njgtct8CMv1tophcho2_r1_540.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/Cj2HIz0.jpg)

Lily, Jace, Gideon, Nissa, and Chandra confirmed, also 2 new mechanics, at least one of which involves planeswalker sparks in some way
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: the_intelligentleman on February 08, 2015, 01:21:21 PM
LILLY REPRINT CONFIRMED
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on February 08, 2015, 01:35:24 PM
I'm sooo .loving. excited!!!!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: the_intelligentleman on February 08, 2015, 01:37:56 PM
JTMS REPRINT CONFIRMED
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on February 08, 2015, 01:38:15 PM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on February 08, 2015, 01:37:56 PM
JTMS REPRINT CONFIRMED

No way? Really?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Rass on February 08, 2015, 01:54:46 PM
 {Island}  REPRINT CONFIRMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on February 08, 2015, 01:58:15 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on February 08, 2015, 01:38:15 PM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on February 08, 2015, 01:37:56 PM
JTMS REPRINT CONFIRMED

No way? Really?
No
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on February 08, 2015, 02:33:25 PM
It's origins. Like, actual origins. Look how young Jace is!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on February 08, 2015, 02:39:12 PM
Love the concept, lets hope of the veil isn't reprinted that fast. Current standard would be OP for bug walkers if we had of the veil and vess
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on February 08, 2015, 02:41:24 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on February 08, 2015, 02:39:12 PM
Love the concept, lets hope of the veil isn't reprinted that fast. Current standard would be OP for bug walkers if we had of the veil and vess

I'm all for BUG walkers being OP...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on February 08, 2015, 02:44:32 PM
Nah cuz then everyone plays my deck :P

I played a mirror recently and he was just piloting the scg winner deck. My build rocked his ;)

Oh and the whole bug walkers deck is rising, deck went from 350 avg to 425 avg! That's not even counting swag factor
{ashiok nightmare weaver}
{thoughtseize}
{liliana Vess}
{ugin spirit dragon}
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on February 08, 2015, 02:46:33 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on February 08, 2015, 02:44:32 PM
Nah cuz then everyone plays my deck :P

I played a mirror recently and he was just piloting the scg winner deck. My build rocked his ;)

Oh and the whole bug walkers deck is rising, deck went from 350 avg to 425 avg! That's not even counting swag factor
{ashiok nightmare weaver}
{thoughtseize}
{liliana Vess}
{ugin spirit dragon}

I've been playing your list on Untap. I quite like it.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on February 08, 2015, 02:48:17 PM
Awesome!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on February 08, 2015, 03:10:12 PM
Here is the announcement link, it is also in the OP: http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/arcana/announcing-magic-origins-2015-02-08
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Bookmeister on February 08, 2015, 03:10:15 PM
Lily, Jace, Chandra, Gideon, and Nissa are all going to be printed as non-PW. But judging from the spoiled Lily art they might print both.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: the_intelligentleman on February 08, 2015, 03:39:00 PM
What if we got a JTMS reprint AND a lily reprint. *shivers*
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Aladormax on February 08, 2015, 03:39:45 PM
If that happens I may go for broke and buy a case
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on February 08, 2015, 04:19:09 PM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on February 08, 2015, 03:39:00 PM
What if we got a JTMS reprint AND a lily reprint. *shivers*
If that happens, do you think packs would go for MSRP then?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on February 08, 2015, 04:22:07 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on February 08, 2015, 04:19:09 PM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on February 08, 2015, 03:39:00 PM
What if we got a JTMS reprint AND a lily reprint. *shivers*
If that happens, do you think packs would go for MSRP then?
Yes. Magic: Origins is a regular set, it doesn't have a restricted supply like Modern Masters and stores wouldn't be able to successfully increase the price because you could always just go to a Big Box store and get them. That said, there is approximately a .001% chance JTMS ending up this set.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MarduArrow on February 08, 2015, 05:20:27 PM
Oooh releases on my birthday
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on February 08, 2015, 05:24:55 PM
Quote from: bravado883 on February 08, 2015, 04:41:46 PM
The girl in the white dress has to be Elspeth right?
Nope, as GlowackAttack pointed out, it is Liliana before she got her spark (and presumably before she sold her soul to demons), and when she was a healer.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: NyghtHawk on February 08, 2015, 05:42:12 PM
I highly doubt you'll see a {Liliana of the Veil} reprint here with it being an origin story.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Thetrufflehunter on February 08, 2015, 05:43:18 PM
I really like he set symbol 😜
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Rasser on February 08, 2015, 05:57:42 PM
May be the "spark" ability will let you search your library or other zones for a PW of same name.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: lotrwk on February 08, 2015, 10:44:45 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 08, 2015, 05:18:57 PM
Also, the two images of "elspeth" and Lilian are actually 2 pictures of liliana, it's before she died or whatever and after Hence the reasoning for her Origins


oh my lord. They're gonna be flip csrds. Starting as legendaries, and then they flip into PWs!!!! The mechanics will be along the lines of "if you control a planeswalker... so and such" , much like lieutenant.
My guess is probably not. It is still a core set, so they do still want to keep things relatively simple. Although I do hope I'm wrong
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on February 08, 2015, 10:45:44 PM
I agree with the Legendary creature then flip concept. But unless I'm wrong Chandra had no powers until she awakened her spark... Other note, if it's a legendary creature then flip, they're all going to be EDH legal and expand on the PW commanders.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: NovusOrbis on February 08, 2015, 10:56:23 PM
This is just... Amazing
I'm so stoked
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on February 09, 2015, 06:31:54 AM
Since it's Origins... Yawgmoth!!!! Bring it!!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: blackychan1 on February 09, 2015, 01:41:13 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on February 09, 2015, 06:31:54 AM
Since it's Origins... Yawgmoth!!!! Bring it!!!
Vs Urza, Planeswalker!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on February 09, 2015, 04:45:09 PM
The only thing is, is that if they printed Urza he'd have to be 15 mana ... Bc he's way too powerful for anything
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on February 09, 2015, 05:11:49 PM
I think after ugin we are all down for a crazy cmc PW
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on February 09, 2015, 05:26:36 PM
+1 create a 2/2 artifact token, it has flying
+1 target permanent is now artifact, permanents with shroud and Hexproof may be targeted by this effect
-4 Exile all artifacts
-9 Exile all permanents other than urza from the battlefield, at the end of each turn, return a permanent exiled by Urza back to the battlefield under your control, it is also an artifact.

That would be fun :)
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on February 09, 2015, 05:44:57 PM
I think it's just going to be origin of the five Lorwyn pw

But you guys are missing one thing

If it's the origin of these particular pw than this set is most likely pre mending
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: lotrwk on February 09, 2015, 10:20:58 PM
Quote from: DirtyMustachio on February 09, 2015, 05:44:57 PM
I think it's just going to be origin of the five Lorwyn pw

But you guys are missing one thing

If it's the origin of these particular pw than this set is most likely pre mending
The five walkers are gideon, nissa, liliana, jace, and chandra
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on February 09, 2015, 10:52:37 PM
Okay so... Minus... Garruk and ajani lol, still gotta be pre mending
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: NovusOrbis on February 10, 2015, 12:04:56 AM
You know what would be so janky but so cool? Legendary creature forms of Jace, Lily, and such that flip to their planes walker form like the mechanic in Innistrad.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Estel2931 on February 10, 2015, 12:36:16 AM
Quote from: Taysby on February 10, 2015, 12:22:03 AM
So since its origins... P9 reprint confirmed!

One could wish lol
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on February 10, 2015, 04:53:21 AM
Quote from: Taysby on February 10, 2015, 12:22:03 AM
So since its origins... P9 reprint confirmed!
Before it was p9

White lotus {1}

{W} Sacrifice white lotus, add 3 colorless to your mana pool


Unpolished Emerald {G}
{T} to add {1} to your mana pool
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Popper23345 on February 10, 2015, 10:05:11 AM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on February 10, 2015, 04:53:21 AM
Quote from: Taysby on February 10, 2015, 12:22:03 AM
So since its origins... P9 reprint confirmed!
Before it was p9

White lotus {1}

{W} Sacrifice white lotus, add 3 colorless to your mana pool


Unpolished Emerald {G}
{T} to add {1} to your mana pool

"Shut up and take my money!"
:P
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on February 12, 2015, 02:13:09 PM
Ew Gideon
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Avnger345 on February 12, 2015, 03:57:46 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 12, 2015, 08:58:45 AM
5 confirmed walkers are Gideon, Jace. Liliana, Chandra, nissa. not lorwyn 5

These 5 go with the board game that's coming out too. 

Isn't it ironic. 
Don't you think.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Spikepit on February 12, 2015, 06:39:43 PM
Cool, I might actually get a {Nissa Revane} Finally. Lol
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on February 12, 2015, 07:04:23 PM
Quote from: Spikepit on February 12, 2015, 06:39:43 PM
Cool, I might actually get a {Nissa Revane} Finally. Lol
Oh god no. That has to be in the bottom 2 planeswalkers ever, just barely ahead of (or maybe even behind) {Tibalt, the Fiend-Blooded}.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Spikepit on February 12, 2015, 07:06:11 PM
Why do you think it irks me that I don't have one yet! Lol
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Skullguy725 on February 12, 2015, 07:14:48 PM
Anyone else here think {Birds of paradise} needs to be printed in standard?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on February 12, 2015, 09:42:11 PM
Quote from: Skullguy725 on February 12, 2015, 07:14:48 PM
Anyone else here think {Birds of paradise} needs to be printed in standard?

No. Not in any which way shape or form. {Birds of Paradise} is arguably the best mana dork ever.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on February 12, 2015, 09:49:24 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on February 12, 2015, 09:42:11 PM
Quote from: Skullguy725 on February 12, 2015, 07:14:48 PM
Anyone else here think {Birds of paradise} needs to be printed in standard?

No. Not in any which way shape or form. {Birds of Paradise} is arguably the best mana dork ever.
Yep, Wizards, in their crusade to make standard horrible and add no good cards to any other format, has deemed that one drop mana dorks are too strong and from now on they are aiming for two mana dorks with an upside instead, see {Sylvan Caryatid} and {Whisperer of the Wilds}. (This isn't made up just so I can rant about Wizards, Mark said this himself (in different words of course)).
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on February 12, 2015, 10:06:25 PM
Quote from: Spikepit on February 12, 2015, 07:06:11 PM
Why do you think it irks me that I don't have one yet! Lol

I got a zen one available boobies and all
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on February 12, 2015, 10:17:48 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on February 12, 2015, 10:06:25 PM
Quote from: Spikepit on February 12, 2015, 07:06:11 PM
Why do you think it irks me that I don't have one yet! Lol

I got a zen one available boobies and all
Damn American censorship!!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Skullguy725 on February 13, 2015, 12:44:59 PM
Quote from: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on February 12, 2015, 09:49:24 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on February 12, 2015, 09:42:11 PM
Quote from: Skullguy725 on February 12, 2015, 07:14:48 PM
Anyone else here think {Birds of paradise} needs to be printed in standard?

No. Not in any which way shape or form. {Birds of Paradise} is arguably the best mana dork ever.
Yep, Wizards, in their crusade to make standard horrible and add no good cards to any other format, has deemed that one drop mana dorks are too strong and from now on they are aiming for two mana dorks with an upside instead, see {Sylvan Caryatid} and {Whisperer of the Wilds}. (This isn't made up just so I can rant about Wizards, Mark said this himself (in different words of course)).

I mean, what's the worst it will do to the meta? Make green ramp a little more diverse?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on February 13, 2015, 02:10:40 PM
What is everything with this time change on Tarkir effected everything in the Multiverse? Where everything got flipped upside down? Could be the Origin of an entirely new multiverse....
Just my thought
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Estel2931 on February 13, 2015, 02:57:59 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on February 13, 2015, 02:52:09 PM
So the Lorwyn 5
Jace
Liliana
Chandra
Garruk (no longer veil cursed???)
Ajani

Wait, no, here is my thought, when they first debuted the board game last year they did not show the white walker, now is the because at the time they did not know who it was to be?
The Lorwyn 5 would make it Ajani, some speculated the return of Elspeth, but Gideon? Why Gideon????
What makes Gideon the choice for a white Walker other than the one off comment that people had trouble identifying with him because he is not human?

That is my question...

I read something on Quiet Speculation about Nissa and Gideon being in the set...they didn't go into much detail on it though. I like Gideon...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on February 13, 2015, 03:18:50 PM
Quote from: Estel2931 on February 13, 2015, 02:57:59 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on February 13, 2015, 02:52:09 PM
So the Lorwyn 5
Jace
Liliana
Chandra
Garruk (no longer veil cursed???)
Ajani

Wait, no, here is my thought, when they first debuted the board game last year they did not show the white walker, now is the because at the time they did not know who it was to be?
The Lorwyn 5 would make it Ajani, some speculated the return of Elspeth, but Gideon? Why Gideon????
What makes Gideon the choice for a white Walker other than the one off comment that people had trouble identifying with him because he is not human?

That is my question...

I read something on Quiet Speculation about Nissa and Gideon being in the set...they didn't go into much detail on it though. I like Gideon...
Yes, the planeswalkers are: Gideon, Jace, Liliana, Chandra, and Nissa. The art was shown on the Pro Tour and it also coordinates with the new game.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on February 13, 2015, 03:38:16 PM
Because white men must be repped
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Spikepit on February 13, 2015, 11:12:11 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 13, 2015, 08:11:54 PM
Gideon was obviously a soldier or some varation. But we don't know his back story that well... so that's why. Plus he is in the new board game so it ties in very well For marketing purposes, also... aJani has had a lot of recent support for his back story
Very good point mate! I suppose that's why they put Jace in too... (http://gif.co/pf1S.gif)

I know he's in because of marketing, but we already know everything about him! I would have much preferred {Tamiyo, the Moon Sage}, who we know nothing about!

