60 cards

[Necromancerman]

My friend for the first time in 3 weeks beat me in a game I noticed his deck looked a bit small I checked it and it was 59 cards he lost due to a technicality and i was wondering why did wizards of the coast make the rule it has to have 60 cards to be a legal deck

[AkiraDeLaine]

Same thing true for the 4cards rule I guess

[Mattao19]

Same thing true for the 4cards rule I guess

Before the 4 card rule decks ran land, {Channel} and {Fireball} hence the team name Channel Fireball

[Kaleo42]

Same thing true for the 4cards rule I guess

Before the 4 card rule decks ran land, {Channel} and {Fireball} hence the team name Channel Fireball

They didnt run land they ran {black lotus}.

[LordJanova]

8 cards deck
4 lotus
2 fireball
2 channel

7 cards hand to start
1 card to draw first turn
Death

That's pretty filthy.

[Pirate John]

Same thing true for the 4cards rule I guess

Before the 4 card rule decks ran land, {Channel} and {Fireball} hence the team name Channel Fireball

Learned something new today. Always played in the Bay Area. Suprised I didn't hear that before

[Sardok]

My friend for the first time in 3 weeks beat me in a game I noticed his deck looked a bit small I checked it and it was 59 cards he lost due to a technicality and i was wondering why did wizards of the coast make the rule it has to have 60 cards to be a legal deck

You noticed the deck was a bit small based on the omission of a single card? That's literally less than 2% of a legal deck

[Giggle the Draco Genius]

My friend for the first time in 3 weeks beat me in a game I noticed his deck looked a bit small I checked it and it was 59 cards he lost due to a technicality and i was wondering why did wizards of the coast make the rule it has to have 60 cards to be a legal deck

You noticed the deck was a bit small based on the omission of a single card? That's literally less than 2% of a legal deck

Idk, I think I like the fact that he said his friend beat him, THEN he noticed it was a bit small of a deck, so he did a deck check and won on a technicality.

[Mattao19]

My friend for the first time in 3 weeks beat me in a game I noticed his deck looked a bit small I checked it and it was 59 cards he lost due to a technicality and i was wondering why did wizards of the coast make the rule it has to have 60 cards to be a legal deck

You noticed the deck was a bit small based on the omission of a single card? That's literally less than 2% of a legal deck

Idk, I think I like the fact that he said his friend beat him, THEN he noticed it was a bit small of a deck, so he did a deck check and won on a technicality.

Truth^

[TrollinOtter]

Is there a top limit like the max cards u can have?

[Steerpike]

Nope

[Mattao19]

Is there a top limit like the max cards u can have?

You just need to be able to shuffle by yourself

[ThassaDevoted]

Nothing funnier than watching someone try and shuffle a {Battle of Wits} deck by themselves.

[Birdbrain]

Nothing funnier than watching someone try and shuffle a {Battle of Wits} deck by themselves.

they could shuffle it in 60 card bits, than break it up, shuffle new 60 card piles, repeat once more and have the opponent cut by choosing the order the cards go back

[ThassaDevoted]

That's how I've always done it. Me and a friend built a couple for fun, and while playing he knocked over his deck. Very funny, but now we stick to a max of 100 for our casual games.