Gruul Aggro

[XxXxXxSWSxXxXxX]

Gruul Aggro 75 cards, 15 sideboard 12 {Forest} 4 {Rootbound Crag} 8 {Mountain} 24 lands 4 {Flinthoof Boar} 4 {Strangleroot Geist} 4 {Wolfir Silverheart} 4 {Arbor Elf} 1 {Gyre Sage} 4 {Young Wolf} 4 {Slaughterhorn} 4 {Burning-Tree Emissary} 29 creatures 1 {Garruk, Primal Hunter} 4 {Rancor} 2 {Domri Rade} 7 other spells Sideboard 4 {Searing Spear} 2 {Skarrg Guildmage} 4 {Prey Upon} 1 {Gruul Ragebeast} 4 {Clan Defiance} 15 sideboard cards Notes: Looking for feedback, trying to get this running as good as possible by Friday

[Desolatus]

Here's some advice:

-1 Gyre Sage
-4 Arbor Elf
-4 Young Wolf
-4 Silverheart
-1 Domri
-1 Garruk
-1 Slaughterhorn

Move the Searing Spears mainboard (+4 Searing Spear), add
+4 {Ghor-Clan Rampager}
+4 {Stromkirk Noble}
+4 {Rakdos Cackler}

And 4 {Pillar of Flame} in the sideboard to replace the Spears.

Here's why:

Your Aggro looks like it would take too long to kill your opponents in the current standard. With the plethora of Mid-Range decks out there, your deck needs to get them from 20 to 0 as fast as possible, before they stabilize. The burn spells will win you a lot more games than the planeswalkers. Your curve will be lower (The Bloodrush also helps quite a bit), and the deck shouldn't be as vulnerable to removal. If you are having trouble with anything in particular, let me know and I'd be happy to help out.


Edit: I would also recommend you drop the other three Slaughterhorns for three {Hellrider}.

[XxXxXxSWSxXxXxX]

Thank you, what about an opinion on Lightning Mauler?

[Drewy]

Its an amazing card

[XxXxXxSWSxXxXxX]

Good for this deck or not?

[ThE_OwL]

Yes you would benefit a lot from him.

[XxXxXxSWSxXxXxX]

Sounds good, any other suggestions?

[Ocelot823]

Also  {Rakdos Cackler} and then  {Thundermaw Hellkite} as a finisher.