#givejacearest
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on February 14, 2015, 10:54:21 AM
http://mtgsalvation.gamepedia.com/Gideon_Jura
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: the_intelligentleman on February 14, 2015, 11:13:40 AM
Quote from: Spikepit on February 13, 2015, 11:12:11 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 13, 2015, 08:11:54 PM
Gideon was obviously a soldier or some varation. But we don't know his back story that well... so that's why. Plus he is in the new board game so it ties in very well For marketing purposes, also... aJani has had a lot of recent support for his back story
Very good point mate! I suppose that's why try putHace in too... (http://gif.co/pf1S.gif)

I know he's in because of marketing, but already know everything about him! I would have much preferred {Tamiyo, the Moon Sage}, who know nothing about!

#givejacearest
SPIKE STOP WITH THE GIFS I CANT STOP GIVING YOU KARMA
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Avnger345 on February 27, 2015, 02:18:36 PM
Each of the five Planeswalkers featured in Magic Origins has an accompanying backstory, and that backstory will be told in a variety of ways.

Stories on the web: Around the release of Magic Origins, we'll publish the five official origin stories on DailyMTG.com, each one telling the tale of how those characters came to be Planeswalkers. These narratives were written by members of Magic R&D's creative team.
Magic Origins cards: You'll see cards in Magic Origins that tie to crucial moments in each Planeswalker's origin story. In addition to planeswalker cards, Planeswalker-associated spells, and legendary creatures, some cards will show glimpses of the Planeswalkers' home planes and first-planeswalk planes.
Magic Origins Prerelease boxes: There will also be quick-to-read summaries of the Planeswalkers' stories, hitting the highlights of each character's story using important Magic Origins cards, in the booklets included in your box at Magic Origins Prereleases.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Avnger345 on February 27, 2015, 02:25:33 PM
So prerelease, we get to pick by color I guess.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on February 27, 2015, 03:35:16 PM
Quote from: Avnger345 on February 27, 2015, 02:25:33 PM
So prerelease, we get to pick by color I guess.

By Planeswalker.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Falcon182 on February 27, 2015, 03:58:01 PM
I'm calling  {Tarmogoyf}
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on February 27, 2015, 04:40:07 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 27, 2015, 03:59:32 PM
I'm calling reprint of moxen while we are at it....   they wouldn't put goyf in standard. If anythibe they'd put it in MM2. I HOPE
I don't think they'd put it into standard with the fetches right now
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Falcon182 on February 27, 2015, 07:24:10 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on February 27, 2015, 04:40:07 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 27, 2015, 03:59:32 PM
I'm calling reprint of moxen while we are at it....   they wouldn't put goyf in standard. If anythibe they'd put it in MM2. I HOPE
I don't think they'd put it into standard with the fetches right now

They'd only overlap for 3-4 months or so while there is "super standard". It wouldn't break the format.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Spikepit on March 02, 2015, 03:53:14 AM
This just popped up as further explanation, of sorts, of the intention of the set (and MtG as whole story) trajectory.

http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/feature/whats-story-magic-origins-2015-02-27
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Skullguy725 on March 03, 2015, 03:46:04 PM
Quote from: Spikepit on March 02, 2015, 03:53:14 AM
This just popped up as further explanation, of sorts, of the intention of the set (and MtG as whole story) trajectory.

http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/feature/whats-story-magic-origins-2015-02-27

Huh. Zendikar was mentioned. Maybe we'll get some full art basics again.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Cender on March 03, 2015, 04:22:32 PM
Quote from: Skullguy725 on March 03, 2015, 03:46:04 PM
Quote from: Spikepit on March 02, 2015, 03:53:14 AM
This just popped up as further explanation, of sorts, of the intention of the set (and MtG as whole story) trajectory.

http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/feature/whats-story-magic-origins-2015-02-27

Huh. Zendikar was mentioned. Maybe we'll get some full art basics again.
Along with 9 other unmentioned planes. I wouldn't bank on this being the spot for full art lands.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on March 03, 2015, 04:24:03 PM
But zendikar has been mentioned and therefore confirmed we are getting fetches, eldrazi and every other card we couldn't get because we got into magic a few years after zendikar or whatever set you're stroking
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Skullguy725 on March 03, 2015, 09:29:18 PM
Quote from: Cender on March 03, 2015, 04:22:32 PM
Quote from: Skullguy725 on March 03, 2015, 03:46:04 PM
Quote from: Spikepit on March 02, 2015, 03:53:14 AM
This just popped up as further explanation, of sorts, of the intention of the set (and MtG as whole story) trajectory.

http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/feature/whats-story-magic-origins-2015-02-27

Huh. Zendikar was mentioned. Maybe we'll get some full art basics again.
Along with 9 other unmentioned planes. I wouldn't bank on this being the spot for full art lands.

Quote from: MuggyWuggy on March 03, 2015, 04:24:03 PM
But zendikar has been mentioned and therefore confirmed we are getting fetches, eldrazi and every other card we couldn't get because we got into magic a few years after zendikar or whatever set you're stroking

Just speculation, guys. I'm not counting on Origins having full art basics
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Cender on March 06, 2015, 03:26:24 PM
Double faced cards confirmed!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on March 06, 2015, 03:28:08 PM
Dfcs for legendary toplaneswalkers confirmed. Liliana, Heretical Healer flips to Liliana, Defiant Necromancer
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on March 06, 2015, 03:33:07 PM
Do we have pictures?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Spikepit on March 06, 2015, 05:46:18 PM
Pics are up on mythic spoiler already and I've added the link to the OP.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Stoneco1d869 on March 06, 2015, 06:21:54 PM
I want a Lili so bad!!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on March 06, 2015, 06:27:06 PM
Nice. Just spotted the lili on spoilers. Start out as a legendary creature, so can be a commander right?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Falcon182 on March 06, 2015, 06:27:46 PM
That lili seems schweet. Think it'll push out "of the veil"? Seems better than lily otv most of the time.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on March 06, 2015, 07:03:12 PM
No. She is not better than {Liliana of the Veil}.

Firstly because of the flip trigger. If you want Liliana you probably don't want a 2/3 lifelink. Which is an okay body for {1}{B}{B} but it's harshly overshadowed by {Vampire Nighthawk} in any eternal format. If your opponent is going to be killing one of your creatures, odds are it'll be Liliana instead of setting up you flipping her. Of course you can get one of your own creatures killed, but unless you devote resources to it (therefore changing the deck from what {Liliana of the Veil} is in and kinda ruining the point altogether) it's a hiccup. And if you do devote resources to it then your overall investment becomes more than {1}{B}{B} and a card. The point I'm making is you'd rather cast {Lilians of the Veil} instead of shifting or making a deck for {Liliana Heretical Healer}.

They have identical first abilities except that {Liliana, Defiant Necromancer} builds 2 at a time. A small edge compared to the previous paragraph. But not something to forget. We all know the power of building two at a time instead of one. ({Ashiok, Nightmare Weaver}, {Ugin, the Spirit Dragon}, {Venser, the Sojourner}).

The middle ability. The reason {Liliana of the Veil} is so revered /is that middle ability/. It is extremely valuable to be able to take down a hexproof, indestructible or other resilient threat and keep going. {Liliana, Defiant Necromancer} is a different can of worms intierly. I'd like to say I like it, but it's too weak. If you do it the first turn you can you get a creature with CMC 3 or less. If you go for 3 you lose Liliana which seems like a very poor investment. It does synergies with the first ability but the overall investment and non-legendary clause mean if you're running her for that you should just use {Zombify} or something similar. I may be wrong here but this is just how I see it.

Embleming {Grave Betrayl}? And on ALL creatures? I'm shocked there isn't an opponents clause. {Liliana of the Veil}'s ult is very solid as well, though. However for my personal taste I'd rather build around {Liliana, Defiant Necromancer} as it'll be more fun. However {Liliana of the Veil} is going to be more relevant generally.

The verdict: {Liliana Heretical Healer} is not and won't be what {Liliana of the Veil} is. They are different cards. I think {Liliana Heretical Healer} will make a very fun deck, but I do not see it having impacts on Modern or any other eternal format unless some insane synergetic/combo cards are printed/found to push her power levels into the WOW range. Currently I don't think she'll see much play, even in standard.

She will, however, be a great EDH deck. Focus on a sac theme and run after that emblem. She's also looking at a slot in Sac N Grab decks.

All in all I like her, she just isn't a 5 star card.

Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Falcon182 on March 06, 2015, 07:07:34 PM
I was thinking any black deck running  {Cabal Therapy} would love her. She is more deck specific I suppose but I think she's going to be really good!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Rass on March 07, 2015, 12:55:47 AM
Wtf? I thought that WotC said no more flip cards?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: NovusOrbis on March 07, 2015, 10:14:54 AM
Quote from: NovusOrbis on February 10, 2015, 12:04:56 AM
You know what would be so janky but so cool? Legendary creature forms of Jace, Lily, and such that flip to their planes walker form like the mechanic in Innistrad.
Lol I called it and got negged for it! New Lilly looks fun though!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: NovusOrbis on March 07, 2015, 12:04:19 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on March 07, 2015, 10:19:13 AM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 08, 2015, 05:18:57 PM
Also, the two images of "elspeth" and Lilian are actually 2 pictures of liliana, it's before she died or whatever and after Hence the reasoning for her Origins


oh my lord. They're gonna be flip csrds. Starting as legendaries, and then they flip into PWs!!!! The mechanics will be along the lines of "if you control a planeswalker... so and such" , much like lieutenant.
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 08, 2015, 05:13:38 PM
Legendary planeswalkers, I'm calling it now. Jace won't be a p-w but a legendary...
but I called it first ;-)
Indeed ;) and I got negged again
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on March 07, 2015, 02:34:40 PM
Quote from: NovusOrbis on March 07, 2015, 12:04:19 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on March 07, 2015, 10:19:13 AM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 08, 2015, 05:18:57 PM
Also, the two images of "elspeth" and Lilian are actually 2 pictures of liliana, it's before she died or whatever and after Hence the reasoning for her Origins


oh my lord. They're gonna be flip csrds. Starting as legendaries, and then they flip into PWs!!!! The mechanics will be along the lines of "if you control a planeswalker... so and such" , much like lieutenant.
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 08, 2015, 05:13:38 PM
Legendary planeswalkers, I'm calling it now. Jace won't be a p-w but a legendary...
but I called it first ;-)
Indeed ;) and I got negged again

I seconded it. :3
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on March 08, 2015, 02:39:40 PM
Oh.. Flipwalkers... Sigh lol
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on May 04, 2015, 12:01:52 PM
Real or fake?
http://m.imgur.com/UgUNII2
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on May 04, 2015, 01:37:10 PM
Quote from: particle on May 04, 2015, 12:01:52 PM
Real or fake?
http://m.imgur.com/UgUNII2

Leaning towards fake. I like it except that the middle ability sucks.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on May 04, 2015, 02:26:00 PM
Quote from: particle on May 04, 2015, 12:01:52 PM
Real or fake?
http://m.imgur.com/UgUNII2

Page not found :(
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on May 04, 2015, 03:42:59 PM
I feel like everything with it looked fine except the actual art of creature Chandra was really bad. You can barely tell there is a creature in there.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on May 04, 2015, 04:41:08 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on May 04, 2015, 03:32:48 PM
Image existed earlier, was a Chandra flip walker

1RR
2/2
Tap, ping one damage to creature or player.
when you cast red spell, untap chaNdra.
if chandra deals 3 damage to a player in a turn, flip her.

+ deal 2 damage to a player
- deal some amage to a creature
- - deals 6 damage to all players, they get emblem that says " deal 3 damage to them at upkeep."
LOL, seems like it could be remotely playable, can't be real!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on May 04, 2015, 08:26:10 PM
Hmmm... Cast her turn 3. Attack turn 4, then cast a red spell, then ping... Then flip
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: gtfotis on May 04, 2015, 09:02:33 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on May 04, 2015, 08:26:10 PM
Hmmm... Cast her turn 3. Attack turn 4, then cast a red spell, then ping... Then flip
Then two more damage with her +, I like the sound of it

Until she takes a {searing blood} to the face
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on May 21, 2015, 10:00:35 AM
When do spoilers start?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MarduArrow on May 21, 2015, 06:11:56 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on May 21, 2015, 10:00:35 AM
When do spoilers start?

πŸ‘†
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on May 21, 2015, 07:15:42 PM
Quote from: Taysby on May 21, 2015, 07:00:07 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on May 21, 2015, 06:57:00 PM
Quote from: MarduArrow on May 21, 2015, 06:11:56 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on May 21, 2015, 10:00:35 AM
When do spoilers start?

πŸ‘†

πŸ‘†πŸ‘†

πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†

πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on May 21, 2015, 10:40:02 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 21, 2015, 07:15:42 PM
Quote from: Taysby on May 21, 2015, 07:00:07 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on May 21, 2015, 06:57:00 PM
Quote from: MarduArrow on May 21, 2015, 06:11:56 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on May 21, 2015, 10:00:35 AM
When do spoilers start?

πŸ‘†

πŸ‘†πŸ‘†

πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†

πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†
πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Thetrufflehunter on May 21, 2015, 11:03:09 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on May 21, 2015, 11:01:55 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on May 21, 2015, 10:40:02 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 21, 2015, 07:15:42 PM
Quote from: Taysby on May 21, 2015, 07:00:07 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on May 21, 2015, 06:57:00 PM
Quote from: MarduArrow on May 21, 2015, 06:11:56 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on May 21, 2015, 10:00:35 AM
When do spoilers start?

