Carnival Of Blood

[Goblinking]

Carnival Of Blood 60 cards, 0 sideboard 12 {Swamp} 12 {Mountain} 24 lands 2 {Vampire Interloper} 2 {Bloodlord of Vaasgoth} 3 {Blood Seeker} 2 {Rakish Heir} 2 {Falkenrath Marauders} 2 {Stromkirk Patrol} 2 {Crossway Vampire} 2 {Markov Patrician} 1 {Sengir Vampire} 1 {Bloodline Keeper} 2 {Falkenrath Noble} 1 {Night Revelers} 1 {Child of Night} 23 creatures 4 {Doom Blade} 1 {Traitorous Blood} 1 {Vampiric Fury} 1 {Night Terrors} 2 {Mask of Avacyn} 1 {Gruesome Deformity} 1 {Tectonic Rift} 1 {Tribute to Hunger} 1 {Traveler's Amulet} 13 other spells Sideboard Notes:

[Goblinking]

My fnm deck

[Thattallguy]

How consistent is it?

[Goblinking]

Extreaily they gain counters fast and hit hard

[Thattallguy]

Nice I think I might try this if ya don't mind.

[Goblinking]

I don't mind just watch for clumping as that happens it runs great even with small clumping

[Appleguru56]

How consistent is it?

Idk where you people attend your local fnm, but here where I reside, this deck will go 0-5 if lucky. (not to be harsh) but this deck runs on small and fragile creatures. I can't say it any other way, these creatures will simply be outclassed past turn 2

[BlackJester]

Idk where you people attend your local fnm, but here where I reside, this deck will go 0-5 if lucky. (not to be harsh) but this deck runs on small and fragile creatures. I can't say it any other way, these creatures will simply be outclassed past turn 2

You must have a pretty good environment/meta. Any suggestions for "classier" creatures?

[Appleguru56]

Idk where you people attend your local fnm, but here where I reside, this deck will go 0-5 if lucky. (not to be harsh) but this deck runs on small and fragile creatures. I can't say it any other way, these creatures will simply be outclassed past turn 2

You must have a pretty good environment/meta. Any suggestions for "classier" creatures?

3 {bloodlord of vaasgoth}
3 {bloodline keeper}
2 {Olivia voldaren}
4 {stormkirk noble}
3 {rakish heir}
3 {stormblood berserker}

3 {doomblade}
1 {dismember}
4 {curse of stalked prey}
2 {brimstone volley}
2 {slagstorm}
3 {geistflame}

1 {sorin markov}

4 {blackcleve cliffs}
4 {dragonskull summit}
2 {stensia bloodhall}
2 {ghost quarters}
7 {swamp}
7 {mountain}

[BlackJester]

Well, ask for some cards, get a whole deck!

Is this more control based strategy?

[Appleguru56]

Well, ask for some cards, get a whole deck!

Is this more control based strategy?

This deck is base on solidity. I'm not trying to build the next format defining deck so I didn't alter the theme much. This deck is built to survive the toughest things that the current metagame can throw. It could be called a control deck, but that would be a lie. An aggro deck, but that would be lies too.

[Goblinking]

Um not fragile the all gain counters and get bigger play test a deck before u say stuff

[NonTimeboMala]

I've played it. It runs pretty great. Nothing against my green elf deck big creature deck. 10 minutes ago he went -64,430 XD

[Prophylaxis]

How consistent is it?

Idk where you people attend your local fnm, but here where I reside, this deck will go 0-5 if lucky. (not to be harsh) but this deck runs on small and fragile creatures. I can't say it any other way, these creatures will simply be outclassed past turn 2

QFT, sadly. I would work out a much more leaner vampires build, something like

4 {Stromkirk Noble}
4 {Vampire Interloper}
4 {Rakish Heir}
2 {Olivia Voldaren}

Maybe some burn, but that's about it for the crux of the deck.

[Appleguru56]

Um not fragile the all gain counters and get bigger play test a deck before u say stuff

Oh, your definition of good isn't the same as mine.