Jund Pod Has The Runs 75 cards, 15 sideboard 3 {Mountain} 4 {Woodland Cemetery} 3 {Swamp} 9 {Forest} 2 {Kessig Wolf Run} 1 {Inkmoth Nexus} 3 {Rootbound Crag} 25 lands 2 {Llanowar Elves} 4 {Birds of Paradise} 4 {Viridian Emissary} 2 {Glissa, the Traitor} 1 {Phyrexian Rager} 1 {Pyreheart Wolf} 1 {Solemn Simulacrum} 1 {Phyrexian Metamorph} 1 {Falkenrath Aristocrat} 1 {Huntmaster of the Fells} 1 {Entomber Exarch} 1 {Urabrask the Hidden} 3 {Acidic Slime} 2 {Vorapede} 1 {Inferno Titan} 1 {Primeval Titan} 1 {Wurmcoil Engine} 1 {Sheoldred, Whispering One} 29 creatures 2 {Tragic Slip} 4 {Birthing Pod} 6 other spells Sideboard 2 {Crushing Vines} 2 {Skinrender} 2 {Asceticism} 1 {Surgical Extraction} 1 {Ancient Grudge} 1 {Acidic Slime} 1 {Thrun, the Last Troll} 2 {Nihil Spellbomb} 2 {Sever the Bloodline} 1 {Beast Within} 15 sideboard cards |
Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 07, 2012, 11:36:44 PMYour build or are you mocking me?
Ehh, closest one went 1-4
Quote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 12:23:22 AMI'm saying that a deck that is almost exactly like this, with the exception of a few DA stuff went 1-4 in my local FNM. I'm sorry if this is the truth, but this deck simply isn't that good.Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 07, 2012, 11:36:44 PMYour build or are you mocking me?
Ehh, closest one went 1-4
Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 08, 2012, 02:20:04 AMQuote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 12:23:22 AMI'm saying that a deck that is almost exactly like this, with the exception of a few DA stuff went 1-4 in my local FNM. I'm sorry if this is the truth, but this deck simply isn't that good.Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 07, 2012, 11:36:44 PMYour build or are you mocking me?
Ehh, closest one went 1-4
Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 08, 2012, 02:20:04 AMwell I'd say either that guy had crap hands or he wasn't a good player because this deck looks like a pretty solid pod deck.Quote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 12:23:22 AMI'm saying that a deck that is almost exactly like this, with the exception of a few DA stuff went 1-4 in my local FNM. I'm sorry if this is the truth, but this deck simply isn't that good.Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 07, 2012, 11:36:44 PMYour build or are you mocking me?
Ehh, closest one went 1-4
Quote from: Karrthus on February 08, 2012, 08:03:00 AMI'm sorry, bad people don't come to my fnm unless they want to be humiliated in front of everyone. Even if bad people come once in awhile, they become good fast. Pod decks don't exist anymore in the metagame, with all the artifact and creature destroys and aggro decks, it is nearly impossible to run a pod deck without being crushed on games 2 and 3. (as an obvious point, pod decks really don't work without pod or creatures.)Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 08, 2012, 02:20:04 AMwell I'd say either that guy had crap hands or he wasn't a good player because this deck looks like a pretty solid pod deck.Quote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 12:23:22 AMI'm saying that a deck that is almost exactly like this, with the exception of a few DA stuff went 1-4 in my local FNM. I'm sorry if this is the truth, but this deck simply isn't that good.Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 07, 2012, 11:36:44 PMYour build or are you mocking me?
Ehh, closest one went 1-4
Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 08, 2012, 08:35:56 PMQuote from: Karrthus on February 08, 2012, 08:03:00 AMI'm sorry, bad people don't come to my fnm unless they want to be humiliated in front of everyone. Even if bad people come once in awhile, they become good fast. Pod decks don't exist anymore in the metagame, with all the artifact and creature destroys and aggro decks, it is nearly impossible to run a pod deck without being crushed on games 2 and 3. (as an obvious point, pod decks really don't work without pod or creatures.)Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 08, 2012, 02:20:04 AMwell I'd say either that guy had crap hands or he wasn't a good player because this deck looks like a pretty solid pod deck.Quote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 12:23:22 AMI'm saying that a deck that is almost exactly like this, with the exception of a few DA stuff went 1-4 in my local FNM. I'm sorry if this is the truth, but this deck simply isn't that good.Quote from: Appleguru56 on February 07, 2012, 11:36:44 PMYour build or are you mocking me?
Ehh, closest one went 1-4
Quote from: Validan on February 08, 2012, 11:07:55 PM
Apple may be a bit forward with the way he comes off as a player and with his advice, but his advice hasn't been without the intent of helping people improve, which it has I believe.
I'm also going to agree with apple and prophylaxis on this one, not that you shouldn't play a pod deck I love the basis of them and would really like to play one, but with those cards alone there is easily a lot of hate to remove or stop a pod quite quickly. Maybe where you play though you are able to overcome it like you said which is excellent! But I believe for a majority of people it's not so easy to play a pod deck without some hate
Quote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 11:15:46 PMQuote from: Validan on February 08, 2012, 11:07:55 PM
Apple may be a bit forward with the way he comes off as a player and with his advice, but his advice hasn't been without the intent of helping people improve, which it has I believe.
