Carnival Of Blood

12 Swamp
12 Mountain
24 lands


2 Vampire Interloper
2 Bloodlord of Vaasgoth
3 Blood Seeker
2 Rakish Heir
2 Falkenrath Marauders
2 Stromkirk Patrol
2 Crossway Vampire
2 Markov Patrician
1 Sengir Vampire
1 Bloodline Keeper
2 Falkenrath Noble
1 Night Revelers
1 Child of Night
23 creatures


4 Doom Blade
1 Traitorous Blood
1 Vampiric Fury
1 Night Terrors
2 Mask of Avacyn
1 Gruesome Deformity
1 Tectonic Rift
1 Tribute to Hunger
1 Traveler's Amulet
13 other spells


Sideboard
Notes:



Load & View in Deck Builder (Beta)

My fnm deck

How consistent is it?

Extreaily they gain counters fast and hit hard

Nice I think I might try this if ya don't mind.

I don't mind just watch for clumping as that happens it runs great even with small clumping

How consistent is it?

Idk where you people attend your local fnm, but here where I reside, this deck will go 0-5 if lucky. (not to be harsh) but this deck runs on small and fragile creatures. I can't say it any other way, these creatures will simply be outclassed past turn 2

Idk where you people attend your local fnm, but here where I reside, this deck will go 0-5 if lucky. (not to be harsh) but this deck runs on small and fragile creatures. I can't say it any other way, these creatures will simply be outclassed past turn 2

You must have a pretty good environment/meta. Any suggestions for "classier" creatures?

Quote from: Appleguru56 on December 14, 2011, 09:59:21 PM

Idk where you people attend your local fnm, but here where I reside, this deck will go 0-5 if lucky. (not to be harsh) but this deck runs on small and fragile creatures. I can't say it any other way, these creatures will simply be outclassed past turn 2

You must have a pretty good environment/meta. Any suggestions for "classier" creatures?

3 bloodlord of vaasgoth
3 bloodline keeper
2 Olivia voldaren
4 stormkirk noble
3 rakish heir
3 stormblood berserker

3 doomblade
1 dismember
4 curse of stalked prey
2 brimstone volley
2 slagstorm
3 geistflame

1 sorin markov

4 blackcleve cliffs
4 dragonskull summit
2 stensia bloodhall
2 ghost quarters
7 swamp
7 mountain

Well, ask for some cards, get a whole deck!

Is this more control based strategy?

Well, ask for some cards, get a whole deck!

Is this more control based strategy?

This deck is base on solidity. I'm not trying to build the next format defining deck so I didn't alter the theme much. This deck is built to survive the toughest things that the current metagame can throw. It could be called a control deck, but that would be a lie. An aggro deck, but that would be lies too.

Um not fragile the all gain counters and get bigger play test a deck before u say stuff

I've played it. It runs pretty great. Nothing against my green elf deck big creature deck. 10 minutes ago he went -64,430 XD

Quote from: Thattallguy on December 14, 2011, 06:09:52 PM

How consistent is it?

Idk where you people attend your local fnm, but here where I reside, this deck will go 0-5 if lucky. (not to be harsh) but this deck runs on small and fragile creatures. I can't say it any other way, these creatures will simply be outclassed past turn 2

QFT, sadly. I would work out a much more leaner vampires build, something like

4 Stromkirk Noble
4 Vampire Interloper
4 Rakish Heir
2 Olivia Voldaren

Maybe some burn, but that's about it for the crux of the deck.

Um not fragile the all gain counters and get bigger play test a deck before u say stuff

Oh, your definition of good isn't the same as mine.