WU Control

Started by ChrisRodriguez, September 24, 2012, 04:13:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ChrisRodriguez

Quote from: Falcon182 on September 28, 2012, 12:43:01 AM
Also {judge's familiar} is a card.
Yes it is but I rather use {dispel} if I'm gonna that route. Because it is a hard counter.

ChrisRodriguez

Quote from: Falcon182 on September 28, 2012, 12:41:25 AM
Why no {terminus}? With many aggro decks having from the grave abilities like scavenge, not to mention regeneration (which your only board wipe is weak to) putting a card on the bottom of their library is pretty powerful, moreso for {W}.
The updated list is the list I plan on using.

smokin terry

Quote from: Willthomjr on September 27, 2012, 12:23:35 AM
U control deck with no counter magic?

*faint*
Field control is so much more fun. And there is more then just stack control.

Edit.
Like the list a lot. Maybe try adding another rift or 2 main board.

Falcon182

Quote from: ChrisRodriguez on September 28, 2012, 12:54:01 AM
Quote from: Falcon182 on September 28, 2012, 12:43:01 AM
Also {judge's familiar} is a card.
Yes it is but I rather use {dispel} if I'm gonna that route. Because it is a hard counter.
It's not so much the counter that matters, it's the tempo generated when you can play him turn 1, delaying anything the opponent does by a whole turn. Plus you're pinging for 1 every turn.

ChrisRodriguez

Quote from: Falcon182 on September 28, 2012, 01:15:01 AM
Quote from: ChrisRodriguez on September 28, 2012, 12:54:01 AM
Quote from: Falcon182 on September 28, 2012, 12:43:01 AM
Also {judge's familiar} is a card.
Yes it is but I rather use {dispel} if I'm gonna that route. Because it is a hard counter.
It's not so much the counter that matters, it's the tempo generated when you can play him turn 1, delaying anything the opponent does by a whole turn. Plus you're pinging for 1 every turn.
It's an creature heavy environment. By playing the familiar I'm not slowing anything down. Since it only counters instant or sorcery. Now if it {force spike}ed that would be a different story.

Falcon182


Sewell92

How has the low land count worked? Seems like you need at least 2 more lands

ChrisRodriguez

Quote from: Sewell92 on September 28, 2012, 04:26:29 PM
How has the low land count worked? Seems like you need at least 2 more lands
The land has been working great for me. I usually play 25 in a control deck, but I have been running into a lot of mana flooding so I did 24.