πŸ‘†

πŸ‘†πŸ‘†

πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†

πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†

-snip-
Get on my level.
I'm actually getting negged for this 😜
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Rass on May 21, 2015, 11:10:57 PM
πŸ‘‡πŸΎ
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on May 21, 2015, 11:31:53 PM
Reported for spam.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on May 22, 2015, 07:10:00 AM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on May 22, 2015, 06:31:04 AM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 21, 2015, 11:31:53 PM
Reported for spam.
πŸ‘‡
Lol
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on May 22, 2015, 10:10:11 AM
This forum has gone downhill :(
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: gtfotis on May 22, 2015, 03:55:22 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on May 22, 2015, 10:10:11 AM
This forum has gone downhill :(
Seconded.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on May 22, 2015, 03:59:31 PM
The users are what make it

(So blame yourself)
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Deebiia on May 23, 2015, 09:47:03 PM
"Users"
More than one. Blame everyone.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on May 23, 2015, 09:55:47 PM
So I changed my user name on my second Clas of Clans account to "Darth Sidious"
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on May 23, 2015, 11:11:29 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on May 23, 2015, 09:55:47 PM
So I changed my user name on my second Clas of Clans account to "Darth Sidious"
Ok....
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on May 24, 2015, 06:54:15 AM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on May 23, 2015, 09:55:47 PM
So I changed my user name on my second Clas of Clans account to "Darth Sidious"
We have beautiful chat threads like in fun section we have:  last post wins.
Let's try to keep this clean for when there's actually something to say about Origins?
Slightly OT: read DotP: origins will be FTP with 100% unlock-by-play content. Looks like wizards noticed the success of HS?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on May 26, 2015, 03:52:57 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 24, 2015, 06:54:15 AM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on May 23, 2015, 09:55:47 PM
So I changed my user name on my second Clas of Clans account to "Darth Sidious"
We have beautiful chat threads like in fun section we have:  last post wins.
Let's try to keep this clean for when there's actually something to say about Origins?
Slightly OT: read DotP: origins will be FTP with 100% unlock-by-play content. Looks like wizards noticed the success of HS?
Too. Many. Acronyms πŸ˜–
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on May 26, 2015, 04:13:31 PM
The annual video game release, duels of the planeswalkers. The 2016 edition, called Origins, will be free to play. Wizards' hearthstone??
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on May 26, 2015, 07:21:32 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 26, 2015, 04:13:31 PM
The annual video game release, duels of the planeswalkers. The 2016 edition, called Origins, will be free to play. Wizards' hearthstone??
Hearthstone is actually pretty sweet, I got addicted recently.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on May 26, 2015, 07:29:21 PM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on May 26, 2015, 07:21:32 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 26, 2015, 04:13:31 PM
The annual video game release, duels of the planeswalkers. The 2016 edition, called Origins, will be free to play. Wizards' hearthstone??
Hearthstone is actually pretty sweet, I got addicted recently.

The game balance is frustrating. You can have a well constructed deck and just get wrecked by somebody just because they have legendaries.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on May 26, 2015, 07:40:00 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 26, 2015, 07:29:21 PM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on May 26, 2015, 07:21:32 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 26, 2015, 04:13:31 PM
The annual video game release, duels of the planeswalkers. The 2016 edition, called Origins, will be free to play. Wizards' hearthstone??
Hearthstone is actually pretty sweet, I got addicted recently.

The game balance is frustrating. You can have a well constructed deck and just get wrecked by somebody just because they have legendaries.
Most legendaries are bad. In fact if this is your outlook on the game watch Kripparian's Hearthstone Pay2Lose video
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on May 26, 2015, 07:55:09 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on May 26, 2015, 07:40:00 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 26, 2015, 07:29:21 PM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on May 26, 2015, 07:21:32 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 26, 2015, 04:13:31 PM
The annual video game release, duels of the planeswalkers. The 2016 edition, called Origins, will be free to play. Wizards' hearthstone??
Hearthstone is actually pretty sweet, I got addicted recently.

The game balance is frustrating. You can have a well constructed deck and just get wrecked by somebody just because they have legendaries.
Most legendaries are bad. In fact if this is your outlook on the game watch Kripparian's Hearthstone Pay2Lose video

Link? I'm speaking from experience of winning the game till they drop a legendary turns 6-9 and I lose. Very interested in seeing what I can do about this.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Falcon182 on May 26, 2015, 07:58:16 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 26, 2015, 07:55:09 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on May 26, 2015, 07:40:00 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 26, 2015, 07:29:21 PM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on May 26, 2015, 07:21:32 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 26, 2015, 04:13:31 PM
The annual video game release, duels of the planeswalkers. The 2016 edition, called Origins, will be free to play. Wizards' hearthstone??
Hearthstone is actually pretty sweet, I got addicted recently.

The game balance is frustrating. You can have a well constructed deck and just get wrecked by somebody just because they have legendaries.
Most legendaries are bad. In fact if this is your outlook on the game watch Kripparian's Hearthstone Pay2Lose video

Link? I'm speaking from experience of winning the game till they drop a legendary turns 6-9 and I lose. Very interested in seeing what I can do about this.

{Karakas}, bounce that legendary yo!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on May 26, 2015, 08:20:12 PM
Quote from: Falcon182 on May 26, 2015, 07:58:16 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 26, 2015, 07:55:09 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on May 26, 2015, 07:40:00 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 26, 2015, 07:29:21 PM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on May 26, 2015, 07:21:32 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 26, 2015, 04:13:31 PM
The annual video game release, duels of the planeswalkers. The 2016 edition, called Origins, will be free to play. Wizards' hearthstone??
Hearthstone is actually pretty sweet, I got addicted recently.

The game balance is frustrating. You can have a well constructed deck and just get wrecked by somebody just because they have legendaries.
Most legendaries are bad. In fact if this is your outlook on the game watch Kripparian's Hearthstone Pay2Lose video

Link? I'm speaking from experience of winning the game till they drop a legendary turns 6-9 and I lose. Very interested in seeing what I can do about this.

{Karakas}, bounce that legendary yo!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eZXmjZwG44U

There Ya go
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on May 27, 2015, 09:12:00 AM
So unconfirmed spoiler:
{hixus, prison warden} 3 {W} {W}
Legendary Creature
Flash
Whenever a creature deals combat damage to you, if hixus etb-ed this turn, exile that creature until hixus leaves the battlefield.
Rest of the card is cut off so no p/t.

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on May 27, 2015, 12:34:10 PM
Quote from: particle on May 27, 2015, 09:12:00 AM
So unconfirmed spoiler:
{hixus, prison warden} 3 {W} {W}
Legendary Creature
Flash
Whenever a creature deals combat damage to you, if hixus etb-ed this turn, exile that creature until hixus leaves the battlefield.
Rest of the card is cut off so no p/t.

Thoughts?
Seems like a decent EDH general
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on May 27, 2015, 02:53:07 PM
If he like, dies to {lightning bolt}....
Just kidding, but his survivability is pretty much a factor. You don't want to cast this dude just so your opponent can just recycle his etbs and flip up all his morphs right?
If he can survive until your own combat phase, it offers options.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on May 27, 2015, 02:59:09 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on May 27, 2015, 02:57:15 PM
watch him be a 3/6 or something

He'd be quite good.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on May 27, 2015, 03:29:00 PM
I mean seems bad to me but I just hate paying 5 mana for stuff that isn't card draw lol

Plus Spear of Heliod is similar and it doesn't see play
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on May 27, 2015, 03:42:50 PM
I read somewhere that his P/T will be like  {Keldon Warlord}, where * is equal to the damage you took...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on May 27, 2015, 04:39:18 PM
Agree with llama. Rather pay {G} for a {fog} and then whomp back with all his attackers tapped.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on May 27, 2015, 05:33:10 PM
If he prevented the damage we'd be in buisness.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaalia with haste on May 27, 2015, 05:38:00 PM
He's a new commander for that oblivion ring tribal EDH deck.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on May 27, 2015, 05:43:03 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on May 27, 2015, 05:41:52 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 27, 2015, 05:33:10 PM
If he prevented the damage we'd be in buisness.

this!!!

imagine if he flashed in to prevent damage and p/t was = damage prevented THEN we would have a beast

you attack with how many sliver/elf/infinite bullshit? cool, this dude, have a nice day

Sitting in the command zone like "come at me bro."  Would be a badass card.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on May 27, 2015, 05:58:08 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on May 27, 2015, 05:56:22 PM
Hell, even if it was just

2GW
2/2
flash
When it enters, prevent all combat damage that would be felt this turn


I'd play him

Me too probably.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on May 27, 2015, 06:04:16 PM
That Liliana though.... So going into my Alesha TL
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: griffin131 on May 28, 2015, 01:25:53 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on May 27, 2015, 03:29:00 PM
I mean seems bad to me but I just hate paying 5 mana for stuff that isn't card draw lol

Plus Spear of Heliod is similar and it doesn't see play
Spear taps to destroy one creature and has to target...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Ekann1 on May 28, 2015, 07:11:46 AM
Quote from: Noblellama on May 27, 2015, 05:41:52 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 27, 2015, 05:33:10 PM
If he prevented the damage we'd be in buisness.
Bye bye splinter twin's friends. (If they're smart they won't attack with the original.
this!!!

imagine if he flashed in to prevent damage and p/t was = damage prevented THEN we would have a beast

you attack with how many sliver/elf/infinite bullshit? cool, this dude, have a nice day
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on May 28, 2015, 07:16:25 AM
I'm not sure what to react on, but {splinter twin}?
The guy is legendary.
Oh, w8 nvm... Twin can actually copy legendaries.

However, state based actions being checked before you get priority, would his etb even trigger?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: blackychan1 on May 28, 2015, 09:28:48 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 28, 2015, 07:16:25 AM
I'm not sure what to react on, but {splinter twin}?
The guy is legendary.
Oh, w8 nvm... Twin can actually copy legendaries.

However, state based actions being checked before you get priority, would his etb even trigger?
Yes. He has to enter the battlefield for the state based action to even occur.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on May 28, 2015, 10:05:54 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 28, 2015, 07:16:25 AM
I'm not sure what to react on, but {splinter twin}?
The guy is legendary.
Oh, w8 nvm... Twin can actually copy legendaries.

However, state based actions being checked before you get priority, would his etb even trigger?

The fact that state based actions are checked and may change things does not mean the game won't see the necessary conditions met for a trigger and then let the player trigger them. A player can't put those triggers on to the stack until he or she next receives priority but the trigger isnt negated by state based actions changing the boardstate. Both players can have triggers waiting to go on the stack while state based actions are happening.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on May 28, 2015, 01:56:04 PM
Quote from: particle on May 28, 2015, 10:05:54 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 28, 2015, 07:16:25 AM
I'm not sure what to react on, but {splinter twin}?
The guy is legendary.
Oh, w8 nvm... Twin can actually copy legendaries.

However, state based actions being checked before you get priority, would his etb even trigger?

The fact that state based actions are checked and may change things does not mean the game won't see the necessary conditions met for a trigger and then let the player trigger them. A player can't put those triggers on to the stack until he or she next receives priority but the trigger isnt negated by state based actions changing the boardstate. Both players can have triggers waiting to go on the stack while state based actions are happening.
Tx for clearing it up.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Ekann1 on May 28, 2015, 05:37:59 PM
Quote from: particle on May 28, 2015, 10:05:54 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on May 28, 2015, 07:16:25 AM
I'm not sure what to react on, but {splinter twin}?
The guy is legendary.
Oh, w8 nvm... Twin can actually copy legendaries.

However, state based actions being checked before you get priority, would his etb even trigger?

The fact that state based actions are checked and may change things does not mean the game won't see the necessary conditions met for a trigger and then let the player trigger them. A player can't put those triggers on to the stack until he or she next receives priority but the trigger isnt negated by state based actions changing the boardstate. Both players can have triggers waiting to go on the stack while state based actions are happening.
What I meant was, if he had a built in fog and became as big as the number of creatures he exiled, he'd be good against splinter twin decks. Not to splinter twin himself.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: blackychan1 on May 28, 2015, 09:52:59 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on May 28, 2015, 06:14:55 PM
If he just fogged he'd be instantly playable. like if it was "exile any number of attacking creatures"...except he woukd be a cheaper version of that angel yhat foes it. {angel of the dire hour} or whatevs
That's dirty....
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Thetrufflehunter on June 04, 2015, 10:29:20 AM
Waaaaaaaat. Gideon is from theerrrrrooooosssss?

http://imgur.com/xJWURYH
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 04, 2015, 10:32:04 AM
Oh snap! Lily is from the Nexus of the Multiverse!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Remillo on June 04, 2015, 10:38:01 AM
Anyone else getting a Power Ranger/Super Sentai feel from that image with the nonwalkers and walkers?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Brawler_1337 on June 04, 2015, 10:44:20 AM
Quote from: Thetrufflehunter on June 04, 2015, 10:29:20 AM
Waaaaaaaat. Gideon is from theerrrrrooooosssss?

http://imgur.com/xJWURYH
Yup. I believe they retconned that from some other unknown plane, but they hinted at it on the flavor text of that RW Strive spell from JOU. {Desperate Stand}
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Brawler_1337 on June 04, 2015, 02:38:19 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 04, 2015, 12:39:50 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on June 04, 2015, 10:32:04 AM
Oh snap! Lily is from the Nexus of the Multiverse!!

Dominaria FTW!!!

I feel kinda bad for Liliana, I don't know what time period of dominaria she is from but it has seen some .poo. so who knows how bad things were while she was there, then she ignites and where does she walk to? The mother F-ing dark horror world of Innistraad. No wonder she is messed up and a pure {B} made, I claim she is a victim of her circumstances (;) )


Also, Kaladesh, Regatha and Vryn are new places to go :)
Regatha and Vryn were both shown on Planechase cards, and references to at least Regatha have been made in the lore. I don't recall if there was anything about Kaladesh, though.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 04, 2015, 02:42:45 PM
Quote from: Brawler_1337 on June 04, 2015, 02:38:19 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 04, 2015, 12:39:50 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on June 04, 2015, 10:32:04 AM
Oh snap! Lily is from the Nexus of the Multiverse!!

Dominaria FTW!!!

