Overlapping evergreen mechanic for red/blue

[Mizark]

I would say that {U}{B} has Unblockable

thats not a mechanic anymore

I know but it still kinda feels like it
"[CARD NAME] is Unblockable", they could simply write "Unblockable" and voila !!

[Spikepit]

I would say that {U}{B} has Unblockable

thats not a mechanic anymore

I know but it still kinda feels like it
"[CARD NAME] is Unblockable", they could simply write "Unblockable" and voila !!

Then in that case, it would have be the same with "[CARDNAME] is indestructible", in which case it would then need to be change to Indestructibility for grammar purposes. Big changes.


Edit: meanwhile, I am actually intrigued in the more serious angle of this thread (but still feel for the blue creature's TP-ed house).

[Mizark]

I would say that {U}{B} has Unblockable

thats not a mechanic anymore

I know but it still kinda feels like it
"[CARD NAME] is Unblockable", they could simply write "Unblockable" and voila !!

Then in that case, it would have be the same with "[CARDNAME] is indestructible", in which case it would then need to be change to Indestructibility for grammar purposes. Big changes.


Edit: meanwhile, I am actually intrigued in the more serious angle of this thread (but still feel for the blue creature's TP-ed house).

Well, why not ?!
We have an enchantment called {Lifelink} that gives Lifelink and we have an enchantment called {Indestructibility}, that could give, "Indestructibility" 😜