iMtG Server: Gathering

Magic (The Gathering) => Articles => Topic started by: Thorn on May 16, 2012, 08:35:00 AM

Title: Lucky Cards by Thorn
Post by: Thorn on May 16, 2012, 08:35:00 AM
Today at 02:48:07 AM
Well welcome to CARD REVIEWS.
Since this is the first edition ill begin with an intro. This is an article were I will discuss a certain card. The pros and cons of the card and when to use it. At the end of each article. I will ask you to please post what card you want me to review next. After this first issue please tell me if you would like a daily or weekly article. So on to today's article.

1st up. {Dragon's Claw}
In some cases this card could be good but most of the time you just end up wasting a turn casting an artifact that doesnt directly impact the feild of play. Most red decks rely on speed so spending two mana to gain maybe 5-6 life doesnt seem worth it. However when you are playing a controll deck and your opponent is playing RDW it is really good to sideboard in. Still all in all a much better card for a red deck would be {incinerate} or {stormblood beserker} both of these are better cards than the claw.

This is the first issue. Please tell me if you would like a daily or weekly article.
Now what card do i do next?? Please let me know.
Thanks
-Thorn
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Thorn on May 16, 2012, 08:35:48 AM
This is a test to see how you guys like this. If you do then it will be moved to articles. Some will ne longer and others will be shorter. Thanks
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: BadLuckIrish on May 16, 2012, 09:43:48 AM
 I like reading about peoples opinions on cards and this one is good. It has a really good point. The downside to the article is that its too short. You obviously meant for it to be longer- "1st up:{Dragon's Claw}." But you ended it there. Ill look forward to this and hope there will be more than just 1 card.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Thorn on May 16, 2012, 09:49:52 AM
Yeah mostly this was a test article. On most days I will do multiple cards. The cards i do will be based on which cards you guys ask me to do at the end of each article. So if you like it tell me which card(s) I should reveiw next.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: SpiritedAway on May 16, 2012, 12:39:23 PM
Yes! More articles! More reviews!

I like that you chose such a random card to review instead of the obvious {Temporal Mastery} or whatever.

You should do crazy random cards like {Vizzadrex} and {Orcish Settlers}, don't be afraid to review the most random cards.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Thorn on May 16, 2012, 12:52:27 PM
I might do those next article.  Im glad you enjoy.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Guypocolypse on May 16, 2012, 04:22:35 PM
Quote from: SpiritedAway on May 16, 2012, 12:39:23 PM
{Vizzadrex}
= terrible
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Thorn on May 16, 2012, 04:40:21 PM
Quote from: Guypocolypse on May 16, 2012, 04:22:35 PM
Quote from: SpiritedAway on May 16, 2012, 12:39:23 PM
{Vizzadrex}
= terrible

Well see when i review it...
jk it is pretty bad
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Thorn on May 16, 2012, 09:44:07 PM
I need some cards to do tomorrow.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Guypocolypse on May 16, 2012, 09:45:23 PM
Just do the licky thing for random cards
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Willthomjr on May 16, 2012, 09:52:09 PM
Quote from: Thorn on May 16, 2012, 09:44:07 PM
I need some cards to do tomorrow.

Do a systematic approach. Select every (favorite number like 13?) card from one set or color set and go from there.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Thorn on May 16, 2012, 09:57:39 PM
Actually ill hit the "lucky button" on the app
(thanks piotr) and go from there ;)
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: BadLuckIrish on May 16, 2012, 10:10:28 PM
 just pick any random card. Thats what i think is making this article good. Its just 1 persons review over random cards
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Coffee Vampire on May 16, 2012, 10:23:09 PM
{Mimic Vat}! :D
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Dudecore on May 16, 2012, 11:17:29 PM
{Dragon's Claw} isn't a terrible sack outlet for {Kuldotha Rebirth}. Just so happens that {Shrine of Burning Rage} is better...

I like it, wish it were longer. I like the pro-con thing. Maybe even team up with someone and do a "Pardon the Interruption" with cards, one person for it, another against it. It'd be interesting reading someone's defense of why {Vizzadrex} isn't terrible.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Coffee Vampire on May 16, 2012, 11:21:58 PM
A bored wizard once played a {Vizzadrex} card in a game of Magic: The Gathering. He never made that mistake again.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: BadLuckIrish on May 16, 2012, 11:22:31 PM
Quote from: Dudecore on May 16, 2012, 11:17:29 PM
{Dragon's Claw} isn't a terrible sack outlet for {Kuldotha Rebirth}. Just so happens that {Shrine of Burning Rage} is better...

I like it, wish it were longer. I like the pro-con thing. Maybe even team up with someone and do a "Pardon the Interruption" with cards, one person for it, another against it. It'd be interesting reading someone's defense of why {Vizzadrex} isn't terrible.
This. Id spend all day reading that article.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: BlackJester on May 17, 2012, 12:13:49 AM
Quote from: Dudecore on May 16, 2012, 11:17:29 PM
{Dragon's Claw} isn't a terrible sack outlet for {Kuldotha Rebirth}. Just so happens that {Shrine of Burning Rage} is better...

I like it, wish it were longer. I like the pro-con thing. Maybe even team up with someone and do a "Pardon the Interruption" with cards, one person for it, another against it. It'd be interesting reading someone's defense of why {Vizzadrex} isn't terrible.

Why would you sac the Shrine? ???  That thing is a game finisher!