I feel kinda bad for Liliana, I don't know what time period of dominaria she is from but it has seen some .poo. so who knows how bad things were while she was there, then she ignites and where does she walk to? The mother F-ing dark horror world of Innistraad. No wonder she is messed up and a pure {B} made, I claim she is a victim of her circumstances (;) )


Also, Kaladesh, Regatha and Vryn are new places to go :)
Regatha and Vryn were both shown on Planechase cards, and references to at least Regatha have been made in the lore. I don't recall if there was anything about Kaladesh, though.
Except that fire magic is banned
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 04, 2015, 02:46:00 PM
Kaladesh rings nothing but a WoW bell to me.
Blood elf greeting: Kaladesh malanor.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: gtfotis on June 08, 2015, 01:25:29 AM
Quote from: Thetrufflehunter on June 04, 2015, 10:29:20 AM
Waaaaaaaat. Gideon is from theerrrrrooooosssss?

http://imgur.com/xJWURYH
What a boring place to be :(
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Remillo on June 08, 2015, 07:16:25 AM
Well, it looks like Scry, Prowess and Menace (can't be blocked except by two or more creatures) are going evergreen.  If any of the walkers in this set had been to Mirrodin, I'd speculate a Serum Visions reprint in Origins, buuuuuut, I'm pretty sure none of hem have.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 08, 2015, 10:05:23 AM
I cannot wait until preorders start!!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Cender on June 08, 2015, 10:48:38 AM
Goodbye land walk. You will not be missed
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 08, 2015, 10:49:55 AM
Quote from: Cender on June 08, 2015, 10:48:38 AM
Goodbye land walk. You will not be missed
But I love  {Aysen Highway}!! Lol
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 08, 2015, 11:13:48 AM
Spoilers coming in.
Love the flavor text on Reave Soul
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 08, 2015, 01:36:49 PM
{Lightning Javelin} is horrible. {Bolt of Keranos} was cheaper and does the same thing. In limited it's a burn card so it'll be good but in constructed {Cunning Strike} is better.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: redwolv on June 09, 2015, 02:48:02 AM
So far i am very dissapointeed from the recent spoilers. Some of the stuff has had good flavor but none of the recent cards have stood out to me.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 09, 2015, 04:56:20 AM
People already miss modern masters
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on June 09, 2015, 09:01:08 AM
Did anyone see the crappy mythic Dragon?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Rass on June 09, 2015, 09:16:38 AM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on June 08, 2015, 10:05:23 AM
I cannot wait until preorders start!!!

eBay has preorders on boxes already.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Millionlittlee on June 09, 2015, 10:09:25 AM
Quote from: bravado883 on June 09, 2015, 10:03:19 AM
I'm not so sure that dragon is crappy man. It's at the high end of an aggro curve--I can definitely see a slightly more robust mono-red aggro deck playing this as a curve topper. In that deck it's basically {Outpost Siege} on a big-ass evasive body. The discard doesn't really matter. I'm pretty sure I'LL never play with it, but I bet it does see constructed play.

End step in response to the trigger kill it
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Millionlittlee on June 09, 2015, 11:17:20 AM
Quote from: bravado883 on June 09, 2015, 10:19:52 AM
Quote from: Millionlittlee on June 09, 2015, 10:09:25 AM
Quote from: bravado883 on June 09, 2015, 10:03:19 AM
I'm not so sure that dragon is crappy man. It's at the high end of an aggro curve--I can definitely see a slightly more robust mono-red aggro deck playing this as a curve topper. In that deck it's basically {Outpost Siege} on a big-ass evasive body. The discard doesn't really matter. I'm pretty sure I'LL never play with it, but I bet it does see constructed play.


End step in response to the trigger kill it

So what? I have to discard my empty hand or these extra mountains I'm holding? It's the top of an aggro or burn deck, and it seems pretty clear you don't play the card with a full grip. Someone who plays lots of red decks want to weigh in on this? I could be wrong here, but a 4/4 evasive creature that generates card advantage (essentially) for free in a color that wants it seems good to me.

That's the point it's only good if it is the last good card in your hand. Which can happen but it can be a bad draw a lot of the time
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Rass on June 09, 2015, 11:20:23 AM
Don't play with 4. I could see 2,  maybe 3 but doubt that.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Cender on June 09, 2015, 05:47:41 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 09, 2015, 05:43:06 PM
I keep looking at the spoiler list and wondering that maybe they are spoiling the crap first and saving the good stuff for the end?

Keep in mind almost all the spoiled stuff is going in the 30 card "starter" decks. The most basic of the basic.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 09, 2015, 05:48:07 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 09, 2015, 05:43:06 PM
I keep looking at the spoiler list and wondering that maybe they are spoiling the crap first and saving the good stuff for the end?
It is a Core Set after all...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 09, 2015, 07:39:37 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 09, 2015, 07:06:30 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on June 09, 2015, 06:08:12 PM
Guys... they spoiled 30 commons....   chill out, there will be more wonderful cards. There have been no rares and only 2 mythics. There's a lot more goodies

Its all crap!!
*throws all the cards and rage quits magic*



*comes back and picks up all the cards and starts sorting them back into order...*
And I silently creep in and snatch up all the lilianas without you knowing
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Lord of the Flying Guinea-Potatoes on June 10, 2015, 09:34:11 AM
They spoiled the PT of Hixus, the white legendary dude that exiles stuff.  Turns out he's a 4/4.  What do you guys think about his playability now?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaalia with haste on June 10, 2015, 09:58:54 AM
Quote from: Lord of the Flying Guinea-Potatoes on June 10, 2015, 09:34:11 AM
They spoiled the PT of Hixus, the white legendary dude that exiles stuff.  Turns out he's a 4/4.  What do you guys think about his playability now?
0 standard modern and legacy play. He's a joke in those formats.

I don't think he can command his own EDH deck very well either. He seems solid in sisay though.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 10, 2015, 01:01:20 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 10, 2015, 12:58:10 PM
Anyone else feel like wizards is punishing us?

We got a peek at the prison ward dude, so they are like "today you get a whole bunch of bad and reprinted commons and uncommons, and a questionable mythic to go with" and then the next day is "well here is the rest of that card you knew about" and today its nothing...
I do feel that overall there is less coverage. Wasn't into spoiler season with M15, though. Is it usual for a core set to get less press?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 10, 2015, 01:36:36 PM
Meeeeeh
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 10, 2015, 01:41:59 PM
Quote from: Kaalia with haste on June 10, 2015, 09:58:54 AM
Quote from: Lord of the Flying Guinea-Potatoes on June 10, 2015, 09:34:11 AM
They spoiled the PT of Hixus, the white legendary dude that exiles stuff.  Turns out he's a 4/4.  What do you guys think about his playability now?
0 standard modern and legacy play. He's a joke in those formats.

I don't think he can command his own EDH deck very well either. He seems solid in sisay though.

If only he prevented the damage...

I can see him as a nice intimidator sitting in the command zone but that's it. It's one of those cards that I want to like but it's just..not that good.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 10, 2015, 02:01:50 PM
I love Chandra's back story...
Can't wait to see her card
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 10, 2015, 02:03:38 PM
I'm hoping for a sac outlet t1/2 for lili for t3 flip
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 10, 2015, 02:04:46 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 10, 2015, 02:03:38 PM
I'm hoping for a sac outlet t1/2 for lili for t3 flip
Oh lili is going in my Alesha TL...
It's going to be interesting...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Cender on June 11, 2015, 10:03:32 AM
Confirmed on Twitter - no {Serum Visions} in origins
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Deebiia on June 11, 2015, 12:35:37 PM
Quote from: Cender on June 11, 2015, 10:03:32 AM
Confirmed on Twitter - no {Serum Visions} in origins
Keep rising you beautiful bastage. Up to $12 now.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 11, 2015, 01:00:42 PM
Quote from: Deebiia on June 11, 2015, 12:35:37 PM
Quote from: Cender on June 11, 2015, 10:03:32 AM
Confirmed on Twitter - no {Serum Visions} in origins
Keep rising you beautiful bastage. Up to $12 now.

I remember getting mine for $2 :D so happy :P
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Ekann1 on June 11, 2015, 03:43:27 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 11, 2015, 01:00:42 PM
Quote from: Deebiia on June 11, 2015, 12:35:37 PM
Quote from: Cender on June 11, 2015, 10:03:32 AM
Confirmed on Twitter - no {Serum Visions} in origins
Keep rising you beautiful bastage. Up to $12 now.

I remember getting mine for $2 :D so happy :P
Same, but then I sold mine for 5 :(
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Cender on June 12, 2015, 06:20:15 AM
This week wasn't really supposed to be spoiler week. They decided to release the evergreen announcement and the 30 card deck lists ahead of time so everyone would have a chance to come to terms with the news about prowess/menace/Scry.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 12, 2015, 01:40:25 PM
Quote from: bravado883 on June 12, 2015, 08:48:55 AM
How do you guys feel about the change? I'm personally ambivalent (mostly, I'm pretty stoked about scry being evergreen), but when I read the article by MaRo about why they made the changes the reasons seem really weak. "What do you do if your opponent's creatures have landwalk and you have the appropriate land. Not play basic land?" I was thinking "uh...kill it with something?" Same with intimidate--seems the reasoning is "sometimes it's really good and sometimes it's really bad." To me that makes for interesting deckbuilding decisions.

The thing with limited is that removal is scarce. One {Krenko's Inforcer} can and will win you a game sometimes, and there's nothing like losing to that. I personally always played red/artifacts and backed off from blue during M15 because I was sick of getting island walk/intimidated to death. R/B were the colors to play.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: The1337Magician on June 12, 2015, 02:12:46 PM
http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/making-magic/evergreen-eggs-ham-2015-06-08

For those who haven't seen the evergreen update and explanation from Maro.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on June 12, 2015, 08:53:28 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on May 04, 2015, 12:20:44 PM
Quote from: particle on May 04, 2015, 12:01:52 PM
Real or fake?
http://m.imgur.com/UgUNII2

If so it is very convincing
The set symbol, lettering, numbering and format look legit, art is unizque (not from elsewhere) though the primary art looks odd. and the font for the flip side leaves me feeling like it is slightly off...
Well sorry to pull this back up again but Mari may have confirmed the front side of the Chandra on his Tumblr
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: cltrn81 on June 12, 2015, 10:42:24 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on June 12, 2015, 08:53:28 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on May 04, 2015, 12:20:44 PM
Quote from: particle on May 04, 2015, 12:01:52 PM
Real or fake?
http://m.imgur.com/UgUNII2

If so it is very convincing
The set symbol, lettering, numbering and format look legit, art is unizque (not from elsewhere) though the primary art looks odd. and the font for the flip side leaves me feeling like it is slightly off...
Well sorry to pull this back up again but Mari may have confirmed the front side of the Chandra on his Tumblr
link does not work anymore
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 14, 2015, 08:14:01 AM
We got walker flip cards. Jace has a milling ultimate, meh. His other abilities are cool but why dat ult? Chandra seems ok might be good. Nissa does not seem good to me but I like the fact that she filters when she enters as a creature. Maybe some broken way to just keep playing her to thin your deck. And an alternate to {cyclonic rift}. Edh just got a little worse.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 14, 2015, 08:32:20 AM
Preorders for lily are already over 20...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on June 14, 2015, 09:01:24 AM
Can we talk about how the jace walker's second ability is a Snapcaster mage?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 14, 2015, 09:20:13 AM
Quote from: Munchlax on June 14, 2015, 09:01:24 AM
Can we talk about how the jace walker's second ability is a Snapcaster mage?
I like them. And yeah, snappy for 3 loyalty.
Just too bad you can't reset their loyalty that easily. If you flicker them, they return as creatures right?

On another note, is it too late to call {giant spider} is in this set?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Deebiia on June 14, 2015, 01:54:30 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on June 14, 2015, 09:01:24 AM
Can we talk about how the jace walker's second ability is a Snapcaster mage?
So far I can see, if Chandra doesn't cost too much to cast, adding both of them to my Izzet burn deck. Chandra's abilities makes it so I don't have to focus on players with like any of my burn spells and the Jace helps me use cards in my graveyard yet. If the theory is true where they're trying to make all 3 cmc walkers for TL in this set, then Chandra will be like {2}{R} for a really viable walker. As much as others are groaning about having to transform them, Jace's ability is really good card draw which then if I discard a higher cmc burn spell I can use it later with his -3. Chandra is a little dumb in the sense that I ping with her, cast a {Shock}, ping, {Lightning Bolt}, ping, {Searing Blood} and suddenly I transform her and do 2 more damage. On 4th turn I do 13 damage- Assuming that she will follow the 3 cmc trend in this set. Mmm, so good.

Looked this up as well for ya:
110.6b Permanents enter the battlefield untapped, unflipped, face up, and phased in unless a spell or ability says otherwise.

http://community.wizards.com/content/forum-topic/3398236
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 14, 2015, 02:16:12 PM
Ah, thanks. Always nice to have CR confirmation.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 14, 2015, 02:38:21 PM
So meh
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: the_intelligentleman on June 14, 2015, 03:20:45 PM
All of the walkers are just bad. I'm veyr disappointed.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 14, 2015, 04:29:30 PM
IMO Liliana is the worst one. Jace is very reasonably priced. I'd rather play {Jace, Architect of Thought} for defence or {Jace, Memory Adept} for mill /but this Jace is two mana/. He also comes in at 5. He is not "good" but I think he's solid value for mana. If he was a 0/4 we'd be in serious business as a solid chump blocker for control into a self protecting win con.

I think that Chandra is very viable. A three mana untapping pinger is pretty sick. Her emblem is basically "you win, or win soon". The only problem is her middle ability is kinda...terrible. I mean -2 for a half power {Flameslash}? C'mon!

Nissa is, IMO, really solid. If only she flipped at ~5 lands. She tutors a land on a reasonable 2/2 frame. Then her +1 is card draw, awesome. I think it's a neat limitation that her middle ability puts out a legendary. It's a reasonable ability. Her ult isn't /amazing/ but it's solid. I'm not one for green but I like it. I know she isn't, but is she a viable {Scapeshift} card?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 14, 2015, 04:53:59 PM
Lily will be sweet in my Alesha TL... Come on, a recurring PW? And I have several ways to make sure she flips...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: lotrwk on June 14, 2015, 08:50:33 PM
Chandra is super good
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Deebiia on June 14, 2015, 11:55:17 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 14, 2015, 04:29:30 PM
IMO Liliana is the worst one. Jace is very reasonably priced. I'd rather play {Jace, Architect of Thought} for defence or {Jace, Memory Adept} for mill /but this Jace is two mana/. He also comes in at 5. He is not "good" but I think he's solid value for mana. If he was a 0/4 we'd be in serious business as a solid chump blocker for control into a self protecting win con.

