#MTGFinance

Started by MuggyWuggy, May 30, 2015, 07:02:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MuggyWuggy

#MTGFinance

You've probably seen this if you peruse a few different forums and info sites regarding magic.

Since the topic of reselling after buying out has come up in the price thread: how do you feel about the mtg stock game? Have you participated in speccing? Do you feel it is unfair to buyout and manipulate the price of a commonly used card? Have you profited from speccing? If so how much? How much have you lost?

If you're not into it yet, would you?

Nymuera

I have dipped my toe in. Bought 50 copies of Mastery of the unseen at $.33 each. Then started selling them when they hit $4. I'm going to keep at it though. Might keep to 20-24 copies per speculation though. 50 was too much to try to move without going buylist.

MuggyWuggy

But what you're talking about is related to speccing I feel, you're buying x (usually as many as one can afford) in order to resell on hype train, even better when you control the hype train price

Avodroc13

So it's like stocks, but for magic cards?

griffin131

Quote from: Taysby on May 30, 2015, 07:47:54 PM
Speccing is fine. When a company/individual exhibits monopolistic tendencies by buying out and being the only seller, I don't like that. I believe it's unethical.
What's the difference between buying out, say, tcgplayer and scg and then hoarding, and buying everything out locally and doing the same thing.

MuggyWuggy

I bought out all the sygg river foils at $5-$7 each foil (15 total available)

Someone relisted a foil at 25.99

Someone bought that out and relisted at $55

It has settled at $30 avg + shipping for NM foil.

Keep in mind I never set these prices, thankfully other sellers did it for me.

Am I unethical? I did buyout the complete inventory available online, but I didn't make the new price.

MuggyWuggy

Being able to manipulate the market because you paid attention to supply and demand isn't unethical, it's just apart of business.

You undercutting local competitors for your iPad repair service seems more unethical but to say that is to be a terrible business model for growth "oh I shouldn't profit"

Munchlax

I remember trading for like 30 or forty {hero of Iroas} when they hit like 50 cents or a dollar and then selling them when they went back up

Kaylesh

Well, when abusing a monopoly position and inflating actual worth of the card, that's gonna create a bubble. In the long term, these bubbles will burst.
We as community could act against this sort of behavior by keeping in mind what a card would be worth to us.
As long as people will buy at these inflated prices, the price will stay high.
Then again, if people are willing to pay, and there is demand at the inflated prices, economically it is viable.
Personally I'd think that wizards could actively discourage this sort of aftermarket hogging by reprinting without considering said aftermarket.

MuggyWuggy

I feel people upset about bubbles more so have a thought of "wish I grabbed those and paid attention to what is limited in supply enough to be bought out for format staples"


LinkCelestrial

I have profited by speculating and picking up cards like {Mana Conflunce} and {Goblin Rabble Master} then unloading when they were high. I have no problems with speculating. I don't like the idea of buying something out then jacking the price. I agree that it's unethical, but in buisness the line between legal and illegal is the one that counts. As mentioned you could get nailed for tax evasion if you don't claim it.

My bottom line is, I have no problem with buying and selling cards for profit, I do have a problem with buying cards in order to raise the price however I understand that it's viable.

MuggyWuggy

If supply is limited and demand is high: isn't it natural for price to increase?

MuggyWuggy

Lets remember serum visions is a $9 common - A $9 common - can't everyone just keep it at $3? Demand

LinkCelestrial

Yes but the supply isn't being manipulated to inflate the price.

Rass

Quote from: LinkCelestrial on May 31, 2015, 05:33:37 PM
Yes but the supply isn't being manipulated to inflate the price.


Can you prove this either way?