Re: {Vizzerdrix}

Quote from: BlackJester on April 20, 2012, 05:23:10 PM
Quote from: cltrn81 on April 20, 2012, 05:00:11 PM
My point is that 1 less mana gets you a 6/6 {frost Titan}.  Besides what does blue need a beast for when they have leviathans and krakens?

Well, I don't know if it's fair to compare it to a Titan.  Few things can live up to that.

It's strictly better than a {Ronom Serpent}, {Sea Serpent}, and {Steelclad Serpent} (unless artifacts matter), all for 5U.

{Vizzerdrix} can be a finisher in a blue control deck when the board is locked.  Yes, there are better choices, but there are worse ones too.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Dudecore on May 17, 2012, 12:39:14 AM
Black Jester, you're the perfect guy for this. You make it seem as though a bad card has ever been printed.

Also, you wouldn't sack the {shrine of burning rage} per se, unless you had to. Let's say you had a {goblin grenade} and you don't have a lot invested in the shrine. It's more the "what-if" function of the shrine.

Sometimes in the game of chess, sacrificing your queen is a brilliant move, and sometimes it's your only move.

Also, in fairness to {Vizzadrex}, he was from a different era. He was never good...but he was from a different time. Worst creature is reserved for {Wood Elemental}, the most obviously bad creature.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: BadLuckIrish on May 17, 2012, 12:45:56 AM
Quote from: Dudecore on May 17, 2012, 12:39:14 AM
Black Jester, you're the perfect guy for this. You make it seem as though a bad card has ever been printed.

Also, you wouldn't sack the {shrine of burning rage} per se, unless you had to. Let's say you had a {goblin grenade} and you don't have a lot invested in the shrine. It's more the "what-if" function of the shrine.

Sometimes in the game of chess, sacrificing your queen is a brilliant move, and sometimes it's your only move.

Also, in fairness to {Vizzadrex}, he was from a different era. He was never good...but he was from a different time. Worst creature is reserved for {Wood Elemental}, the most obviously bad creature.
actually paired with {Omnath, the locus of mana} and green mana producing creatures he isnt that bad.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Dudecore on May 17, 2012, 12:48:28 AM
Green Mana isn't forests. {Wood Elemental} stinks. 1 bounce and he ruined your hand forever. He can't be recast.

Edit: And to make matters worse (stupid?) they have to be UNTAPPED forests. It's not enough that you deplete all of your resources for a vanilla creature...they have to be active resources only.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Coffee Vampire on May 17, 2012, 12:51:23 AM
I would use him as a game finisher with {Knight of the Reliquary}. That would be a pretty sick combo! Use it in a deck with fetchlands like {Verdant Catacombs} for a good buildup.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: BadLuckIrish on May 17, 2012, 12:52:25 AM
Quote from: Dudecore on May 17, 2012, 12:48:28 AM
Green Mana isn't forests. {Wood Elemental} stinks. 1 bounce and he ruined your hand forever. He can't be recast.
No but with omnath and say {Llanowar Elves} you dont need forests. Just showing how he can be ok. Not great but ok. Mana ramp forest then sac all of them
Can be like a 8+ easy
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Dudecore on May 17, 2012, 12:55:21 AM
Quote from: BadLuckIrish on May 17, 2012, 12:52:25 AM
Quote from: Dudecore on May 17, 2012, 12:48:28 AM
Green Mana isn't forests. {Wood Elemental} stinks. 1 bounce and he ruined your hand forever. He can't be recast.
No but with omnath and say {Llanowar Elves} you dont need forests. Just showing how he can be ok. Not great but ok. Mana ramp forest then sac all of them
Can be like a 8+ easy

I would love to {Vapor Snag} him so badly...
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: BadLuckIrish on May 17, 2012, 01:00:10 AM
Quote from: Dudecore on May 17, 2012, 12:55:21 AM
Quote from: BadLuckIrish on May 17, 2012, 12:52:25 AM
Quote from: Dudecore on May 17, 2012, 12:48:28 AM
Green Mana isn't forests. {Wood Elemental} stinks. 1 bounce and he ruined your hand forever. He can't be recast.
No but with omnath and say {Llanowar Elves} you dont need forests. Just showing how he can be ok. Not great but ok. Mana ramp forest then sac all of them
Can be like a 8+ easy

I would love to {Vapor Snag} him so badly...
hey theres a counter to everything. Just giving a scenerio in which he CAN be considered useful.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: Dudecore on May 17, 2012, 01:09:57 AM
I like it. I'd like to see you guys defend the legitimacy of {Sea Troll} and {Mogg Squad}.

{Wood Elemental} has a wildly limited, but possible use, {Mogg Squad} just seems unplayable.
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: BadLuckIrish on May 17, 2012, 01:18:11 AM
Quote from: Dudecore on May 17, 2012, 01:09:57 AM
I like it. I'd like to see you guys defend the legitimacy of {Sea Troll} and {Mogg Squad}.

{Wood Elemental} has a wildly limited, but possible use, {Mogg Squad} just seems unplayable.
{Shrine of the Burning Rage}  {Blood Artist} morbid :p
Title: Re: Thorn's Article
Post by: BlackJester on May 17, 2012, 01:39:09 AM
If you want a terrible creature card, @Prophylaxis said it best
Quote from: Prophylaxis on April 23, 2012, 03:32:59 AM
http://www.starcitygames.com/magic/misc/6699_18000_Words_The_100_Worst_Magic_Cards_of_All_Time_201.html

{Shelkin Brownie}. There are NO CREATURES WITH BANDS WITH OTHER AS AN ABILITY EVER. AND THIS CARD HOSES IT.