I think that Chandra is very viable. A three mana untapping pinger is pretty sick. Her emblem is basically "you win, or win soon". The only problem is her middle ability is kinda...terrible. I mean -2 for a half power {Flameslash}? C'mon!

Nissa is, IMO, really solid. If only she flipped at ~5 lands. She tutors a land on a reasonable 2/2 frame. Then her +1 is card draw, awesome. I think it's a neat limitation that her middle ability puts out a legendary. It's a reasonable ability. Her ult isn't /amazing/ but it's solid. I'm not one for green but I like it. I know she isn't, but is she a viable {Scapeshift} card?
I guess I really like her since her + makes it a lot easier on my spells. I can focus my spells on creatures instead of targeting the opponent.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Remillo on June 15, 2015, 12:05:32 AM
You guys should realize that Chandra doesn't care how she deals the damage, only that she's dealt 3 or more damage that turn.  If you need to flip her, you can, say, attack in for 2, bolt them, tap her to ping and get the flip.  Also, you can stack up the damage by activating her, casting a spell to untap, tap, cast to untap, etc.  you can chain together maybe 3 or 4 activations like that with Shocks and Bolts before each one resolves and eventually flip her, to finish off with a +1.  She has cool potential, you just have to work in weird ways.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: General Kiwi on June 15, 2015, 09:30:26 AM
I'm shocked no one is talking about mizzium meddlers
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaalia with haste on June 15, 2015, 09:34:58 AM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 14, 2015, 04:29:30 PM
IMO Liliana is the worst one. Jace is very reasonably priced. I'd rather play {Jace, Architect of Thought} for defence or {Jace, Memory Adept} for mill /but this Jace is two mana/. He also comes in at 5. He is not "good" but I think he's solid value for mana. If he was a 0/4 we'd be in serious business as a solid chump blocker for control into a self protecting win con.

I think that Chandra is very viable. A three mana untapping pinger is pretty sick. Her emblem is basically "you win, or win soon". The only problem is her middle ability is kinda...terrible. I mean -2 for a half power {Flameslash}? C'mon!

Nissa is, IMO, really solid. If only she flipped at ~5 lands. She tutors a land on a reasonable 2/2 frame. Then her +1 is card draw, awesome. I think it's a neat limitation that her middle ability puts out a legendary. It's a reasonable ability. Her ult isn't /amazing/ but it's solid. I'm not one for green but I like it. I know she isn't, but is she a viable {Scapeshift} card?
Dude Lili is easily the best one. Play her with any other creature, and your opponent can't make any meaningful attacks in without flipping Lili. One lili flips she will dominate the game. Your guy dies? He's back, don't worry 'bout it. Don't have a guy to reanimate? How about an awesome +2? All this and a freaking zombie token when she flips. This all comes in a neat package of 1BB for a 2/3 lifelink. If LOTV didn't already see modern play, I could see this in a lot of the GBx decks.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Ekann1 on June 15, 2015, 09:37:04 AM
Quote from: Kaalia with haste on June 15, 2015, 09:34:58 AM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 14, 2015, 04:29:30 PM
IMO Liliana is the worst one. Jace is very reasonably priced. I'd rather play {Jace, Architect of Thought} for defence or {Jace, Memory Adept} for mill /but this Jace is two mana/. He also comes in at 5. He is not "good" but I think he's solid value for mana. If he was a 0/4 we'd be in serious business as a solid chump blocker for control into a self protecting win con.

I think that Chandra is very viable. A three mana untapping pinger is pretty sick. Her emblem is basically "you win, or win soon". The only problem is her middle ability is kinda...terrible. I mean -2 for a half power {Flameslash}? C'mon!

Nissa is, IMO, really solid. If only she flipped at ~5 lands. She tutors a land on a reasonable 2/2 frame. Then her +1 is card draw, awesome. I think it's a neat limitation that her middle ability puts out a legendary. It's a reasonable ability. Her ult isn't /amazing/ but it's solid. I'm not one for green but I like it. I know she isn't, but is she a viable {Scapeshift} card?
Dude Lili is easily the best one. Play her with any other creature, and your opponent can't make any meaningful attacks in without flipping Lili. One lili flips she will dominate the game. Your guy dies? He's back, don't worry 'bout it. Don't have a guy to reanimate? How about an awesome +2? All this and a freaking zombie token when she flips. This all comes in a neat package of 1BB for a 2/3 lifelink. If LOTV didn't already see modern play, I could see this in a lot of the GBx decks.
Yeah, I feel like an important part people are glancing over is that she makes a 2/2 to protect herself or do whatever else needs to be done...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: griffin131 on June 15, 2015, 11:32:19 AM
{Spellskite} is cool, but Meddlers allows surprise. That's huge.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Remillo on June 15, 2015, 12:40:29 PM
Well, Chandra's Ignition is insanely flavorful and very, very aptly named.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 15, 2015, 12:43:30 PM
Quote from: Remillo on June 15, 2015, 12:40:29 PM
Well, Chandra's Ignition is insanely flavorful and very, very aptly named.
Kaboom!
Let's target a lifelink creature with that.

EDIT:
Chandra's Ignition
{3}{R}{R}
Sorcery
Target creature you control deals damage equal to its power to each other creature and each opponent.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 15, 2015, 12:55:44 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 15, 2015, 12:43:30 PM
Quote from: Remillo on June 15, 2015, 12:40:29 PM
Well, Chandra's Ignition is insanely flavorful and very, very aptly named.
Kaboom!
Let's target a lifelink creature with that.

EDIT:
Chandra's Ignition
{3}{R}{R}
Sorcery
Target creature you control deals damage equal to its power to each other creature and each opponent.
{Blightsteel Colossus}anyone?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 15, 2015, 12:55:45 PM
The whole idea of collected company into potential PWs is kind of nice, I'm not sure how I feel about nissa, seems kind of weak compared to world waker
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 15, 2015, 02:33:51 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on June 15, 2015, 12:55:44 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 15, 2015, 12:43:30 PM
Quote from: Remillo on June 15, 2015, 12:40:29 PM
Well, Chandra's Ignition is insanely flavorful and very, very aptly named.
Kaboom!
Let's target a lifelink creature with that.

EDIT:
Chandra's Ignition
{3}{R}{R}
Sorcery
Target creature you control deals damage equal to its power to each other creature and each opponent.
{Blightsteel Colossus}anyone?
Yoinks!
My mind read each PLAYER instead of each opponent... That's gonna kill games.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 15, 2015, 05:53:34 PM
That bounce spell is pretty nasty
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: the_intelligentleman on June 15, 2015, 06:02:50 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 15, 2015, 05:53:34 PM
That bounce spell is pretty nasty
It's the blue {Engineered Explosives}.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Splicer on June 15, 2015, 06:12:58 PM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on June 15, 2015, 06:02:50 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 15, 2015, 05:53:34 PM
That bounce spell is pretty nasty
It's the blue {Engineered Explosives}.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaalia with haste on June 15, 2015, 06:43:53 PM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on June 15, 2015, 06:02:50 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 15, 2015, 05:53:34 PM
That bounce spell is pretty nasty
It's the blue [Engineered Explosives].
Blue has {engineered explosives}. It's called {engineered explosives}.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 16, 2015, 09:01:49 PM
Quote from: Taysby on June 16, 2015, 08:40:55 PM
We now have a one mana walker and he's really good.
W 2/1
2w gains indestructible
At end of combat, if he and 2 other dudes attacked flip him

+2 up to 1 creature attacks Gideon
+1 target creature gains indestructible. Untap it
0 becomes a 4/4 with indestructible prevent all damage.
Another walker for my TL... Damn, I'm dropping so much money on just walkers lol
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 16, 2015, 09:09:12 PM
Quote from: Taysby on June 16, 2015, 08:40:55 PM
We now have a one mana walker and he's really good.
W 2/1
2w gains indestructible
At end of combat, if he and 2 other dudes attacked flip him

+2 up to 1 creature attacks Gideon
+1 target creature gains indestructible. Untap it
0 becomes a 4/4 with indestructible prevent all damage.

That's insanely good.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: cltrn81 on June 16, 2015, 09:20:56 PM
Yea i am so in like with gideon.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: the_intelligentleman on June 16, 2015, 10:41:48 PM
Gideon is v good
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: The1337Magician on June 16, 2015, 10:49:17 PM
In EDH, if you animate Gideon with his 0 ability, does it still count as Commander damage?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 16, 2015, 11:32:41 PM
Commander is still commander

Just as it may enter the command zone rather than be shuffled, exiled, destroyed etc
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Remillo on June 17, 2015, 12:00:17 AM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on June 16, 2015, 10:51:59 PM
I believe it does not because it's a new entity, and is not named -Not Gideon- like the commander originally is. However {Akroma, Angel of Vengence} the red one still deals combat damage when it's a 2/2 morphed so I'm not really sure.

Commanderness is a quality of the physical card itself, so he should be dealing commander damage as both Kytheon and Gideon
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 17, 2015, 04:42:34 AM
Quote from: Remillo on June 17, 2015, 12:00:17 AM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on June 16, 2015, 10:51:59 PM
I believe it does not because it's a new entity, and is not named -Not Gideon- like the commander originally is. However {Akroma, Angel of Vengence} the red one still deals combat damage when it's a 2/2 morphed so I'm not really sure.

Commanderness is a quality of the physical card itself, so he should be dealing commander damage as both Kytheon and Gideon
Yup. If you manage to animate one of the C14 commander-planeswalkers, they'll do commander damage as well.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Rass on June 17, 2015, 01:03:52 PM
 {Dragonlord Ojutai} Slowly falling.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on June 17, 2015, 01:15:28 PM
Quote from: Rass on June 17, 2015, 01:03:52 PM
{Dragonlord Ojutai} Slowly falling.

Lol wrong thread
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaalia with haste on June 17, 2015, 01:29:55 PM
I play tokens in modern. Gideon isn't going in this deck. Too clunky.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 17, 2015, 01:41:50 PM
Did I just read an article stating that you pick your walker at the prerelease?
So are the walkers the promo's?
If so, I really wanna go.
http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/arcana/magic-origins-theme-weeks-2015-06-17
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Rass on June 17, 2015, 02:03:24 PM
Quote from: DirtyMustachio on June 17, 2015, 01:15:28 PM
Quote from: Rass on June 17, 2015, 01:03:52 PM
{Dragonlord Ojutai} Slowly falling.

Lol wrong thread

I was testing to see who would catch it😜😜😜😜
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Falcon182 on June 17, 2015, 04:18:12 PM
Quote from: Potticus on June 17, 2015, 03:54:49 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 17, 2015, 03:32:24 PM
Quote from: Potticus on June 17, 2015, 03:30:19 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 17, 2015, 01:41:50 PM
Did I just read an article stating that you pick your walker at the prerelease?
So are the walkers the promo's?
If so, I really wanna go.
http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/arcana/magic-origins-theme-weeks-2015-06-17

How to ruin a set's value. Make the mythics promos. However, it keeps the standard format a lot cheaper...

I don't mind ;)

Me neither, just thinking that's a really weird thing to make the mythics the promos.

They used to do that. Non-playable promo mythics.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 17, 2015, 06:00:00 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 17, 2015, 05:53:30 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on June 17, 2015, 05:50:29 PM
Glissa, Wurmcoil engine, emrakul, etc...

Your naming my favorite cards...

*you're
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: cltrn81 on June 17, 2015, 07:31:14 PM
Just cuz you pick the walker does not mean you get the card.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: The1337Magician on June 17, 2015, 08:35:00 PM
In the past block, there have been a couple possible promos per clan. It could be a chance that you could get the mythic, or you could get the junk rare.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 17, 2015, 09:39:23 PM
New elf lord. Seems sweet. Wonder if tribal will be a thing.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 18, 2015, 12:13:00 AM
Quote from: particle on June 17, 2015, 09:39:23 PM
New elf lord. Seems sweet. Wonder if tribal will be a thing.

A new elf lord could very well be a tie in for Zendikat.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 18, 2015, 06:17:56 AM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 18, 2015, 12:13:00 AM
Quote from: particle on June 17, 2015, 09:39:23 PM
New elf lord. Seems sweet. Wonder if tribal will be a thing.

A new elf lord could very well be a tie in for Zendikat.
Well, Nissa is from Zendikar, she's in origins, could be a tie in there,
Liliana is from  Dominaria, the first in-game elf lord was from there, so there's the tie-in there
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 18, 2015, 12:01:26 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on June 18, 2015, 10:28:54 AM
The elf would definitely be from Lorwyn. They talk about eyeblights and whatnot..  lorwyn elf talk
That's it!!!
We're going back to the Shadow Realm!!! Lol
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on June 19, 2015, 10:34:22 AM
Green draw enchantment

And Chandra's brother&sister maybe married and ones by law, don't think it's her parents

On second glance, I don't think they are bother and sister, I believe their either her parents or her brother and his wife
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on June 19, 2015, 11:47:57 AM
What is this lore you speak of, I ain't got no time for that
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 19, 2015, 09:26:44 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on June 19, 2015, 09:01:51 PM
New card,
2U

When you a draw a card, opponent mills two. If they are the same color repeat

5U: draw then discard

I like.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 19, 2015, 11:45:15 PM
Buy {Painter Servants} NOW!!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 20, 2015, 12:11:27 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 19, 2015, 11:45:15 PM
Buy {Painter Servants} NOW!!!

I agree but if it's good it'll get banned so expect a hype train and unload quickly.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: the_intelligentleman on June 20, 2015, 12:16:26 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 19, 2015, 11:45:15 PM
Buy {Painter Servants} NOW!!!
Is is banned in modern?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Lord of the Flying Guinea-Potatoes on June 20, 2015, 01:02:36 AM
Glowack forgot a crucial part of this card: the two cards must both share a color, and both be NONLAND.  Unfortunately, this invalidates the {painter's servant} combo. 😒
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 20, 2015, 03:55:47 AM
Quote from: Lord of the Flying Guinea-Potatoes on June 20, 2015, 01:02:36 AM
Glowack forgot a crucial part of this card: the two cards must both share a color, and both be NONLAND.  Unfortunately, this invalidates the {painter's servant} combo. 😒
Painter will still help. Doesn't go infinite, but about 36/60, aka 60% will be non land, ratio goes up with fetches, since they filter. Gives nice odds to get two nonland.And milling two for every draw is nice anyway.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 20, 2015, 08:25:17 AM
I know I realized on the price thread lol damn!!

