{Master Warcraft}

Started by Raven316, March 15, 2012, 08:20:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Raven316

I am not sure I understand this card completely even though it seem to be straight forward. Ok let say an opponent declares an attack I then cast {Master Warcraft} does that mean I take over his attack phase and have the choice not to attack myself or attack with no creatures is this correct?

BlackJester

Quote from: Raven316 on March 15, 2012, 08:20:54 PM
I annoy sure I understand this card completely even though it seem to be straight forward. Ok let say an opponent declares an attack I then cast {Master Warcraft} does that mean I take over his attack phase and have the choice not to attack myself or attack with no creatures is this correct?
Yup.

ChrisRodriguez

Yes you control the attack phase. You can declare no attacking creatures or any number you chose.

Raven316

This card is crazy amazing wow... Thanks guys for the quick response

Raven316

Can you also force an attack phase?

Tetsomori

U can as long as u play it before their declare attackers step

BlackJester

Combat Phase with ALWAYS happen, even if there are no creatures.  Now, if you cast it anytime before the Declare Attackers Step (which you have to) then you decide which creatures attack and block, regardless of whose turn it is.  You can decide zero creatures for either if you want.

Raven316

Ok thanks... This card is AMAZING wow I can't believe I never saw it before

Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker

Can Warcraft allow creatures to go unblocked? Even if they could be?

BlackJester

Quote from: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker on March 16, 2012, 04:21:46 PM
Can Warcraft allow creatures to go unblocked? Even if they could be?

You can do whatever you want, you're the master, provided you follow all restrictions. You can't use it to have a {Lure}d attack unblocked. All choices must still be legal, other than that you're tha boss!

Raven316

I don't understand the third ruling of the card

#noided

Quote from: Raven316 on March 16, 2012, 04:56:15 PM
I don't understand the third ruling of the card

If you're refering to {Lure}'s 3rd ruling, it just means that having Lure on a creature does not allow a creature who can't block (e.g. {Bloodghast}) to block.

BlackJester

You only get to decide which creatures attack and block.  The attacking player still decides whether attacking creatures are attacking the player or any planewalkers that player controls.

Raven316

Quote from: BlackJester on March 16, 2012, 05:09:29 PM
You only get to decide which creatures attack and block.  The attacking player still decides whether attacking creatures are attacking the player or any planewalkers that player controls.
which means the active player can nullify your attack sequence? Or are u referring to a case if there is a planeswalker involved only?

BlackJester

Quote from: Raven316 on March 16, 2012, 06:03:29 PM
Quote from: BlackJester on March 16, 2012, 05:09:29 PM
You only get to decide which creatures attack and block.  The attacking player still decides whether attacking creatures are attacking the player or any planewalkers that player controls.
which means the active player can nullify your attack sequence? Or are u referring to a case if there is a planeswalker involved only?

Only if a planewalker is there.  You can't have creatures attack a non-existent planeswalker.