I'm also going to agree with apple and prophylaxis on this one, not that you shouldn't play a pod deck I love the basis of them and would really like to play one, but with those cards alone there is easily a lot of hate to remove or stop a pod quite quickly. Maybe where you play though you are able to overcome it like you said which is excellent! But I believe for a majority of people it's not so easy to play a pod deck without some hate
That's true, there isn't a whole lot of hate against my deck where I play, considering a lot of people are playing esper colors and I am the only pod player.
Quote from: Prophylaxis on February 08, 2012, 11:24:18 PMQuote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 11:15:46 PMQuote from: Validan on February 08, 2012, 11:07:55 PM
Apple may be a bit forward with the way he comes off as a player and with his advice, but his advice hasn't been without the intent of helping people improve, which it has I believe.
I'm also going to agree with apple and prophylaxis on this one, not that you shouldn't play a pod deck I love the basis of them and would really like to play one, but with those cards alone there is easily a lot of hate to remove or stop a pod quite quickly. Maybe where you play though you are able to overcome it like you said which is excellent! But I believe for a majority of people it's not so easy to play a pod deck without some hate
That's true, there isn't a whole lot of hate against my deck where I play, considering a lot of people are playing esper colors and I am the only pod player.
I know. I used to run pod back in the day {Priest of Urabrask is sick tech}, but the hate just made me switch to Architect.
Quote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 11:36:43 PMQuote from: Prophylaxis on February 08, 2012, 11:24:18 PMQuote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 11:15:46 PMQuote from: Validan on February 08, 2012, 11:07:55 PM
Apple may be a bit forward with the way he comes off as a player and with his advice, but his advice hasn't been without the intent of helping people improve, which it has I believe.
I'm also going to agree with apple and prophylaxis on this one, not that you shouldn't play a pod deck I love the basis of them and would really like to play one, but with those cards alone there is easily a lot of hate to remove or stop a pod quite quickly. Maybe where you play though you are able to overcome it like you said which is excellent! But I believe for a majority of people it's not so easy to play a pod deck without some hate
That's true, there isn't a whole lot of hate against my deck where I play, considering a lot of people are playing esper colors and I am the only pod player.
I know. I used to run pod back in the day {Priest of Urabrask is sick tech}, but the hate just made me switch to Architect.
Not doubting you or anything but doesn't that also run high amounts of artifacts? Then again it's not like there is one central arti that the deck revolves around.
Quote from: Prophylaxis on February 08, 2012, 11:40:53 PMQuote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 11:36:43 PMQuote from: Prophylaxis on February 08, 2012, 11:24:18 PMQuote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 11:15:46 PMQuote from: Validan on February 08, 2012, 11:07:55 PM
Apple may be a bit forward with the way he comes off as a player and with his advice, but his advice hasn't been without the intent of helping people improve, which it has I believe.
I'm also going to agree with apple and prophylaxis on this one, not that you shouldn't play a pod deck I love the basis of them and would really like to play one, but with those cards alone there is easily a lot of hate to remove or stop a pod quite quickly. Maybe where you play though you are able to overcome it like you said which is excellent! But I believe for a majority of people it's not so easy to play a pod deck without some hate
That's true, there isn't a whole lot of hate against my deck where I play, considering a lot of people are playing esper colors and I am the only pod player.
I know. I used to run pod back in the day {Priest of Urabrask is sick tech}, but the hate just made me switch to Architect.
Not doubting you or anything but doesn't that also run high amounts of artifacts? Then again it's not like there is one central arti that the deck revolves around.
It has answers to the answers. {Wurmcoil Engine} and {Negate} are things that come to mind.
Have you considered running {Turn Aside}? It doesn't fit the color scheme of the deck but it might be helpful at protecting your 'pod.
Quote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 11:45:08 PMQuote from: Prophylaxis on February 08, 2012, 11:40:53 PMQuote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 11:36:43 PMQuote from: Prophylaxis on February 08, 2012, 11:24:18 PMQuote from: loop-s-pool on February 08, 2012, 11:15:46 PMQuote from: Validan on February 08, 2012, 11:07:55 PM
Apple may be a bit forward with the way he comes off as a player and with his advice, but his advice hasn't been without the intent of helping people improve, which it has I believe.
I'm also going to agree with apple and prophylaxis on this one, not that you shouldn't play a pod deck I love the basis of them and would really like to play one, but with those cards alone there is easily a lot of hate to remove or stop a pod quite quickly. Maybe where you play though you are able to overcome it like you said which is excellent! But I believe for a majority of people it's not so easy to play a pod deck without some hate
That's true, there isn't a whole lot of hate against my deck where I play, considering a lot of people are playing esper colors and I am the only pod player.
I know. I used to run pod back in the day {Priest of Urabrask is sick tech}, but the hate just made me switch to Architect.
Not doubting you or anything but doesn't that also run high amounts of artifacts? Then again it's not like there is one central arti that the deck revolves around.
It has answers to the answers. {Wurmcoil Engine} and {Negate} are things that come to mind.
Have you considered running {Turn Aside}? It doesn't fit the color scheme of the deck but it might be helpful at protecting your 'pod.
Don't take this the wrong way guys but I feel like a blind person with a bunch of people surrounding him asking him of he needs help. {Glissa, the Traitor} brings back pod if something is to happen to it. I'll have to see next FNM if I run into any {Grafdigger's Cages} but my an packs mega answers as well as my mainboard