It's not good enough to me to be playable now though :( I mean sure a random rogue deck in modern might play it but mill isn't really good in Modern :(
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on June 20, 2015, 01:37:29 PM
You guys see the new guy

*/4

His power is equal to the amount of lands you control

{2}{G}{R}
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Thetrufflehunter on June 20, 2015, 01:40:40 PM
Quote from: DirtyMustachio on June 20, 2015, 01:37:29 PM
You guys see the new guy

*/4

His power is equal to the amount of lands you control

{2}{G}{R}
so {Rubble Hulk}?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 20, 2015, 03:08:43 PM
Quote from: Thetrufflehunter on June 20, 2015, 01:40:40 PM
Quote from: DirtyMustachio on June 20, 2015, 01:37:29 PM
You guys see the new guy

*/4

His power is equal to the amount of lands you control

{2}{G}{R}
so {Rubble Hulk}?

I like it.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on June 20, 2015, 03:55:43 PM
Pretty much
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: redwolv on June 20, 2015, 09:16:57 PM
Lili's bro has mechanic to kill himself?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaalia with haste on June 20, 2015, 09:26:39 PM
Quote from: redwolv on June 20, 2015, 09:16:57 PM
Lili's bro has mechanic to kill himself?
What's lilis bro? Couldn't find it on mythicspoiler or reddit
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 20, 2015, 09:58:45 PM
{Ob Nixilus, Let's See which Version} is one of those demons. In the current timeline she's hunting the three demons down. I'm not sure how {The Chain Veil} and Garruk fit in but they do. If I'm not mistaken Liliana has already killed a few of the demons...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 20, 2015, 10:08:02 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 20, 2015, 09:58:45 PM
{Ob Nixilus, Let's See which Version} is one of those demons. In the current timeline she's hunting the three demons down. I'm not sure how {The Chain Veil} and Garruk fit in but they do. If I'm not mistaken Liliana has already killed a few of the demons...

She killed the demons now. And I can't remember about Garruk
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: redwolv on June 20, 2015, 11:28:09 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on June 20, 2015, 11:05:22 PM
Liliana and Gurruk got in that fight on imnistrad, gurruk lost and was killed..  he became black and green, tainted by her magic. If I recall correctly, one of the demons could talk to Gurruk through his tainted nature, and the demon drove him against his friends because they tried to kill him. Something like that

Acutally liliana cursed garruk using the chain veil, making his summoned creatures sickly and twisted. In anger  {Garruk Relentless} Chased her down on innastrad, with the hope of recovering the veil from her so he could be cured, but she eacaped, and he was captured by {Odric, master tactician}. Accussed of a crime he didn't commit he breaks out in a fit of rage and falls fully into the veil curses grasp. (Thus his flip is black and gives a weaker but twisted ((deathtouch)) wolf then before, and is called "veil cursed").

Now he is corrupted fully and still hunting lillina and any planeswalker he comes across as {garruk, apex predator}, obsesed with becoming the ultimate hunter, more beast then man with each new kill.

Edit messed up a bit of the lore, fixed now
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 20, 2015, 11:49:56 PM
And there were four demons, not 3
Two we know of, Kothophed and Griselbrand
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 21, 2015, 07:21:20 AM
πŸ’‘: {moonmist} transforms humans, Origin walkers are double-faced humans, so they'll transform with no loyalty counters on them. Bye walker!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 21, 2015, 08:25:52 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 21, 2015, 07:21:20 AM
πŸ’‘: {moonmist} transforms humans, Origin walkers are double-faced humans, so they'll transform with no loyalty counters on them. Bye walker!

No it'll transform them into their normal PW form
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: griffin131 on June 21, 2015, 08:42:22 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 21, 2015, 08:25:52 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 21, 2015, 07:21:20 AM
πŸ’‘: {moonmist} transforms humans, Origin walkers are double-faced humans, so they'll transform with no loyalty counters on them. Bye walker!

No it'll transform them into their normal PW form
No, it won't.
They won't have counters unless they ETB as a walker, which is why they exile and return transformed.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 21, 2015, 09:28:32 AM
Quote from: griffin131 on June 21, 2015, 08:42:22 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 21, 2015, 08:25:52 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 21, 2015, 07:21:20 AM
πŸ’‘: {moonmist} transforms humans, Origin walkers are double-faced humans, so they'll transform with no loyalty counters on them. Bye walker!

No it'll transform them into their normal PW form
No, it won't.
They won't have counters unless they ETB as a walker, which is why they exile and return transformed.

Really? Do we have a ruling?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: griffin131 on June 21, 2015, 09:37:47 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 21, 2015, 09:28:32 AM
Quote from: griffin131 on June 21, 2015, 08:42:22 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 21, 2015, 08:25:52 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 21, 2015, 07:21:20 AM
πŸ’‘: {moonmist} transforms humans, Origin walkers are double-faced humans, so they'll transform with no loyalty counters on them. Bye walker!

No it'll transform them into their normal PW form
No, it won't.
They won't have counters unless they ETB as a walker, which is why they exile and return transformed.

Really? Do we have a ruling?
209.1. (http://imtgapp.com/forum/index.php?action=imtg;area=rule;number=209.1.): Each planeswalker card has a loyalty number printed in its lower right corner. This indicates its loyalty while it's not on the battlefield, and it also indicates that the planeswalker enters the battlefield with that many loyalty counters on it.

PWs get counters on ETB.
No ETB, no counters. No counters is a sad Planeswalker.
Tabak answered the same thing but I'm too lazy to find the link.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: InfinitiveDivinity on June 21, 2015, 12:56:48 PM
Quote from: griffin131 on June 21, 2015, 09:37:47 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 21, 2015, 09:28:32 AM
Quote from: griffin131 on June 21, 2015, 08:42:22 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 21, 2015, 08:25:52 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 21, 2015, 07:21:20 AM
πŸ’‘: {moonmist} transforms humans, Origin walkers are double-faced humans, so they'll transform with no loyalty counters on them. Bye walker!

No it'll transform them into their normal PW form
No, it won't.
They won't have counters unless they ETB as a walker, which is why they exile and return transformed.

Really? Do we have a ruling?
209.1. (http://imtgapp.com/forum/index.php?action=imtg;area=rule;number=209.1.): Each planeswalker card has a loyalty number printed in its lower right corner. This indicates its loyalty while it's not on the battlefield, and it also indicates that the planeswalker enters the battlefield with that many loyalty counters on it.

PWs get counters on ETB.
No ETB, no counters. No counters is a sad Planeswalker.
Tabak answered the same thing but I'm too lazy to find the link.
The only one it doesn't kill is Nissa
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 21, 2015, 01:04:17 PM
Quote from: InfinitiveDivinity on June 21, 2015, 12:56:48 PM
Quote from: griffin131 on June 21, 2015, 09:37:47 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 21, 2015, 09:28:32 AM
Quote from: griffin131 on June 21, 2015, 08:42:22 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 21, 2015, 08:25:52 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 21, 2015, 07:21:20 AM
πŸ’‘: {moonmist} transforms humans, Origin walkers are double-faced humans, so they'll transform with no loyalty counters on them. Bye walker!

No it'll transform them into their normal PW form
No, it won't.
They won't have counters unless they ETB as a walker, which is why they exile and return transformed.

Really? Do we have a ruling?
209.1. (http://imtgapp.com/forum/index.php?action=imtg;area=rule;number=209.1.): Each planeswalker card has a loyalty number printed in its lower right corner. This indicates its loyalty while it's not on the battlefield, and it also indicates that the planeswalker enters the battlefield with that many loyalty counters on it.

PWs get counters on ETB.
No ETB, no counters. No counters is a sad Planeswalker.
Tabak answered the same thing but I'm too lazy to find the link.
The only one it doesn't kill is Nissa
True. We'll just have to send Garruk after her then..
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaalia with haste on June 22, 2015, 11:03:30 AM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 22, 2015, 10:19:14 AM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on June 22, 2015, 09:59:27 AM
The demon that gave liliana her powers... kotheped or whatever is the black legendary

3BB

6/6 flier

When a permanent an opponent controls goes to graveyard, draw a card and lose a life

It doesn't say may...

Drop a ton of tokens, board wipe, demon controller dies with a full hand :)
It's relevant that it's actually 4BB, I saw your post and thought he might be really good and that I misread him, but I checked, he's 6 mana, sorry kids we don't have a 5 mana 6/6 flying with an upside :(
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 22, 2015, 11:42:57 AM
Quote from: bravado883 on June 22, 2015, 11:01:49 AM
Mmmmmm...sweepers.

Languish--{2}{B}{B}
Sorcery
All creatures get -4/-4 until end of turn.
I like that one with the demon.
Or some evil sac-cycle. What was that raid-guy that returned from the grave again?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on June 22, 2015, 11:45:37 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 22, 2015, 11:42:57 AM
Quote from: bravado883 on June 22, 2015, 11:01:49 AM
Mmmmmm...sweepers.

Languish--{2}{B}{B}
Sorcery
All creatures get -4/-4 until end of turn.
I like that one with the demon.
Or some evil sac-cycle. What was that raid-guy that returned from the grave again?

{bloodsoaked champion}
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 22, 2015, 11:49:11 AM
Quote from: DirtyMustachio on June 22, 2015, 11:45:37 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 22, 2015, 11:42:57 AM
Quote from: bravado883 on June 22, 2015, 11:01:49 AM
Mmmmmm...sweepers.

Languish--{2}{B}{B}
Sorcery
All creatures get -4/-4 until end of turn.
I like that one with the demon.
Or some evil sac-cycle. What was that raid-guy that returned from the grave again?

{bloodsoaked champion}
Tx. With some way to generate mana off his demise, he can die quite a lot.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on June 22, 2015, 12:07:26 PM
{springleaf drum} maybe?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Splicer on June 22, 2015, 01:13:14 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 22, 2015, 12:58:04 PM
OMG

Languish
{2}{B}{B}
ALL creatures get -4/-4 until end of turn
Sorcery

Esper control gonna be happy...
Yes I am...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Splicer on June 22, 2015, 01:15:09 PM
Quote from: Taysby on June 22, 2015, 01:13:39 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 22, 2015, 12:58:04 PM
OMG

Languish
{2}{B}{B}
ALL creatures get -4/-4 until end of turn
Sorcery

Esper control gonna be happy...

WHY U NO {DAMNATION}?!?!?!?!
Because I have {wrath of god}, and NOT $50 to spend on a single.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 22, 2015, 02:29:12 PM
Well that thing kills most of standard
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 22, 2015, 04:06:24 PM
Renowned seems cool but bad to me. Spell Mastery just might be my all time favorite mechanic.

There seems to be a ton of U/W tempo cards. If we get a decent finisher it could be a thing.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 22, 2015, 04:24:39 PM
Quote from: Potticus on June 22, 2015, 04:10:41 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 22, 2015, 02:29:12 PM
Well that thing kills most of standard

Except siege rhino.

And tasgiur. Abzan control got a nice one sided board wipe.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 22, 2015, 05:07:47 PM
Guess wiz really want people to play junk this last cycle
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 23, 2015, 11:33:17 AM
Tainted remedy is such a flavorful card!!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 23, 2015, 11:38:11 AM
I like how they reprinted {demonic tutor} in a sneaky way.
{3}{B}{B} - search library for a card, if 2 instant/sorcery cards in grave, get {B}x3.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Remillo on June 23, 2015, 12:06:40 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 23, 2015, 11:38:11 AM
I like how they reprinted {demonic tutor} in a sneaky way.
{3}{B}{B} - search library for a card, if 2 instant/sorcery cards in grave, get {B}x3.

Still costs 5 and not 2!

But damn, Tainted Remedy is a functionally fixed {Rain of Gore} and pairs nicely with {Beacon of Immortality}.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: The Keeper on June 23, 2015, 12:16:21 PM
Does anybody know if slivers will be brought back in origins?? Not like they did in m14/m15 but like they were in tempest/stronghold
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 23, 2015, 12:18:21 PM
Damn new type of {opalescence} card. Oh the rules shenanigans!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 23, 2015, 12:33:06 PM
Oh wow!!! A damn near  {Timetwister} reprint! Too bad it ends your turn if used on your turn.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Falcon182 on June 23, 2015, 01:41:19 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on June 23, 2015, 12:33:06 PM
Oh wow!!! A damn near  {Timetwister} reprint! Too bad it ends your turn if used on your turn.

I can't see many decks running this, unfortunately.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 23, 2015, 03:33:37 PM
Quote from: The Keeper on June 23, 2015, 12:16:21 PM
Does anybody know if slivers will be brought back in origins?? Not like they did in m14/m15 but like they were in tempest/stronghold
Nope. Wrong time, wrong planes.
Those slivers lived at Rath, and I believe it was before the Shattering.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 23, 2015, 03:39:30 PM
Quote from: Taysby on June 23, 2015, 02:33:22 PM
Quote from: Falcon182 on June 23, 2015, 01:41:19 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on June 23, 2015, 12:33:06 PM
Oh wow!!! A damn near  {Timetwister} reprint! Too bad it ends your turn if used on your turn.

I can't see many decks running this, unfortunately.

Play it in blue red burn. They cast their stuff at instant speed anyways.

The problem is, will your new hand beat theirs? Maybe in a burn shell as a finisher. Not in a control shell, to dangerous. Even with a {Niv-Mizzet, the Firemind} reprint (not happening) I can't see it in any other decks.

Maybe if will is a thing for that enchantment? Mill 14 and fresh cards?

