Provocative Video Game Characters

[Hunteroffire9]

It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible

[Hunteroffire9]

How do we know that?
As much as you know it might harm me.

you are the first person to raise a concern, and you have stated that this does not affect anyone in particular, and although you have alluded to it, you have not stated that this topic has caused harm to you personally either. No victim=no crime.

I do not have to say there is a victim or I am a victim for it to be a crime there just has to be one.

Maybe the person does not feal comfortable saying they are the
Victim.

if nobody states that they were personally harmed by the ideas presented in this thread, there is no victim, thus, no crime has been committed.

The person does not have to state they are harmed they just have to be the victim

by that logic, anything and everything that may possibly harm anyone, even if it does not, is a crime, correct?

Maybe it is, therefor the imtg law needs rethinking.

[Apathy Reactor]

It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible

but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.

[Hunteroffire9]

It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible

but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.

With your logic if a man kills somone and we don't know it's completely ok to kill people as long as no one finds out your not breaking the law.

[Apathy Reactor]

It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible

but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.

With your logic if a man kills somone and we don't know it's completely ok to kill people as long as no one finds out your not breaking the law.

no, murder in not acceptable, but by my logic, how can punishment be delt if the authorities do not find the body or know what happened? They can't! Thus, morally, a crime was committed, but to the authorities and others, it was a mysterious dissapearence and noone is to blame.

[Hunteroffire9]

It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible

but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.

With your logic if a man kills somone and we don't know it's completely ok to kill people as long as no one finds out your not breaking the law.

no, murder in not acceptable, but by my logic, how can punishment be delt if the authorities do not find the body or know what happened? They can't! Thus, morally, a crime was committed, but to the authorities and others, it was a mysterious dissapearence and noone is to blame.

Maybe I am the victim to this.?

[Apathy Reactor]

It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible

but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.

With your logic if a man kills somone and we don't know it's completely ok to kill people as long as no one finds out your not breaking the law.

no, murder in not acceptable, but by my logic, how can punishment be delt if the authorities do not find the body or know what happened? They can't! Thus, morally, a crime was committed, but to the authorities and others, it was a mysterious dissapearence and noone is to blame.

Maybe I am the victim to this.?

,_, well sorry, gee, have you been murdered recently? No? Didn't think so, you are not a victim of this.

[Hunteroffire9]

It sais: no victim= no crime it does not say if victim does not say he is the victim it is not a crime. And if it was changed to that, that's saying if somone was killed(which is agaist imtg law) they would have to state it which is impossible

but, we would know that that person was harmed, whereas here, in unstated, we cannot possibly know if someone was harmed, thus no victim.

With your logic if a man kills somone and we don't know it's completely ok to kill people as long as no one finds out your not breaking the law.

no, murder in not acceptable, but by my logic, how can punishment be delt if the authorities do not find the body or know what happened? They can't! Thus, morally, a crime was committed, but to the authorities and others, it was a mysterious dissapearence and noone is to blame.

Maybe I am the victim to this.?

,_, well sorry, gee, have you been murdered recently? No? Didn't think so, you are not a victim of this.

I ment victim of this thread

[Apathy Reactor]

Well, are you? Yes or no?

[Hunteroffire9]

No, I give to sorry.

[Pslider]

If your offended by this topic why are you in here?¿?

[Hunteroffire9]

No, I give to sorry.

Sorry about ranting. I just kind of lost it when I lost 10 karma from 15 to 5

[Birdbrain]

To end this argument. To all younger ones:
Every other person on this planet is a human being with thoughts, feelings, and desires just like you. It is ok to admire someone's beauty, but keep in mind that they are a human being too. And so should be treated like you would want to be treated. Keep a balance between the two

Happy?

[Silent1236]

....ffs

[Apathy Reactor]

To end this argument. To all younger ones:
Every other person on this planet is a human being with thoughts, feelings, and desires just like you. It is ok to admire someone's beauty, but keep in mind that they are a human being too. And so should be treated like you would want to be treated.

Happy?

happy, now lets all settle down over a pint, shall we?