Piotr's been flooding the Magic Discussion board with repostings of user reviews. Why? They're not relevant to the game, and they don't add much discussion at all. I'm confused.
Well, when Piotr reads this I'll probably get yelled at but.
Piotr is inflating his ego. I'm assuming it ends up in Discussion (for MtG so, the wrong area) because that's the highest traffic area on the forums (that I'm aware of).
No, I learned from Donald Trump and I discarded my ego. I have none left, it was just a nuisance.
I find that very hard to believe.
Find what hard to believe? The some one could learn from Donald trump? That trump discarded his ego? That an ego is a nuisance? Or that Piotr doesn't have an ego?
No, I learned from Donald Trump and I discarded my ego. I have none left, it was just a nuisance.
I find that very hard to believe.
Find what hard to believe? The some one could learn from Donald trump? That trump discarded his ego? That an ego is a nuisance? Or that Piotr doesn't have an ego?
Webster definition is confusing, is it not?* The point is, if Trump had no ego, he would behave exactly as he does. Richard Feynman also had no ego. Check his book: What Do You Care What Other People Think?
* I mean, my definition works well for me, how about you ;]
I didn't know we were allowed to make up new definitions for words..
Lol yes you are Language is a living thing, my definition fits how the people use and understand the word. It works with the Webster definition too, in a funny kind of way. Only stupid people have ego, you see ;]
This definition www.merriam-.....ctionary/ego and what words you use to define it are different. Yes words change and evolve. Just because you and your group of friends define it that way does not make its meaning change to the rest of the world. Being a society ( if you are being part of it) you agree to certain things being true. Example using Webster as a use for defining words. Yes there can be a language difference but that still does not make it correct.
Webster definition is confusing, is it not?* The point is, if Trump had no ego, he would behave exactly as he does. Richard Feynman also had no ego. Check his book: What Do You Care What Other People Think?
* I mean, my definition works well for me, how about you ;]
No the definition works fine for me I do not find it confusing. English is my first language so it may be unfair me to expect you who speaks several other languages to understand English as well.
No I didn't read his book but that is a whole other discussion that I do not wish to delve into at this time possibly ever.
I just don't see how you can say you or Donald trump do not have an ego under the Webster defines it.