Sparkle Ninja : trade thief AND liar

Well IMO since s/he chose to leave that name and address should be added to the untrustworthy trader list.

Well IMO since s/he chose to leave that name and address should be added to the untrustworthy trader list.

I second that

Well, she decided to clear out. Can't say that I disagree with her decision.

I can't disagree either, just wish this person would have messged me back. I believe I was pretty reasonable with communication. Not like I'm texting sparkle at 3AM

I had a completely fine trade with sparkle and I was completely satisfied

I never had any problems with her. Sad things happened the way they did.

That sounds like they didn't want to deal with this. Seems like an admission of guilt to me.

Didn't she have to sell some power to put a down payment on a house ?

Foil Aegis with an Athreos. Traded Athreos for a Platinum emperion and an overgrown tomb

Then Tasby is like uh,huh. This was back on May 19th

Quote from: Agrus Kos, Enforcer of Truth on April 26, 2014, 05:57:47 PM

The most expensive card I pulled at my first prerelease was Launch the Fleet... hopefully this one and the next one are better.

I ended up trading for three of these and four Athreos at the Prerealease. The aggro deck shall be mine!

Evidence #2

Ok. Money cards of awesome. I got two Batterskulls, Another Karn Liberated, A foil Vorinclax Voice of Hunger, and I also got the rest of the Praetors. I got two Spellskite, I got 1 Phyrexian Obliterator but I traded it for two Desecration Demon

Ok. Done with that,

Just put the ban out there. I'm tired of reading these bullhsit lies.

Found a classic

Quote from: Erik_the_gray on March 17, 2014, 11:07:19 AM

A lot of guys won't tell girls that they are pretty because they think tons of other guys already do, and they don't want you to see them as yet another one of "those guys". My wife majors in psychology if you would like someone to talk to, I'm sure she would listen.

I did too actually

Apparently, a major in psychology

@ stromack. I appreciate you bringing this stuff up but this is muggs trial. He put up some strong evidence, no need to just all pile on now. If s/he really bothered you that much feel free to open a new one.

Trust me I personally didn't trust this person from go, but some people did ( look at the karma). This will be dealt with.

@ stromack. I appreciate you bringing this stuff up but this is muggs trial. He put up some strong evidence, no need to just all pile on now. If s/he really bothered you that much feel free to open a new one.

Trust me I personally didn't trust this person from go, but some people did ( look at the karma). This will be dealt with.

Everything should be brought up now in this trial no sense having more than one trial

Quote from: Rass on June 13, 2014, 11:33:00 AM

@ stromack. I appreciate you bringing this stuff up but this is muggs trial. He put up some strong evidence, no need to just all pile on now. If s/he really bothered you that much feel free to open a new one.

Trust me I personally didn't trust this person from go, but some people did ( look at the karma). This will be dealt with.

Everything should be brought up now in this trial no sense having more than one trial

This was my point. No point in bringing up a second trial for lying, when it's in plain site for all to see.

Everything that anyone agrees that would fall under the "no lying" rule should be brought up.

Quote from: Mattao19 on June 13, 2014, 11:42:02 AM

Quote from: Rass on June 13, 2014, 11:33:00 AM

@ stromack. I appreciate you bringing this stuff up but this is muggs trial. He put up some strong evidence, no need to just all pile on now. If s/he really bothered you that much feel free to open a new one.

Trust me I personally didn't trust this person from go, but some people did ( look at the karma). This will be dealt with.

Everything should be brought up now in this trial no sense having more than one trial

This was my point. No point in bringing up a second trial for lying, when it's in plain site for all to see.

Everything that anyone agrees that would fall under the "no lying" rule should be brought up.

Exactly