The Gathering Forum-Rakdos

[Mattao19]

Ok so stoke has been fantastic

Ok just a thought bc it's not as abusable as it is with say Rabbles but good that it's working I just felt that for 4 mana a hard kill all spell is better

[lotrwk]

Flamespeaker and Cerberus seem very bad. Stormbreath and rabble seem to be much better suited at those mana costs.

[DylanW18]

Flamespeaker and Cerberus seem very bad. Stormbreath and rabble seem to be much better suited at those mana costs.

Agreed on this

[DrainCleaner]

Flamespeaker and Cerberus seem very bad. Stormbreath and rabble seem to be much better suited at those mana costs.

Play the deck and then tell me if flamespeaker is bad lol

[Mattao19]

I feel like Cerebus is bad personally

[Rass]

I feel like Cerebus is bad personally

I agree with this. If your playing an agro low cost creature deck he can backfire on you. Especially since you are low creature deck.

[DrainCleaner]

I feel like Cerebus is bad personally

I agree with this. If your playing an agro low cost creature deck he can backfire on you. Especially since you are low creature deck.

Lol stormbreath pobably is better

[lotrwk]

Flamespeaker and Cerberus seem very bad. Stormbreath and rabble seem to be much better suited at those mana costs.

Play the deck and then tell me if flamespeaker is bad lol

Flamespeaker is bad

[DrainCleaner]

Flamespeaker and Cerberus seem very bad. Stormbreath and rabble seem to be much better suited at those mana costs.

Play the deck and then tell me if flamespeaker is bad lol

Flamespeaker is bad

False

[lotrwk]

Flamespeaker and Cerberus seem very bad. Stormbreath and rabble seem to be much better suited at those mana costs.

Play the deck and then tell me if flamespeaker is bad lol

Flamespeaker is bad

False

True... He almost never gets through, and when he does, hits hits the spells to get rid of their non-existent blockers with your mass of removal.

[DrainCleaner]

Flamespeaker and Cerberus seem very bad. Stormbreath and rabble seem to be much better suited at those mana costs.

Play the deck and then tell me if flamespeaker is bad lol

Flamespeaker is bad

False

True... He almost never gets through, and when he does, hits hits the spells to get rid of their non-existent blockers with your mass of removal.

Think outside the box. It functions similar to a red courser.

[lotrwk]

In what way? It doesn't have as big of a butt, it's ability is only good when attacking, he doesn't gain you life, doesn't filter through your deck, and wastes cards if you don't have the mana to pay for them. In no way is it as good as a rabble would be. Rabble creates pressure, makes stoke easier, pushes damage through, doesn't have to be attacking to be fine, and two rabbles are much better than two flamespeakers.

[Mattao19]

In what way? It doesn't have as big of a butt, it's ability is only good when attacking, he doesn't gain you life, doesn't filter through your deck, and wastes cards if you don't have the mana to pay for them. In no way is it as good as a rabble would be. Rabble creates pressure, makes stoke easier, pushes damage through, doesn't have to be attacking to be fine, and two rabbles are much better than two flamespeakers.

I completely agree