OP card?

[Apathy Reactor]

Well..... derp.

[Kaleo42]

If this is what you consider OP then you might want to work on valuing instants and removal. A {searing spear} or {ulvenwald tracker} fixxes this issue.

[Quisequise]

Well, someone didnt like the rule. Sorry if it's the wrong one.

[Spikepit]

Tapping for an ability CAN be used as an instant

Otherwise, {Royal Assassin} wouldn't be the boss he is.

[EvACiDe]

Tapping for an ability CAN be used as an instant

Otherwise, {Royal Assassin} wouldn't be the boss he is.

Same with {avatar of woe}

[Phoenix X30]

 {Pox} in multiway.

[Mlerner12]

{Elitr Arcanist} 1 with {Boros Charm}, number two with {Supreme Verdict}. "Oh, you've got 27 8/8s with trample? No, you have none."

[EvACiDe]

{Elitr Arcanist} 1 with {Boros Charm}, number two with {Supreme Verdict}. "Oh, you've got 27 8/8s with trample? No, you have none."

{elite arcanist} with ANY of the charms

[Mlerner12]

{Elitr Arcanist} 1 with {Boros Charm}, number two with {Supreme Verdict}. "Oh, you've got 27 8/8s with trample? No, you have none."

{elite arcanist} with ANY of the charms

Boros Charm for Indestructable

[Birdbrain]

And you thought slivers were bad...
{silence}
Well you just broke a lot of decks...
Also why doesn't red have ANY enchantment removal?

red doesn't have enchantment removal because red cant deal with things that aren't tangible. Red understands bashing and smashing things, but it can't think things through enough to find a way to smash enchantments. Not to say red isn't smart, there are a lot of really emotional people that are brilliant people. Still, you can't break an enchantment by beating at it with a giant stick

[Mlerner12]

And you thought slivers were bad...
{silence}
Well you just broke a lot of decks...
Also why doesn't red have ANY enchantment removal?

red doesn't have enchantment removal because red cant deal with things that aren't tangible. Red understands bashing and smashing things, but it can't think things through enough to find a way to smash enchantments. Not to say red isn't smart, there are a lot of really emotional people that are brilliant people. Still, you can't break an enchantment by beating at it with a giant stick

Chandra destroyed a spirit (not tangible) WITHOUT a stick. She used fire. It was in "the purifying fire".

[Birdbrain]

And you thought slivers were bad...
{silence}
Well you just broke a lot of decks...
Also why doesn't red have ANY enchantment removal?

red doesn't have enchantment removal because red cant deal with things that aren't tangible. Red understands bashing and smashing things, but it can't think things through enough to find a way to smash enchantments. Not to say red isn't smart, there are a lot of really emotional people that are brilliant people. Still, you can't break an enchantment by beating at it with a giant stick

Chandra destroyed a spirit (not tangible) WITHOUT a stick. She used fire. It was in "the purifying fire".

hmm...well, that was my understanding. And I guess a spirit is a physical manifestation of a dead persons soul?

[Mlerner12]

And you thought slivers were bad...
{silence}
Well you just broke a lot of decks...
Also why doesn't red have ANY enchantment removal?

red doesn't have enchantment removal because red cant deal with things that aren't tangible. Red understands bashing and smashing things, but it can't think things through enough to find a way to smash enchantments. Not to say red isn't smart, there are a lot of really emotional people that are brilliant people. Still, you can't break an enchantment by beating at it with a giant stick

Chandra destroyed a spirit (not tangible) WITHOUT a stick. She used fire. It was in "the purifying fire".

hmm...well, that was my understanding. And I guess a spirit is a physical manifestation of a dead persons soul?

And you forget, I think, the "Emotuon, passion, fire" part of red. Also in that book, these people were going to war with her kingdom to capture her, but she thought it through and turned herself in. So there's ONE person. 😉 Also, most of the Izzet and Boros..

[Birdbrain]

Tell all that to head designer Mark Rosewater, because I was paraphrasing him

And I suppose not thinking things through, must mean they think with there emotions and don't like to go through long thought processes.

[Mlerner12]

Hmm... A small portion of red thinks things through. But not much.