Black Discard

Started by Mabb78, September 04, 2016, 03:37:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mabb78


Black Discard

60 cards, 0 sideboard


14 {Swamp}
4 {Leechridden Swamp}

18 lands


3 {Master of the Feast}
3 {Black Cat}
3 {Noxious Toad}

9 creatures


4 {Waste Not}
2 {Geth's Grimoire}
4 {Mutilate}
3 {Words of Waste}
2 {Quest for the Nihil Stone}
2 {Megrim}
4 {Cry of Contrition}
4 {Liliana's Caress}
2 {Scepter of Fugue}
4 {Funeral Charm}
2 {Shrieking Affliction}

33 other spells


Sideboard

Notes:
First off, your opinions/suggestions are always welcome. Second, I'm missing a couple pieces to having this put together. So, if anyone has something let me know cuz I'm always up for a trade.

redwolv


Mabb78

#2
Of corse! Holy crap! I thought I had it in there. It's in the actual physical deck now. Lol I have a play set. Because if you're gunna have some discard, why not have some fun with it. 😃👍

Added {waste not}.

ELLERfeller

Why not a  {Inquisition of Kozilek} or  {Thoughtseize} to maximize waste not?

Mabb78

Well, along with a couple other discard cards I'm runnin a couple {mind twists} which I think work fine. I don't have the {scepter of fugue} {cry of contritions}, {words of wastes} or the {noxious toads}.

Codester1991

{dark deal} seems good with waste not.

Mabb78

I like that. I was runnin into the problem of ppl gettin rid of the quests and afflictions and then just top decking. That's why I put in {master of the feasts}. Needed more discard ammo.

adventus

{hymn of tourach}
{hypnotic specter}

Mabb78

Quote from: adventus on September 05, 2016, 05:08:59 AM
{hymn of tourach}
{hypnotic specter}
The physical deck has some hymns. I thought about the specters but wanted to be more reactive/defensive than offensive.

i.lopezalzamora


Mabb78

Quote from: i.lopezalzamora on September 13, 2016, 09:03:39 AM
{The Rack}
That fits the idea and isn't an enchantment so I may actually replace the {shrieking afflictions} with that.

Spencer Addington

Quote from: Mabb78 on September 14, 2016, 03:26:33 AM
Quote from: i.lopezalzamora on September 13, 2016, 09:03:39 AM
{The Rack}
That fits the idea and isn't an enchantment so I may actually replace the {shrieking afflictions} with that.
If nothing you should replace Lilliana's caress. Caress does nothing once their hand is empty. Late game they will be top decking and playing everything they draw. It's better to keep their hand empty and have them dealt damage because of it.

Thefluffymacheen

Quote from: Spencer Addington on September 19, 2016, 05:25:07 PM
Quote from: Mabb78 on September 14, 2016, 03:26:33 AM
Quote from: i.lopezalzamora on September 13, 2016, 09:03:39 AM
{The Rack}
That fits the idea and isn't an enchantment so I may actually replace the {shrieking afflictions} with that.
If nothing you should replace Lilliana's caress. Caress does nothing once their hand is empty. Late game they will be top decking and playing everything they draw. It's better to keep their hand empty and have them dealt damage because of it.
That's what  {Master of the Feast} is for, guarantees opponents have a card to discard on your turn

LinkCelestrial

Quote from: Thefluffymacheen on September 19, 2016, 10:11:30 PM
Quote from: Spencer Addington on September 19, 2016, 05:25:07 PM
Quote from: Mabb78 on September 14, 2016, 03:26:33 AM
Quote from: i.lopezalzamora on September 13, 2016, 09:03:39 AM
{The Rack}
That fits the idea and isn't an enchantment so I may actually replace the {shrieking afflictions} with that.
If nothing you should replace Lilliana's caress. Caress does nothing once their hand is empty. Late game they will be top decking and playing everything they draw. It's better to keep their hand empty and have them dealt damage because of it.
That's what  {Master of the Feast} is for, guarantees opponents have a card to discard on your turn

He doesn't stick very often to fulfil that dream.

If he does you win by 5/5 flying beat down, plus that though.

Thefluffymacheen

Quote from: LinkCelestrial on September 20, 2016, 12:51:21 AM
Quote from: Thefluffymacheen on September 19, 2016, 10:11:30 PM
Quote from: Spencer Addington on September 19, 2016, 05:25:07 PM
Quote from: Mabb78 on September 14, 2016, 03:26:33 AM
Quote from: i.lopezalzamora on September 13, 2016, 09:03:39 AM
{The Rack}
That fits the idea and isn't an enchantment so I may actually replace the {shrieking afflictions} with that.
If nothing you should replace Lilliana's caress. Caress does nothing once their hand is empty. Late game they will be top decking and playing everything they draw. It's better to keep their hand empty and have them dealt damage because of it.
That's what  {Master of the Feast} is for, guarantees opponents have a card to discard on your turn

He doesn't stick very often to fulfil that dream.

If he does you win by 5/5 flying beat down, plus that though.
Fair point, I guess I'm thinking in the mind of my own playgroup. They don't play a ton of removal (cause most of us are budget players or just don't play black / red) and we also usually play large multiplayer games of 5+ people.