Cascadence

[Roberto982]

Cascadence 60 cards, 0 sideboard 4 {Archaeological Dig} 4 {Crystal Vein} 4 {Sulfur Vent} 4 {Irrigation Ditch} 4 {Ancient Spring} 2 {Ebon Stronghold} 4 {Geothermal Crevice} 4 {Tinder Farm} 30 lands 4 {Bloodbraid Elf} 4 {Enlisted Wurm} 4 {Nihilith} 2 {Kathari Remnant} 14 creatures 4 {Deny Reality} 4 {Restore Balance} 2 {Captured Sunlight} 3 {Violent Outburst} 3 {Ardent Plea} 16 other spells Sideboard

[Munchlax]

Is this deck real

[Munchlax]

Also play {amulet of Vigor}

[Dstyle1]

You guys said the same thing about leylines

[NovusOrbis]

I guess it could work. Cascade once and you theoretically have a board full of creatures.

[Munchlax]

You guys said the same thing about leylines

But Leylines is a deck that is proven to win. This is based off of a casual combo article written like 8 or 9 years ago

[Roberto982]

Yes its based off an old article, and it uses tap lands. But they're sort of essential for clearing my opponents lands with restore balance. This is my first foray into legacy, and at $20 for the deck, its not going to win every game. But any constructive advice is most welcome

[Munchlax]

You guys said the same thing about leylines

But Leylines is a deck that is proven to win. This is based off of a casual combo article written like 8 or 9 years ago

I think you have a very strange definition of proven to win...
On topic, this deck is slow and just bad. You hve little control off of what comes off of any given chain of cascades, and your essentially banking on your opponent having no meaningful interaction.

By proven to win I mean I've seen it do amazingly on many occasions.