SUPERBOWL 39!!

Started by Popper23345, February 01, 2015, 10:05:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

gtfotis

Hey, the Seahawks got paid well for that interception. Entertainment.

MuggyWuggy

Quote from: gtfotis on February 03, 2015, 12:15:08 AM
Hey, the Seahawks got paid well for that interception. Entertainment.

Pete Carroll's karma chased him after he beat the heat at USC

Wingnut

Quote from: gtfotis on February 03, 2015, 12:15:08 AM
Hey, the Seahawks got paid well for that interception. Entertainment.

It was a good game man, but not rigged. Simply an arguably bad play call and a situationally aware defender. It happens to every team. This on just happened to be huge.

InfinitiveDivinity

Quote from: Dstyle1 on February 02, 2015, 09:31:06 PM
For the record I heard that lynch was like  1/6 this year from punching it it this year.

Also the replay of Richard Sherman's face is priceless along with Brady's.
My brother had me dying! He says "He cries just like Brooklynn!". My niece makes a face that's almost identical to that 😄.

Rass

It's always a bad play call when it doesn't work.

DirtyMustachio

How bout the scumbag def line on the seahawks

Acting like a bunch of children (at the end of the game)

I'm from nc so I just wanted to see Wilson win.

Truely a nc state ending though...

Their motto is "we'll get em next year"


lotrwk

Quote from: Rass on February 03, 2015, 10:55:13 AM
It's always a bad play call when it doesn't work.
are you saying it wasn't a bad call? You have Lynch, the best running back in the game, in the backfield, ready to win the game. You also have Russel Wilson, the quarterback that's best at running the ball in the league, and you decide to run a slants play? A play that can end up in a turnover instead of something that'll 99% of the time work? Maybe it was a play just to waste time. If it was, why pass it to someone that's covered, and not an open space? It was a pretty brutal call, even if it had worked

Rass

Quote from: lotrwk on February 03, 2015, 08:57:18 PM
Quote from: Rass on February 03, 2015, 10:55:13 AM
It's always a bad play call when it doesn't work.
are you saying it wasn't a bad call? You have Lynch, the best running back in the game, in the backfield, ready to win the game. You also have Russel Wilson, the quarterback that's best at running the ball in the league, and you decide to run a slants play? A play that can end up in a turnover instead of something that'll 99% of the time work? Maybe it was a play just to waste time. If it was, why pass it to someone that's covered, and not an open space? It was a pretty brutal call, even if it had worked

Yep lynch is a guarantee score or 99% not really http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/wp/2015/02/02/seahawks-marshawn-lynch-isnt-exactly-money-from-the-1-yard-line/. Next they didn't even have their goal line big package out there. Look Wilson made a bad play what if he ran and fumbled it same .poo.. The cornerback made a great play maybe he would have done the same on the run. Look at the time left 50 seconds with one time out. It's not the play calling it was the execution Wilson could have tossed it away or ran he made a choice and the cornerback (who is also paid and a professional player) made a better play. If he would have tossed a td people would be talking how smart it was to call an unexpected pass play.

Pi

Quote from: Popper23345 on February 02, 2015, 03:54:33 PM
Quote from: Wingnut on February 02, 2015, 03:43:51 PM
Quote from: AstroGeek327 on February 02, 2015, 03:29:29 PM
Wasnt it 49?? Or am I this out of the loop?!

No, you're cool, it was 49. Let's be real, it was a tight game that could have gone the other way. The Pats were just paying attention at the exact moment they needed to be. Well played game by both teams.
Yeh, it was 49, I was just pretty excited :P
But yea, couldn't have said it better my self wingnut

XLIX = 49 L = 50 I wonder how next year's logo is going to look, with only a single L underneath?