To Win, There Must Be Sacrifices.

Started by Spencer Addington, November 06, 2013, 09:15:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Spencer Addington


To Win, There Must Be Sacrifices.

60 cards, 0 sideboard


8 {Plains}
8 {Swamp}
4 {Isolated Chapel}

20 lands


3 {Harvester of Souls}
3 {Reaper from the Abyss}
4 {Carrion Feeder}
4 {Blood Artist}
4 {Doomed Traveler}
4 {Thraben Doomsayer}

22 creatures


4 {Altar's Reap}
4 {Increasing Devotion}
4 {Lingering Souls}
2 {Bubbling Cauldron}
4 {Gather the Townsfolk}

18 other spells


Sideboard

Notes:
So I wanted to take a crack at a sacrifice deck, and I'm pretty happy with it. Suggestions are always appreciated.

Skyshadow731

You should put in {sorin, lord of inistrad}{suture priest} {field of souls}

Ekann1

With so many humans I'd play more necromancers. I'd also play cartel aristocrat as a 2-of for another sac outlet.

Spencer Addington

Quote from: E.kann1 on November 06, 2013, 10:16:18 PM
With so many humans I'd play more necromancers. I'd also play {cartel aristocrat} as a 2-of for another sac outlet.
Thanks :)

Spencer Addington


Ekann1

I might also cut an increasing devotion or 2 (unless you already did) running 4 when they are 5 mana is a bit many. They will sit in your hand and will be dead draws early game. I'd play 2-3.

Spencer Addington

Quote from: E.kann1 on November 06, 2013, 10:34:48 PM
I might also cut an increasing devotion or 2 (unless you already did) running 4 when they are 5 mana is a bit many. They will sit in your hand and will be dead draws early game. I'd play 2-3.
Will do :)

Spikepit

{Ravenous Demon} / {Archdemon of Greed}!!!

Spencer Addington

Quote from: Spikepit on November 06, 2013, 11:18:32 PM
{Ravenous Demon} / {Archdemon of Greed}!!!
It seems kinda risky for what it actually is. If, for some reason I can't sac anything, the reproductions could be disastrous.

LordJanova


Spencer Addington

Quote from: LordJanova on November 06, 2013, 11:54:08 PM
{Mortician Beetle}?
Dude... Love that suggestion. Like, SO much. Thank you

LordJanova

Quote from: Spencer_addington on November 07, 2013, 12:03:34 AM
Quote from: LordJanova on November 06, 2013, 11:54:08 PM
{Mortician Beetle}?
Dude... Love that suggestion. Like, SO much. Thank you

Of course dude, it's no problem at all. Anything to help a fellow magic player. :)

Yugornot

Quote from: Spencer_addington on November 06, 2013, 11:24:07 PM
Quote from: Spikepit on November 06, 2013, 11:18:32 PM
{Ravenous Demon} / {Archdemon of Greed}!!!
It seems kinda risky for what it actually is. If, for some reason I can't sac anything, the reproductions could be disastrous.

I have this deck (well, a deck very similar to it) and with this much stuff to sac fueling the demons isn't a problem.

Charbelchers rage

Wait with the beetle wouldn't {innocent blood} be a good card? It would get to counters turn 2-3 and let you have an early threat

Spencer Addington

Quote from: Charbelchers rage on November 07, 2013, 09:51:25 PM
Wait with the beetle wouldn't {innocent blood} be a good card? It would get to counters turn 2-3 and let you have an early threat
That a good point :)