Ferguson

Started by jonrox3, August 16, 2014, 01:02:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

MuggyWuggy

Then you have experts like this guy who think Michael brown had reefer madness....

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/dr-michael-baden-marijuana-michael-brown

Lets not pull wool over our eyes people..

Wingnut

Quote from: Muggywuggy on August 19, 2014, 10:17:24 AM
There were no other officers on the initial scene, so we can throw your first statement out

If there was an officer on the scene in addition to Wilson we would have much more info as of now

Ok, looking a little more, I'll concede to this. It said that the "police are reporting", I thought I remembered something saying that there were other officers there. But I'll concede that it's basically the one officer vs witnesses. I agree that this may in fact be a situation where an officer lost his cool, I just wish that there was actual evidence instead of statements. Gonna be interesting to see what comes out of this, no matter what the outcome, media has already prepped society to be angry if the officer WAS defending himself. Just wish that people would see this as an opportunity to unify the country on race instead of separating it more (or is that the plan?).

Kaworu, the Fifth Child

Quote from: #millsux! on August 19, 2014, 12:38:33 AM
Unless the guy is twice as big as you.
Well, it still oversteps the boundaries of self defense.

Wingnut

Quote from: #millsux! on August 19, 2014, 11:25:07 AM
Quote from: Muggywuggy on August 19, 2014, 10:52:02 AM
Then you have experts like this guy who think Michael brown had reefer madness....

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/dr-michael-baden-marijuana-michael-brown

Lets not pull wool over our eyes people..

He wasn't saying that he was crazy.  Just that he was high.  Different people react differently to drugs, so it's in the realm of possibility (I'm not for or against this view) that it contributed to his actions,

I personally say this "evidence" horse sheet and I hope they are not going to actually use this for evidence in the defense. If they base anything on this I am going to say they are grasping straws. Hopefully it's just a specialist saying this is a possibility.

MuggyWuggy

Quote from: Taysby on August 19, 2014, 11:26:22 AM
Quote from: Muggywuggy on August 19, 2014, 10:29:31 AM
A phone interview with the friend of his wife is the closest statement they have


http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/18/us/missouri-teen-shooting/index.html?c=&page=2

And still eyewitness accounts report brown running away from the officer.

All of these reports claiming Brown charged the officer seem far fetched. Would you charge at a cop with a gun?

How does one think they would get away with killing a police officer???! Why aren't these questions people ask themselves.

You could get away with it if you managed to grab his gun.

Taysby I hate to say it: but you're a ducking idiot.

You think someone can get away with killing a cop in broad daylight by shooting the officer with his own gun in front of a community.

Just read the scenario instead of having a quick reply of denial. You're awful at this.

MuggyWuggy

Quote from: Taysby on August 19, 2014, 11:25:07 AM
Quote from: Muggywuggy on August 19, 2014, 10:52:02 AM
Then you have experts like this guy who think Michael brown had reefer madness....

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/dr-michael-baden-marijuana-michael-brown

Lets not pull wool over our eyes people..

He wasn't saying that he was crazy.  Just that he was high.  Different people react differently to drugs, so it's in the realm of possibility (I'm not for or against this view) that it contributed to his actions,
D.A.R.E. to keep thinking like Reefer Madness

MuggyWuggy

Quote from: Wingnut on August 19, 2014, 11:31:11 AM
Quote from: #millsux! on August 19, 2014, 11:25:07 AM
Quote from: Muggywuggy on August 19, 2014, 10:52:02 AM
Then you have experts like this guy who think Michael brown had reefer madness....

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/dr-michael-baden-marijuana-michael-brown

Lets not pull wool over our eyes people..

He wasn't saying that he was crazy.  Just that he was high.  Different people react differently to drugs, so it's in the realm of possibility (I'm not for or against this view) that it contributed to his actions,

I personally say this "evidence" horse sheet and I hope they are not going to actually use this for evidence in the defense. If they base anything on this I am going to say they are grasping straws. Hopefully it's just a specialist saying this is a possibility.

He's a former medical examiner who appears to have been apart of the same era as reefer madness. This guy is retired and talking bull out of his mouth.

Toxicology reports MJ in his system??! Guess what: MJ stays active in your system up to 3 months if you smoke it regularly. Pretty sure he smoked it regularly considering the blunts he stole; which have nothing to do with this case at all, this about a cop killing an unarmed teen

MuggyWuggy

Quote from: Taysby on August 19, 2014, 01:03:02 PM
I believe all that it'll be is something to help strengthen the fact that he did in fact attack the officer.  Because right now it's mainly just a he said she said.

Eye Witness vs police statement through his wife's friend on a phone call a week after the incident. Lets be more specific here about he said she said.

MuggyWuggy

And still not ever one source from you

Wingnut


MuggyWuggy


MuggyWuggy


Wingnut

Quote from: Muggywuggy on August 19, 2014, 01:48:26 PM
Quote from: Wingnut on August 19, 2014, 11:31:11 AM
Quote from: #millsux! on August 19, 2014, 11:25:07 AM
Quote from: Muggywuggy on August 19, 2014, 10:52:02 AM
Then you have experts like this guy who think Michael brown had reefer madness....

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/dr-michael-baden-marijuana-michael-brown

Lets not pull wool over our eyes people..

He wasn't saying that he was crazy.  Just that he was high.  Different people react differently to drugs, so it's in the realm of possibility (I'm not for or against this view) that it contributed to his actions,

I personally say this "evidence" horse sheet and I hope they are not going to actually use this for evidence in the defense. If they base anything on this I am going to say they are grasping straws. Hopefully it's just a specialist saying this is a possibility.

He's a former medical examiner who appears to have been apart of the same era as reefer madness. This guy is retired and talking bull out of his mouth.

Toxicology reports MJ in his system??! Guess what: MJ stays active in your system up to 3 months if you smoke it regularly. Pretty sure he smoked it regularly considering the blunts he stole; which have nothing to do with this case at all, this about a cop killing an unarmed teen

Completely agree, this is why I hope this is not what they're basing their defense off, cause it sounds pretty far fetched and grasping for straws IMO.

MuggyWuggy

I feel like if this wasn't a bullshit shooting, we would have all the police evidence already. Rather than them clearly state what happened, I feel they are now just strategizing to keep the uproar to a minimum

MuggyWuggy

Quote from: Taysby on August 19, 2014, 02:29:57 PM
Quote from: Muggywuggy on August 19, 2014, 01:50:20 PM
And still not ever one source from you

What sources do I need?  I'm using logic!  Accuracy with handguns isn't that great.  Large people pose a threat. Etc.

Not being derogatory; just using metaphors

Look at your own post: "I don't need sources I use logic"

You're still not grasping that an unarmed person was killed by a trained officer of the law. You look at any other way to spin it.