Nevermind it shuffles graveyards back in.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 23, 2015, 05:18:26 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 23, 2015, 03:39:30 PM
Quote from: Taysby on June 23, 2015, 02:33:22 PM
Quote from: Falcon182 on June 23, 2015, 01:41:19 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on June 23, 2015, 12:33:06 PM
Oh wow!!! A damn near  {Timetwister} reprint! Too bad it ends your turn if used on your turn.

I can't see many decks running this, unfortunately.

Play it in blue red burn. They cast their stuff at instant speed anyways.

The problem is, will your new hand beat theirs? Maybe in a burn shell as a finisher. Not in a control shell, to dangerous. Even with a {Niv-Mizzet, the Firemind} reprint (not happening) I can't see it in any other decks.

Maybe if will is a thing for that enchantment? Mill 14 and fresh cards?

Nevermind it shuffles graveyards back in.

However, Nekusar EDH just got it as a new toy πŸ’€
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Remillo on June 23, 2015, 07:04:43 PM
Just do you know, if the Turn Ends, none of your Chasm Skulker or Nekusar or new-Grindstoneish triggers will get to resolve.  You just move to Clean-Up where nothing gets placed on the stack.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 23, 2015, 07:29:56 PM
Quote from: Remillo on June 23, 2015, 07:04:43 PM
Just do you know, if the Turn Ends, none of your Chasm Skulker or Nekusar or new-Grindstoneish triggers will get to resolve.  You just move to Clean-Up where nothing gets placed on the stack.
That's why you have  {Leyline of Anticipation} and  {Vedalken Orrery}!!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: griffin131 on June 23, 2015, 09:23:46 PM
Quote from: Remillo on June 23, 2015, 07:04:43 PM
Just do you know, if the Turn Ends, none of your Chasm Skulker or Nekusar or new-Grindstoneish triggers will get to resolve.  You just move to Clean-Up where nothing gets placed on the stack.
Things can go on the stack in Cleanup - Madness has to be able to, for example.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Sto5rm on June 23, 2015, 11:09:33 PM
They just released the art for game day promos.

And a mostly full art foil Languish for game day looks absolutely INSANE!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: cltrn81 on June 23, 2015, 11:36:20 PM
Mana glutton hydra is broke imo

{2}{G}

Trample
whenever a player casts a spell, put a +1/1 counter on MGH

1/1
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Deebiia on June 23, 2015, 11:41:18 PM
Quote from: cltrn81 on June 23, 2015, 11:36:20 PM
Mana glutton hydra is broke imo

{2}{G}

Trample
whenever a player casts a spell, put a +1/1 counter on MGH

1/1
*v*

I know. Isn't it beautiful.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: cltrn81 on June 23, 2015, 11:43:26 PM
That trample just puts it over the top on power level.  There has not been a better green creature to create a clock like this since {primordial hydra}
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Deebiia on June 23, 2015, 11:46:18 PM
Quote from: cltrn81 on June 23, 2015, 11:43:26 PM
That trample just puts it over the top on power level.  There has not been a better green creature to create a clock like this since {primordial hydra}
I saw it immediately and was like, meh.. another hydra.. Wait! Does that say trample?!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 24, 2015, 06:46:02 AM
Jaces sanctum {3}{U}
Enchantment
Sorceries and instants cost {1} less to cast

Whenever you cast an Ins or sorc, scry 1.

I like it, would be much better if 3 drop tho
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 24, 2015, 09:29:31 AM
MGH is meh and very meh. 3 mana for a charging badger that might become a 2/2 or 3/3 before you swing with it and with giant growth type effects it's cool but in the end it's ΓΌber weak without much protection
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: lotrwk on June 24, 2015, 10:22:23 AM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 24, 2015, 09:29:31 AM
MGH is meh and very meh. 3 mana for a charging badger that might become a 2/2 or 3/3 before you swing with it and with giant growth type effects it's cool but in the end it's ΓΌber weak without much protection
Yup
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: cltrn81 on June 24, 2015, 11:12:34 AM
I am a fan of MGH.  The opponent has to answer it or they will just feed the beast.  It would be better if it was {1}{G} and a 0/1 creature :)
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on June 24, 2015, 11:37:25 AM
Quote from: cltrn81 on June 23, 2015, 11:43:26 PM
That trample just puts it over the top on power level.  There has not been a better green creature to create a clock like this since {primordial hydra}

{Kalonian hydra} wasn't bad
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 24, 2015, 12:17:28 PM
Meh cycle spoiled. 4 creatures and an enchantment that have an effect based on if you control another with the same name (or ones in your graveyard for black).
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 24, 2015, 12:24:51 PM
Quote from: particle on June 24, 2015, 12:17:28 PM
Meh cycle spoiled. 4 creatures and an enchantment that have an effect based on if you control another with the same name (or ones in your graveyard for black).
The white and green ones just want to sync with copy effects, the red enchantment is nice, because you'll draw one and tutor the others if the creature dies, the blue one is a 1 drop flier with card draw if you control another. The black one gives you creatures if you got the others in the graveyard. I think black is somewhat meh, but I see potential for the others.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 24, 2015, 01:10:04 PM
Quote from: DirtyMustachio on June 24, 2015, 11:37:25 AM
Quote from: cltrn81 on June 23, 2015, 11:43:26 PM
That trample just puts it over the top on power level.  There has not been a better green creature to create a clock like this since {primordial hydra}

{Kalonian hydra} wasn't bad

Who hasn't lost or won a game to a {Heroe's Bane} at 64+
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Millionlittlee on June 24, 2015, 01:42:28 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 24, 2015, 01:10:04 PM
Quote from: DirtyMustachio on June 24, 2015, 11:37:25 AM
Quote from: cltrn81 on June 23, 2015, 11:43:26 PM
That trample just puts it over the top on power level.  There has not been a better green creature to create a clock like this since {primordial hydra}

{Kalonian hydra} wasn't bad

Who hasn't lost or won a game to a {Heroe's Bane} at 64+

I won a game with a heroe's bane enchanted with chromanticor
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MommaB on June 25, 2015, 02:10:10 AM
Gotta say I like the way this is looking ... Standard mill is going to happen in my book lol
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kyrosis on June 25, 2015, 02:14:33 AM
What do you guys think of the archangel of tithes? I like it, it seems quite good, but im not sure how well it fits into modern or standard competitive wise
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on June 25, 2015, 04:24:41 AM
I like tithes a lot
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: lotrwk on June 25, 2015, 08:32:49 AM
Made for blocking rhinos.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 25, 2015, 09:14:14 AM
Quote from: bravado883 on June 25, 2015, 08:18:55 AM
Love the angel. That {W}{W}{W} in the casting cost though...
We'll see how it fares against a standard full of dragons. Once they rotate though...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 25, 2015, 12:28:34 PM
Well now those pain lands may shoot back up since they won't be rotating
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Estel2931 on June 25, 2015, 02:09:26 PM
{Woodland Bellower}, {Demonic Pact}...some little goodies
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 25, 2015, 03:08:16 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 25, 2015, 12:28:34 PM
Well now those pain lands may shoot back up since they won't be rotating

Just traded most of mine...still have {Yavimaya Coast} I think.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 25, 2015, 04:34:14 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 25, 2015, 02:21:49 PM
Quote from: Estel2931 on June 25, 2015, 02:09:26 PM
{Demonic Pact}...some little goodies

gotta watch that last one, its a doosie...
Use the first three abilities... Then {donate} it
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 25, 2015, 05:16:24 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on June 25, 2015, 04:34:14 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 25, 2015, 02:21:49 PM
Quote from: Estel2931 on June 25, 2015, 02:09:26 PM
{Demonic Pact}...some little goodies

gotta watch that last one, its a doosie...
Use the first three abilities... Then {donate} it

{Bazaar Trader} reprint in Battle for Zendikar please.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on June 25, 2015, 05:42:51 PM
Or I dunno, skip your upkeep/blink it
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on June 25, 2015, 06:05:49 PM
I think pact should have said End Step
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 25, 2015, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on June 25, 2015, 06:05:49 PM
I think pact should have said End Step

Drawing 2 cards at end step is much worse.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on June 25, 2015, 06:10:31 PM
Quote from: particle on June 25, 2015, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on June 25, 2015, 06:05:49 PM
I think pact should have said End Step

Drawing 2 cards at end step is much worse.
But that's the only one that's much worse.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 25, 2015, 08:30:51 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on June 25, 2015, 06:10:31 PM
Quote from: particle on June 25, 2015, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on June 25, 2015, 06:05:49 PM
I think pact should have said End Step

Drawing 2 cards at end step is much worse.
But that's the only one that's much worse.

Yes but none of them get any better by being at your end step. 4 damage could {clear a path} for blockers. And making them discard in your upkeep has the potential to make them discard counters or other interactive spells.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 26, 2015, 02:03:05 AM
That's pretty legit
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Remillo on June 26, 2015, 02:13:43 AM
Sweeeet.  One of the most value-ful 2-drops is getting a reprint.  I like it.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 26, 2015, 02:26:45 AM
I'm excited White Weenie is actually looking pretty sweet!!

Also it being reprinted think cards like  {Mistveil Plains} might get reprinted in BfZ? I don't mean necessarily MP but maybe a non basic plains card
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 26, 2015, 02:41:07 AM
But... It does die to removal
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 26, 2015, 10:06:20 AM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 26, 2015, 02:41:07 AM
But... It does die to removal

Lol indeed but at least you potentially {Rampant Growthed} so it has made some impact on your board :)
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 26, 2015, 10:50:33 AM
{goblin piledriver} and lots of elves. Including a black one drop who makes green mana to cast elves spells, at the cost of one life, and can gives an attacking elf you control death touch.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Ace on June 26, 2015, 11:26:47 AM
So with goblin pile driver being modern legal now, will this make modern goblins a thing again? 
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 26, 2015, 11:36:50 AM
Quote from: Ace on June 26, 2015, 11:26:47 AM
So with goblin pile driver being modern legal now, will this make modern goblins a thing again?

Without {goblin matron} or {goblin ringleader} joining him I doubt it.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Ekann1 on June 26, 2015, 01:27:12 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 26, 2015, 02:26:45 AM
I'm excited White Weenie is actually looking pretty sweet!!
YES! YES PLEASE!! Although no brave the elements is a little awkward...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on June 26, 2015, 01:28:54 PM
Quote from: Ace on June 26, 2015, 11:26:47 AM
So with goblin pile driver being modern legal now, will this make modern goblins a thing again?
Rabblemaster's gonna go through the roof while they're both standard legsl
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Ekann1 on June 26, 2015, 03:22:02 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on June 26, 2015, 01:28:54 PM
Quote from: Ace on June 26, 2015, 11:26:47 AM
So with goblin pile driver being modern legal now, will this make modern goblins a thing again?
Rabblemaster's gonna go through the roof while they're both standard legsl
That's going to be until the fall right?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 27, 2015, 04:16:57 AM
New eternal Merfolk?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: General Kiwi on June 27, 2015, 05:56:05 AM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 27, 2015, 04:16:57 AM
New eternal Merfolk?
Uuhhh yes sir
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 27, 2015, 06:25:34 AM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 27, 2015, 04:16:57 AM
New eternal Merfolk?
It's decent. I'll have to test it. It will replace 1-2 Tidebinders and maybe 1 Dismember. It won't be a 4-of
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 27, 2015, 09:47:57 AM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on June 27, 2015, 06:25:34 AM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 27, 2015, 04:16:57 AM
New eternal Merfolk?
It's decent. I'll have to test it. It will replace 1-2 Tidebinders and maybe 1 Dismember. It won't be a 4-of

I think it will replace zero cards in my merfolk deck. Just bouncing is ok but not that great. {tidebinder mage} locks down most relevant threats and {dismember} kills everything else. 4 mana is a ton for merfolk to devote to any one spell, and I think {master of waves} is the only spell worth it. Dismember is good because you can cast it for 1 mana and it kills everything (except Geist). Paying 4 mana seems way to expensive for any kind of effect on eternal merfolk.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 27, 2015, 09:54:38 AM
Quote from: particle on June 27, 2015, 09:47:57 AM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on June 27, 2015, 06:25:34 AM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on June 27, 2015, 04:16:57 AM
New eternal Merfolk?
It's decent. I'll have to test it. It will replace 1-2 Tidebinders and maybe 1 Dismember. It won't be a 4-of

I think it will replace zero cards in my merfolk deck. Just bouncing is ok but not that great. {tidebinder mage} locks down most relevant threats and {dismember} kills everything else. 4 mana is a ton for merfolk to devote to any one spell, and I think {master of waves} is the only spell worth it. Dismember is good because you can cast it for 1 mana and it kills everything (except Geist). Paying 4 mana seems way to expensive for any kind of effect on eternal merfolk.
I hate typing things at work early in the morning... I meant to say "might replace 1-2 tide infer"
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on June 29, 2015, 12:09:40 AM
Two cards Id like to talk about
Archangel of tithes

Vryn Wingmare
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 29, 2015, 02:46:52 AM
Taxes, pillowfort. Nice.
However, the Wingmare seems quite fragile at 2/1.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 29, 2015, 03:51:43 AM
So lets talk about {hallowed moonlight}

{containment priest} as an instant/cantrip

Need to preorder a ton of this

Collected company is done
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 29, 2015, 08:14:29 AM
What about side boarding for show and tell?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on June 29, 2015, 10:56:46 AM
And the exile card named: good bye ojutai and raptors and rhinos
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on June 29, 2015, 12:21:11 PM
Quote from: Kaylesh on June 29, 2015, 02:46:52 AM
Taxes, pillowfort. Nice.
However, the Wingmare seems quite fragile at 2/1.
Wingmare is Thalia with flying instead of first strike. But I get your point
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 29, 2015, 12:42:32 PM
Too bad it's just too expensive to run in burn.
Could get a slot in my anarchy deck. It doesn't have enough copy effects yet ;)
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: cltrn81 on June 29, 2015, 01:51:15 PM
I am more excited about {molten vortex}.  Hello {land tax} decks for legacy.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 02:44:40 PM
Okay so I'm attending prerelease for Orgins (yay!). We're doing two headed giant so I'd like advice on synergetic colours.

