Naya Blitz

[Hunteroffire9]

99/100 maybe you should
Play against
Someone who plays junk rites well.

[Opticarrow8]

99/100 maybe you should
Play against
Someone who plays junk rites well.

I did last night, still beat him 2/1
He's won so many tournaments with that deck...

[Dudecore]

I went 4-0 with my Esper list on MTGO Thursday, then went 1-3 today with the exact same list. Sometimes you run into a bad matchup, sometimes things don't go your way. Variance is sort of the fun of the game, it's also one of the more annoying things. I know the deck should be more consistent then that.

[Dudecore]

I can beat Rites. Most of the time (not all) I don't have a problem with that matchup. I do have a problem if I get my lands grenaded by {Acidic Slime}, but that is usually post board.

[Hunteroffire9]

I can beat Rites. Most of the time (not all) I don't have a problem with that matchup. I do have a problem if I get my lands grenaded by {Acidic Slime}, but that is usually post board.

if the meta is heavy control then i run 3-4 main board and take out thrag
Other way around if its aggro. Midrange,i also
Use slime. And resto works
With both:)

[Opticarrow8]

99/100 maybe you should
Play against
Someone who plays junk rites well.

I've never dropped a game to naya blitz with junk rites. I'm 3-0 matches.
I'm also 3-0 playing my brew of esper control. I usually 2-1 them however.

As far as 99/100, that's a laugh. Obviously not a real statistic. Magic is a game of numbers, mathematically there are games where you will be mana flooded, or never draw one. It happens to everyone.

Also, naya blitz has yet to win first at my store, I guess that's what happens when you have quality players like multiple SCG top8ers and winners as well as a guy that just qualified for the pro tour.

My personal favorite game I had against blitz was holding them off one one cycle of rites, 1 centaur healer and a resto angle until I hit serenity and won.

Naya blitz is in no way consistent, nothing that runs 24 lands ever is. My esper control isn't even consistent.

You got your 99/100 statistic out of 4 fnm's. so that's 25 games an FNM or 8 and 1/3 rounds an FNM. Man that's one hell of a store.
Going 4-0 at an FNM doesn't mean your deck is the greatest thing ever. It's all dependent on matchups and people you play.

Do i give a flying .love. what your store has? Nope, and not once did i mention that apl of these games were in tournament format. I played 100 games, Casual and fnm standard, and happened to win 99 of them. Just because you dont believe me doesnt give you the right to bash me or my deck based on personal opinions. I have the record, enough said. I dont care what you think happened or didnt happen.

[MisterJH]

This is drama, dont want no drama drama

[Opticarrow8]

This is drama, dont want no drama drama

Me either.. Why cant i just post my deck for the community without crawler trolls starting .poo.?

[Wsuryanjeska]

99/100 maybe you should
Play against
Someone who plays junk rites well.

I've never dropped a game to naya blitz with junk rites. I'm 3-0 matches.
I'm also 3-0 playing my brew of esper control. I usually 2-1 them however.

As far as 99/100, that's a laugh. Obviously not a real statistic. Magic is a game of numbers, mathematically there are games where you will be mana flooded, or never draw one. It happens to everyone.

Also, naya blitz has yet to win first at my store, I guess that's what happens when you have quality players like multiple SCG top8ers and winners as well as a guy that just qualified for the pro tour.

My personal favorite game I had against blitz was holding them off one one cycle of rites, 1 centaur healer and a resto angle until I hit serenity and won.

Naya blitz is in no way consistent, nothing that runs 24 lands ever is. My esper control isn't even consistent.

You got your 99/100 statistic out of 4 fnm's. so that's 25 games an FNM or 8 and 1/3 rounds an FNM. Man that's one hell of a store.
Going 4-0 at an FNM doesn't mean your deck is the greatest thing ever. It's all dependent on matchups and people you play.

Do i give a flying .love. what your store has? Nope, and not once did i mention that apl of these games were in tournament format. I played 100 games, Casual and fnm standard, and happened to win 99 of them. Just because you dont believe me doesnt give you the right to bash me or my deck based on personal opinions. I have the record, enough said. I dont care what you think happened or didnt happen.

Ohhhh, so you played 100 games against limited decks, now it makes sense. Well, good job I guess?

[Opticarrow8]

99/100 maybe you should
Play against
Someone who plays junk rites well.

I've never dropped a game to naya blitz with junk rites. I'm 3-0 matches.
I'm also 3-0 playing my brew of esper control. I usually 2-1 them however.

As far as 99/100, that's a laugh. Obviously not a real statistic. Magic is a game of numbers, mathematically there are games where you will be mana flooded, or never draw one. It happens to everyone.

Also, naya blitz has yet to win first at my store, I guess that's what happens when you have quality players like multiple SCG top8ers and winners as well as a guy that just qualified for the pro tour.

My personal favorite game I had against blitz was holding them off one one cycle of rites, 1 centaur healer and a resto angle until I hit serenity and won.

Naya blitz is in no way consistent, nothing that runs 24 lands ever is. My esper control isn't even consistent.

You got your 99/100 statistic out of 4 fnm's. so that's 25 games an FNM or 8 and 1/3 rounds an FNM. Man that's one hell of a store.
Going 4-0 at an FNM doesn't mean your deck is the greatest thing ever. It's all dependent on matchups and people you play.

Do i give a flying .love. what your store has? Nope, and not once did i mention that apl of these games were in tournament format. I played 100 games, Casual and fnm standard, and happened to win 99 of them. Just because you dont believe me doesnt give you the right to bash me or my deck based on personal opinions. I have the record, enough said. I dont care what you think happened or didnt happen.

Ohhhh, so you played 100 games against limited decks, now it makes sense. Well, good job I guess?

Yeah i just meant casual games, srry for the confusion.