Naya Humans

Started by DJC-2009, August 16, 2012, 01:52:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

DJC-2009


Naya Humans

75 cards, 15 sideboard


1 {Gavony Township}
1 {Kessig Wolf Run}
2 {Mountain}
3 {Forest}
4 {Plains}
4 {Rootbound Crag}
4 {Sunpetal Grove}
4 {Razorverge Thicket}

23 lands


4 {Birds of Paradise}
4 {Avacyn's Pilgrim}
4 {Champion of the Parish}
2 {Nearheath Pilgrim}
4 {Champion of Lambholt}
3 {Silverblade Paladin}
2 {Blade Splicer}
4 {Goldnight Commander}
2 {Huntmaster of the Fells}
1 {Sublime Archangel}
1 {Zealous Conscripts}
1 {Sun Titan}
1 {Captain of the Watch}

33 creatures


4 {Thatcher Revolt}

4 other spells


Sideboard

2 {Tormod's Crypt}
1 {Sword of Feast and Famine}
1 {Sword of War and Peace}
1 {Daybreak Ranger}
2 {Elite Inquisitor}
2 {Oblivion Ring}
2 {Day of Judgment}
2 {Acidic Slime}
1 {Thragtusk}
1 {Silklash Spider}

15 sideboard cards



Notes:


DJC-2009

Just threw naya humans togather opinions and suggestions are much appritiated..

Hunteroffire9

You need to run 4 ofs to be more consistent and you need champion Of the  parish , Thalia, silverblade paladin,

DJC-2009

Quote from: DJC-2009 on August 16, 2012, 01:52:52 PM

Naya Humans

75 cards, 15 sideboard


1 {Gavony Township}
1 {Kessig Wolf Run}
2 {Mountain}
3 {Forest}
4 {Plains}
4 {Rootbound Crag}
4 {Sunpetal Grove}
4 {Razorverge Thicket}

23 lands


4 {Birds of Paradise}
4 {Avacyn's Pilgrim}
4 {Champion of the Parish}
2 {Nearheath Pilgrim}
4 {Champion of Lambholt}
3 {Silverblade Paladin}
2 {Blade Splicer}
4 {Goldnight Commander}
2 {Huntmaster of the Fells}
1 {Sublime Archangel}
1 {Zealous Conscripts}
1 {Sun Titan}
1 {Captain of the Watch}

33 creatures


4 {Thatcher Revolt}

4 other spells


Sideboard

2 {Tormod's Crypt}
1 {Sword of Feast and Famine}
1 {Sword of War and Peace}
1 {Daybreak Ranger}
2 {Elite Inquisitor}
2 {Oblivion Ring}
2 {Day of Judgment}
2 {Acidic Slime}
1 {Thragtusk}
1 {Silklash Spider}

15 sideboard cards



Notes:

Changed it up a little still could be better please give feedback on what you all think could make it better. Thanks

Coffee Vampire

#4
I think that you should be cautious of 4-ofs. It may be a good idea to consider a 3-of a playset. Then if you find a card or multiple cards that are the backbone of your deck, or that you always want in your opening hand, make them a 4-of.

I just finished a mono black control deck. At the start, it was just a bunch of 4-ofs. Now there is only one playset in the deck, and it works like a charm (most of the time ;))

Don't get me wrong, you should strive to be consistent. But if every good card in your deck is a 4-of, it will be consistently bad.

Btw, I am not saying you are making this mistake in your deck here. From what I see it looks pretty good. Just giving my warning against rashly adding playsets into decks. :)

DJC-2009

Quote from: Coffee Vampire on August 17, 2012, 12:56:16 AM
I think that you should be cautious of 4-ofs. It may be a good idea to consider a 3-of a playset. Then if you find a card or multiple cards that are the backbone of your deck, or that you always want in your opening hand, make them a 4-of.

I just finished a mono black control deck. At the start, it was just a bunch of 4-ofs. Now there is only one playset in the deck, and it works like a charm (most of the time ;))

Don't get me wrong, you should strive to be consistent. But if every good card in your deck is a 4-of, it will be consistently bad.

Btw, I am not saying you are making this mistake in your deck here. From what I see it looks pretty good. Just giving my warning against rashly adding playsets into decks. :)
Thank alot for your input but I don't have a really big collection to work with I am gonna work on this to make it better that is why I put it on here to see if anyone could help me make it better...

DJC-2009


Cllzzrd

To me it seems like {sublime archangel} goes against the theme of the deck. That being said, I have no clue about what you would put in its place.

Also, could you post the average mana cost? I think you should be aiming towards somewhere between 2.5-3.