My dad and a family friend are going G/B respectively. Black has a fair chunk of removal and decent low cost creatures. Green has a fair amount of ramp, elf synergy and big nasties. The idea is black paves the way while green smashes face. I like it. The bonus is they might pull of B/G elves in which case one of them can switch colours or something.

I feel like if I was going solo I'd go mono white and look at making W/U or W/R tempo. White has a lot of tap effects and a fairly large amount of efficient creatures. Blue has lots of tempo and some flying finishers. Red's burn is a little lacklustre but I feel like some solid creatures make up for it. However I'm not going solo and tempo is a bad 2HG deck 9/10 times.

I feel like R/G is pretty solid. I also feel like W/B is pretty solid. Of course I always build around what I crack but I need to know what colours to register with.



Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 04:55:53 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 29, 2015, 03:41:06 PM
New artifact for Chandra

Chandra mentions Jaya!!!!!!

Did the two ever meet?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 29, 2015, 05:28:05 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 04:55:53 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 29, 2015, 03:41:06 PM
New artifact for Chandra

Chandra mentions Jaya!!!!!!

Did the two ever meet?

The flavour text reads "I hope to meet Jaya Ballard someday. I think we'd get along" so I'm gunna go with no
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 05:32:58 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 29, 2015, 05:28:05 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 04:55:53 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 29, 2015, 03:41:06 PM
New artifact for Chandra

Chandra mentions Jaya!!!!!!

Did the two ever meet?

The flavour text reads "I hope to meet Jaya Ballard someday. I think we'd get along" so I'm gunna go with no

This is Orgins, so this was presumably a long time ago.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Ace on June 29, 2015, 06:42:17 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 05:32:58 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 29, 2015, 05:28:05 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 04:55:53 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 29, 2015, 03:41:06 PM
New artifact for Chandra

Chandra mentions Jaya!!!!!!

Did the two ever meet?

The flavour text reads "I hope to meet Jaya Ballard someday. I think we'd get along" so I'm gunna go with no

This is Orgins, so this was presumably a long time ago.

Well chandra and jaya both have those goggles...so I think we can assume the goggles worn by them are the same ones. So sense it is origins, I'm guessing that eventually do meet and chandra is given the goggles by jaya
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 06:43:48 PM
I'll be super happy if she gets a print in Origins.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 29, 2015, 07:00:04 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 29, 2015, 06:47:27 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 06:43:48 PM
I'll be super happy if she gets a print in Origins.

that would be so much Vorthos win/fun
Well, the Keral Keep monestary where Chandra learned to control her fiery stuff was founded by Jaya...

Something else interesting.
Gideon is from Theros, whose primary god is Heliod.
The Order of Heliud, to which Gideon was a member, was founded on Regatha.
Regatha was the plane Chandra first walked to.
So if Heliod=Heliud, then maybe there are more Theros tie-ins (or walkers from Theros)
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on June 29, 2015, 07:32:53 PM
Didn't Gideon arrest Chandra and make her walk through the Purifying Fire or something?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on June 30, 2015, 06:12:07 AM
Quote from: CbStrad on June 29, 2015, 11:09:34 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 05:32:58 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 29, 2015, 05:28:05 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 29, 2015, 04:55:53 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 29, 2015, 03:41:06 PM
New artifact for Chandra

Chandra mentions Jaya!!!!!!

Did the two ever meet?

The flavour text reads "I hope to meet Jaya Ballard someday. I think we'd get along" so I'm gunna go with no

This is Orgins, so this was presumably a long time ago.
Though, since Sarkhan decided to screw with the timestream, it's anyone's guess at this point
Sarkhan screwing with the time stream only affects Tarkir... Not the rest of the Multiverse
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on June 30, 2015, 09:19:02 AM
Well, it affects the multiverse in the fact that Bolas didn't kill off Ugin. The effect to Tarkir was that the Dragons are back. However, I think BfZ could showcase some effects for Zendikar. (It was after killing Ugin that Bolas started his schemes to free the Eldrazi right?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on June 30, 2015, 03:47:09 PM
Quote from: Noblellama on June 30, 2015, 01:15:29 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on June 30, 2015, 12:55:59 PM
Priest of the sacred rite

5 mana
2/2
enters with a 5/5 demon flier
lose 2 life at upkeep

Damn good

Oh heck yeah, cast him and start swinging with him, either they take the damage from the attack or you get him killed, win win

Want some blink effects.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Deebiia on June 30, 2015, 03:54:20 PM
Porque no los dos?

I love {Pyromancer Goggles}! A little costly, but if you'd get it out... That's awesome. The dude that drops in a 5/5 is suuuper cool. {Cloudshift} him and/or {Wake the Reflections} make him really sweet. May make an Orzhov deck for em. I like the Zombie that makes zombie tokens for how many of him are in the graveyard. That makes my zombie deck able to pump zombies out so {Endless Ranks of the Dead} has power-- BEGIN THE MACHINE! A lot of cool cards. The {Days of Undoing} I can see being in a discard-esque deck. Is that weird? I like.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 30, 2015, 04:02:02 PM
{Day's Undoing} does combo wombo with {Fate Unraveler}. End my turn for seven damage? Okay.

I like the zombie token guy in {Necromancer's Stockpile} and Sidisi decks for standard. If he does well he may stay in my casual Sidisi deck.

{Pyromancer's Goggles} are badass. They're five mana because screw red they can't actually be good. (Looking at you, {Pyromancer's Gauntlets}). However they will be in all my red inclusive EDH decks as well as joining my playset of {Pyromancer's Gauntlets} in my multiplayer burn deck. Casting {Flames of the Firebrand} with {Pyromancer's Gauntlets} out and a bonus copy from {Pyromancer's Goggles}? It may be 13 mana for situational 18 damage but it feels good. (And you can get value out of the artifacts for the remainder of the game.)
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Deebiia on June 30, 2015, 05:32:19 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 30, 2015, 04:02:02 PM
{Day's Undoing} does combo wombo with {Fate Unraveler}. End my turn for seven damage? Okay.

I like the zombie token guy in {Necromancer's Stockpile} and Sidisi decks for standard. If he does well he may stay in my casual Sidisi deck.

{Pyromancer's Goggles} are badass. They're five mana because screw red they can't actually be good. (Looking at you, {Pyromancer's Gauntlets}). However they will be in all my red inclusive EDH decks as well as joining my playset of {Pyromancer's Gauntlets} in my multiplayer burn deck. Casting {Flames of the Firebrand} with {Pyromancer's Gauntlets} out and a bonus copy from {Pyromancer's Goggles}? It may be 13 mana for situational 18 damage but it feels good. (And you can get value out of the artifacts for the remainder of the game.)
I may be wrong, but {Days Undoing} ends the turn and exiles the stack. If you'd do it on an opponents turn, then yeah that'd work.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 30, 2015, 05:40:11 PM
Quote from: Deebiia on June 30, 2015, 05:32:19 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on June 30, 2015, 04:02:02 PM
{Day's Undoing} does combo wombo with {Fate Unraveler}. End my turn for seven damage? Okay.

I like the zombie token guy in {Necromancer's Stockpile} and Sidisi decks for standard. If he does well he may stay in my casual Sidisi deck.

{Pyromancer's Goggles} are badass. They're five mana because screw red they can't actually be good. (Looking at you, {Pyromancer's Gauntlets}). However they will be in all my red inclusive EDH decks as well as joining my playset of {Pyromancer's Gauntlets} in my multiplayer burn deck. Casting {Flames of the Firebrand} with {Pyromancer's Gauntlets} out and a bonus copy from {Pyromancer's Goggles}? It may be 13 mana for situational 18 damage but it feels good. (And you can get value out of the artifacts for the remainder of the game.)
I may be wrong, but {Days Undoing} ends the turn and exiles the stack. If you'd do it on an opponents turn, then yeah that'd work.

You may be right...idk.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 30, 2015, 06:21:30 PM
I'm still trying to pick up 2...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on July 01, 2015, 08:13:05 AM
Black got a creature that actually crushes the vanilla test and has no downsides (except maybe mana cost (but devotion!))!
{titan of erebos}
{1BBB}
Indestructible if an opp controls no creatures
Whenever an creature leaves an opponents graveyard you may discard, if you do return Titan to you hand
5/5
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on July 01, 2015, 01:02:43 PM
Quote from: bravado883 on July 01, 2015, 08:45:49 AM
It looks like they really want to push devotion for these last few months of Theros. Lots of 3-pip casting costs in this set.

Not in love with most of the cards (though some could turn out sweet), but this is the first set where I feel they REALLY nailed the mythics. Pretty much all of them FEEL mythic, which is awesome. Also feeling the EDH love in this set.

I agree about the devotion. After all these multicolour decks I approve.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Rasser on July 01, 2015, 01:55:08 PM
{Magmatic Insight}  yes please.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: particle on July 01, 2015, 03:25:20 PM
Sick art for {fleshbag marauder}!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on July 01, 2015, 03:53:54 PM
For the short period of time that it's all in standard...Ensoul Blast might have the support it's been looking for. Idk about you guys but I'm hype to try it.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on July 01, 2015, 09:30:18 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on July 01, 2015, 08:56:01 PM
I'd give the spoilers thus far a solid B. Some cards are really dumb good yet others are just straight dumb. Also, does anybody else find it weird a NEW keywords was put in a core set? Like.. did this every happen before? I'm talking about Renown, not that Menace
And the flip walkers aren't exactly the easiest thing for new players to understand.

And that Nyx herald or whatever looks super strong.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on July 02, 2015, 12:47:33 AM
Ok... Tragic Arrogance seems insane
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on July 02, 2015, 01:02:57 AM
Quote from: Munchlax on July 02, 2015, 12:47:33 AM
Ok... Tragic Arrogance seems insane

Nonland lol :P
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on July 02, 2015, 08:47:28 AM
Omg constellation hard

{Sigil of the empty yhrone}in standard!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Brawler_1337 on July 02, 2015, 11:39:10 AM
{Smash to Smithereens} and {Celestial Flare} reprints! Good news for cube, bad news for my {Ensoul Artifact} deck, since I already have a tough enough time against red decks.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Splicer on July 02, 2015, 04:05:16 PM
Quote from: bravado883 on July 02, 2015, 03:34:48 PM
Oh noooo! {Celestial Flare} and {Languish} are pulling me in opposite directions. I really want a viable U/W control deck and {Celestial Flare} is soooo good; however, {Languish} puts U/B over the top, and it's probably the better deck. Oh, choices.
Go esper.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: DirtyMustachio on July 02, 2015, 04:53:11 PM
Thank you God for granting me celestial flare
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on July 02, 2015, 06:19:39 PM
All the artifact love. Unce. So hype.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: rarehuntertay on July 03, 2015, 12:22:48 PM
Where is  {Storm Crow}??!!
You can't have an Origin set with Storm Crow!!!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on July 03, 2015, 12:56:56 PM
Possessed skaab is pretty good
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Indianslayer on July 04, 2015, 04:35:32 AM
{Animists Awakening}, what do you think about this card for bloom decks?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Mattao19 on July 04, 2015, 09:51:03 AM
Quote from: Indianslayer on July 04, 2015, 04:35:32 AM
{Animists Awakening}, what do you think about this card for bloom decks?

Beyond unplayable
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on July 06, 2015, 09:19:50 AM
Wow sigil starfish got upgraded
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on July 06, 2015, 03:06:26 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on July 06, 2015, 09:19:50 AM
Wow sigil starfish got upgraded

I'm not seeing it?
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on July 06, 2015, 04:03:08 PM
Hardly worth it. xD
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on July 06, 2015, 06:39:32 PM
If only it was a 0/5...
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on July 06, 2015, 06:50:59 PM
Blocks rabble master
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on July 06, 2015, 07:35:29 PM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on July 06, 2015, 06:50:59 PM
Blocks rabble master

Not profitably
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on July 06, 2015, 08:02:30 PM
Yeah it does
Block
Response to damage
Scry
Boom
Profit city
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on July 06, 2015, 08:22:11 PM
Hardly worth it.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on July 06, 2015, 09:34:17 PM
I like it, I have a playset. It's just not a very good card.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: LinkCelestrial on July 06, 2015, 09:49:18 PM
C'mon now. It's no {Bronze Sable}.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Coolie2 on July 07, 2015, 01:37:30 AM
Why r u all talkin about {Bronze Sable} ? It's not that good a card....
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on July 07, 2015, 01:42:50 AM
Forum joke
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: PapaBudz on July 07, 2015, 03:32:29 AM
Quote from: Coolie2 on July 07, 2015, 01:37:30 AM
Why r u all talkin about {Bronze Sable} ? It's not that good a card....
Noble, show this gentleman your collection.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Ekann1 on July 07, 2015, 07:42:24 AM
Quote from: MuggyWuggy on July 07, 2015, 01:42:50 AM
Forum joke
How dare you call it a joke!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on July 07, 2015, 07:45:29 AM
{storm crow} dies to {bronze sable}. Respect the Sable!
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Remillo on July 07, 2015, 11:43:09 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on July 07, 2015, 07:45:29 AM
{storm crow} dies to {bronze sable}. Respect the Sable!

But Bronze Sable also dies to Storm Crow!  And this the universe is kept in balance.
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Kaylesh on July 07, 2015, 12:17:57 PM
Quote from: Remillo on July 07, 2015, 11:43:09 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on July 07, 2015, 07:45:29 AM
{storm crow} dies to {bronze sable}. Respect the Sable!

But Bronze Sable also dies to Storm Crow!  And this the universe is kept in balance.

{Darksteel Forge} disagrees. ;)
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on July 07, 2015, 04:11:48 PM
Storm crow flys
So that's pretty OP
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: MuggyWuggy on July 07, 2015, 07:59:09 PM
1000000000 storm crows will live with a {golgari charm}

Sable crumbles
Title: Re: Magic: Origins (Speculation and Spoilers)
Post by: Munchlax on July 09, 2015, 10:09:43 PM
Quote from: Taysby on July 07, 2015, 08:23:52 PM
http://www.channelfireball.com/articles/woodland-bellower-combo/
I didn't even know that {Painter's Servant} was modern legal