Deck With A Fancy Name

[Mattacheu]

Deck With A Fancy Name 60 cards, 0 sideboard 2 {Forest} 2 {Island} 4 {Stomping Ground} 2 {Mountain} 4 {Steam Vents} 4 {Breeding Pool} 4 {Hinterland Harbor} 22 lands 1 {Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre} 2 {Hydra Omnivore} 2 {Primordial Hydra} 2 {Chasm Skulker} 2 {Niv-Mizzet, Dracogenius} 3 {Prophet of Kruphix} 1 {Savageborn Hydra} 1 {Emrakul, the Aeons Torn} 3 {Horizon Chimera} 2 {Prime Speaker Zegana} 19 creatures 2 {Fling} 2 {Exploration} 2 {Through the Breach} 2 {Cyclonic Rift} 2 {Browbeat} 3 {Increasing Savagery} 4 {Rhystic Study} 2 {Curiosity} 19 other spells Sideboard Notes: Threw red in because cheap Emrakul combo, and draw shenanigans. Thoughts?

[Natxoblogg]

This deck contain one problem  {Blood Moon}.
{Destructive Revelry},  {Back to Nature},  {Naturalize} Is a good option for you sideboard.

[Ekann1]

More lands are needed. Many more lands.

[Mattacheu]

Doing test plays using the app, I found that with the four {rhystic study's} I have in there, I'm drawing into a lot of stuff, lands included. And only one person in my play group has land affecting cards, and {bad moon} isent one of them. Mostly {liquid metal coating} and artifact destroy. Took out a couple cards in which I didn't really want to play them when I had them.

[Natxoblogg]

More lands are needed. Many more lands.

22 lands is a good number, the curve of mana is compensated.

I think that a good sideboard is necesary for thus deck. The deck needs destroy enchanments, artifacs. Relative to creatures, the power of your creatures is enought