Missing temples?!

Started by MisterJH, March 06, 2014, 01:10:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MisterJH

Why are there only 8 temples? Like why no izzet temple? Im confused :( and very sad

Also no golgari temple?

rarehuntertay

Next set they will be there

MisterJH

#2
Whats the logic to putting 4-4-2... What artard is getting paid money to decide thats a better idea than 5-5? Like seriously what jackarse just decides to give every guild goodies except those 2? Theres just no damn logic behind it, and i am a real proponent of logic... Clearly someone high up in the mtg game is a total dillweed who makes decisions for .poops. and giggles.

Johng4490

Please watch your language. Thank you!

MisterJH

I thought it autocensored D: it seems like it still does or did someone do that?

Johng4490

Maybe the plurality threw it off? I got your back. 👍

MisterJH

Regardless i wouldve refrained or toned down if id have known the autocensor doesnt like me :(

Johng4490

Could have sworn we had a PG-9 rule or something of the similar, but now I've gone through I don't see it anymore. My apologies I thought it was a thing for certain.

Back to subject though, I actually found the style of temple releases odd as well. I would have thought they would release them with there aligned minor gods ({Temple of Malice} + {Mogis, God of Slaughter} Etc.)

Silent1236

Quote from: Johng4490 on March 06, 2014, 01:46:16 PM
Could have sworn we had a PG-9 rule or something of the similar

The app is rated PG-9, so we were told to keep it like that haha.  Or at least it was like that forever ago.  Don't really know what Piotr thinks about that now.

Johng4490

I've been here about two years so there's no telling when I read that.. Lol. Thought it had been law.

MisterJH

Quote from: ConanEdo on March 06, 2014, 02:41:43 PM
The original set had 5 temples that matched with guilds seen in Gatecrash, to push those colors since they saw less play than those in RTR.

So youre saying its split 5-3-2? Now im even more POd because that makes about the same amount of sense(none!) as i originally thought but they werent even split evenly in the first 2 sets. How difficult would it have been to go 5-5? No, 5-3-2 makes WAAAAY MORE SENSE RIGHT?! Especially when the 2 that arent printed are 2 guilds that dont DO ANYTHING as far as i can tell! Theyre not even dominant!

rarehuntertay

They could just do an incomplete cycle. They have done that before...

MuggyWuggy

Hopefully izzet will actually get some love in this third set.

They have been sitting in the corner for months twiddling their fingers in the dark

ibtrickey

They did it like that for when rotation happens and those last two will be the two left to give the people who like those styles a chance in standard play:) actually makes more sense to me..

Sparkle Ninja

I just want a blue red temple for my commander deck. It would make it so there are no basics in the entire deck...