Land Assault

[Dstyle1]

Grunt doesn't seem to be what you want? Grunt I'd anti grave yard tech. You want lands in your graveyard.

[cltrn81]

Grunt doesn't seem to be what you want? Grunt I'd anti grave yard tech. You want lands in your graveyard.

Ahh but grunt empties opponents GY too.  Helpful to recycle lands for the land tax if needed.  The knight is the only guy who benefits from land in my GY so I figure it is a risk I will take.

[Dstyle1]

I was thinking about to make c.crusher huge maybe. Feels risky tho. No offense to grunt, I run 3, but just feels like you want a big knight and this takes it away. Gl in the tourney btw

[cltrn81]

I was thinking about to make c.crusher huge maybe. Feels risky tho. No offense to grunt, I run 3, but just feels like you want a big knight and this takes it away. Gl in the tourney btw

Yea a smaller knight is a risk I am willing to take.  Thx and GL to you too.

[BlackJester]

Thanks for the suggestions guys.  This is one of those odd decks that do not need fetch lands cuz of land tax and wasteland is counterproductive to the gameplan.  You have to see it play to understand why.

Fetch lands not for mana fixing in this case, but to stock your gy with more land, buffing your KotR.  What about bounce-lands for Seismic assault?  Keeps your onboard land count low for landtaxing too.

[cltrn81]

Maybe I will put 1 of each fetch land and take out 1 of each dual.  I think bounce lands are too slow for legacy and they would be a great {wasteland} target.  I need all the basics in here for land tax so that count cannot change.  2 land tax means I am fetching 6 basics a turn.