Karma

[BlackJester]

I think it should be unmoderated, honest, and frequent.  The more people use it, I believe that the more people will use it genuinely, thus reducing the effects of the minority of trolls.  There are 10,000 people that said they didn't like "Somebody That I Used to Know" as performed by Walk Off The Earth on youtube.  (If you haven't seen it, watch the original vid by Goyte, which is genius, then watch theirs)

You can't even make out the sliver that represents of the over one million likes they got.  In large numbers, things work out.

[Kuberr]

Well, though I do support what you guys have to say in the end.... I believe some things can usually be fixed rather easily by simple compromise.

I trust your judgement, bj.

[BlackJester]

I don't think it's perfect and I do want to hear your ideas (although Piotr's the one running the show here). I'm just giving my opinion, as I am inclined to do. 😁

By-the-by, you shouldn't trust my judgment. You should question everything I do, call me out if you disagree, please.

[JaCe BeLeReN]

I don't think it's perfect and I do want to hear your ideas (although Piotr's the one running the show here). I'm just giving my opinion, as I am inclined to do. 😁

By-the-by, you shouldn't trust my judgment. You should question everything I do, call me out if you disagree, please.

I disagree and I think we should trust youur judgement, especially involving rules.

[Sagemaster]

Lol I can't believe I was naive enough to neglect the possibility of gfevjghgev haha

[Kuberr]

Lol I can't believe I was naive enough to neglect the possibility of gfevjghgev haha

I just lol'd.

[Mentonin]

It may be that someone gives a troll reason or silly reason, but then if you want to evaluate someone's trade trust or something like that, you could see the reasons, as if they were "reviews"

[BlackJester]

It may be that someone gives a troll reason or silly reason, but then if you want to evaluate someone's trade trust or something like that, you could see the reasons, as if they were "reviews"

I'm concerned that something like that would just be one more thing for us to have to moderate.  I don't like the idea of mining through pages of why one user gave another a +1 or -1.

[Mentonin]

I think only negative karma should have the reason. And there could be a "denounce negative karma with no reason" thing. Or better, a denounce player rating only for trades

[BlackJester]

I think the better idea was mentioned.  Separate trading points from karma.  Someone can be a douche on the forums but still be a good trader (although I would expect there to be some correlation between the two).  Someone can be helpful and fun on the forums, but lose cards, take too long yadda yadda in trading.

I've only traded a couple of times, but I wouldn't expect people to think I'm a good trader because of my posts.

[Greg54js]

Piotr,
I want to be able to give karma from my iPod. Please try to make this happen

Thanks

[GoJuDragon]

You already can bro

[GoJuDragon]

Go to help> desktop forum> click the link in BJs post> hit like on a post posted by whoever you want to give the karma to. Like is under their name, on the left hand side of the page

[Greg54js]

Go to help> desktop forum> click the link in BJs post> hit like on a post posted by whoever you want to give the karma to. Like is under their name, on the left hand side of the page

I mean like without opening up safari

[Piotr]

Current karma system is a temporary solution. The goal is to have 'personal ban system' where anyone can privately ban anyone else. For the old timers, this would be how we used to filter the trolls on the usenet, we would add them to a banned user lists directly in our readers.