Living End Budget

Started by Joshnoodles, November 13, 2013, 07:45:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Joshnoodles


Living End Budget

60 cards, 0 sideboard


5 {Swamp}
10 {Mountain}
7 {Forest}

22 lands


4 {Deadshot Minotaur}
4 {Monstrous Carabid}
4 {Street Wraith}
4 {Simian Spirit Guide}
3 {Valley Rannet}
3 {Igneous Pouncer}
3 {Ghor-Clan Rampager}
3 {Avalanche Riders}
1 {Jungle Weaver}

29 creatures


3 {Demonic Dread}
4 {Violent Outburst}
2 {Living End}

9 other spells


Sideboard

Notes:
For a budget version this deck still runs really well. I have no problem with land and I rarely have to mulligan.

Vileo

#1
Needs more {Pale Recluse}. I'd take out Ghor Clan for three of those.
Also less Pouncer. Add +1 Living End, +1 Demonic Dread, and +1 Jungle Weaver.
If you can afford them, 4x {Forbidden Orchard} or 1x {Dryad Arbor} to turn on Dread

Vileo

Quote from: Potticus on November 14, 2013, 02:25:52 PM
Quote from: Vileo on November 13, 2013, 01:15:21 PM
Needs more {Pale Recluse}. I'd take out Ghor Clan for three of those.
Also less Pouncer. Add +1 Living End, +1 Demonic Dread, and +1 Jungle Weaver.
If you can afford them, 4x {Forbidden Orchard} or 1x {Dryad Arbor} to turn on Dread

You don't run 4 demonic dread, you draw too many living end cascading cards as it is.
I've seen different lists running both configurations. It's a preference thing.

Joshnoodles

I'm not to fond of pale recluse just cause it doesn't do enough for me where as pouncer has haste and cycles for 2 types of mana I run. Also I'm thinking about cutting ghost clan cause he's a little slow but I don't know what to add in other than pale recluse and another living end. Any suggestions.

Vileo

The thing abou pale recluse is its a 4/5. With reach. So if you have to cascade on your turn you don't just die to fliers. And Pouncer has one toughness.