Awe strike and deflecting palm

Started by Co2, July 04, 2016, 10:09:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

particle

Quote from: Kaylesh on July 09, 2016, 07:43:10 AM
Yeah, interaction of replacement effects is pretty complex, as it works quite different from triggered effects on the stack.

Can't reproduce an example for a controller-less object in this instance. In the case of damage, the source pretty much always has one.

Plenty of times. An object only has a controller when it is on the stack or in play. In any other zone, an object has no controller, only an owner.

So if, for example, two replacement effects were trying to get you to discard a card for different reasons, then the owner of that card (i.e. you) makes the decision. The card in your hand has no controller.


^^ from a mtg salvation ruling discussing 419.9a

Piotr

Quote from: particle on July 09, 2016, 09:09:30 AM
from a mtg salvation ruling discussing 419.9a

Feel free to link to their site, they helped us a great deal in the past on many occasions and I do not mind advertising them outside Free Trade.

Co2

Quote from: particle on July 09, 2016, 09:09:30 AM
Quote from: Kaylesh on July 09, 2016, 07:43:10 AM
Yeah, interaction of replacement effects is pretty complex, as it works quite different from triggered effects on the stack.

Can't reproduce an example for a controller-less object in this instance. In the case of damage, the source pretty much always has one.

Plenty of times. An object only has a controller when it is on the stack or in play. In any other zone, an object has no controller, only an owner.

So if, for example, two replacement effects were trying to get you to discard a card for different reasons, then the owner of that card (i.e. you) makes the decision. The card in your hand has no controller.


^^ from a mtg salvation ruling discussing 419.9a

Thanks :) learned again today. Working my way to the 100post to give karma to everyone !