Let's be honest.

Started by Leviathan, June 29, 2012, 01:15:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Willthomjr

Quote from: Leviathan on June 29, 2012, 01:34:07 AM
Quote from: Knew45 on June 29, 2012, 01:32:47 AM
That actually sounds like it has a chance in casual play. I really wanna be that one guy who walks up with my 230 card deck and is like. Sup

The stared you'd get would be P-R-I-C-E-L-E-S-S

Lmfao, hey wanna play?

Pull out your 4 deck boxes and start shuffling them all together. You got 24 piles of 10. 😂

Knew45

Lol. Ill just go ahaed and use my shoebox as a deckbox

Kuberr

Quote from: Willthomjr on June 29, 2012, 01:37:52 AM
Quote from: Leviathan on June 29, 2012, 01:34:07 AM
Quote from: Knew45 on June 29, 2012, 01:32:47 AM
That actually sounds like it has a chance in casual play. I really wanna be that one guy who walks up with my 230 card deck and is like. Sup

The stared you'd get would be P-R-I-C-E-L-E-S-S

Lmfao, hey wanna play?

Pull out your 4 deck boxes and start shuffling them all together. You got 24 piles of 10. 😂

You shuffle ten cards at a time?

Quackmaster5

In casual, cards like {wheel of sun and moon} would definately be useful for this. Self mill til you get it and then play it.

Knew45

Just posted a rough idea in casual. Title: battle of wits

Dudecore

It's just a trash card....you have to build the dumbest, most unfun deck ever to make it work.

Thorn

Quote from: Dudecore on June 29, 2012, 07:01:57 AM
It's just a trash card....you have to build the dumbest, most unfun deck ever to make it work.
DREAM SQUASHER! DREAM SQUASHER! DREAM SQUASHER!

jk

Quackmaster5

They should have made it a mythic and changed it.

Duel of Witts
3{U}{U}{U}

Enchant player
At the beginning of enchanted players upkeep, if that player has 200 or more cards in there deck, they win the game. If not, that. Player puts the top 10 cards of their library into his or her graveyard.

It's a win con for that player but also a constant mill.

cltrn81

I am all for unique win-cons but this card just stinks. 

Dudecore

#24
Quote from: cltrn81 on June 29, 2012, 08:42:18 AM
I am all for unique win-cons but this card just stinks.

The card is enraging. Who has 200 cards in their library?!? It's just such an atrocious Wincon that I'll nominate it for one of the worst cards to ever be printed. No hyperbole.

You need a minimum of 300 cards probably, every such tutor, you need to avoid being milled any, have a strong enough deck to win otherwise, and stall the crap out of them and hope to top {battle of wits}, which costs 5cmc in its own right. Grrrrr hate, hate, hate

Knew45


Dudecore

Imagine getting a booster pack, a box, maybe a fat pack...opening up a booster and seeing {Battle of Wits} as your rare. It's insultingly bad, and zero thought and effort put into including this card.

Standard has 2 tutors? Legacy has a million, and already had {battle of wits}!

Knew45

If i end up pulling it. Im making that deck i posted.

Tetsomori

Im building the deck.. Its gonna be {u} {b} {w} and ita gonna contain like 5 different decklists plus all the tutors :)

BlackJester

{Battle of Wits} forces you to think outside the deckbox.  Yeah, it'll make the rounds in draft and useless in any limited enviro, but I just read a funny idea for a 60-card BoW deck.  Checkit!

http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/60-card-battle-of-wits-1/

tl;dr  Activate {Spawnsire of Ulamog}'s ability to put 200 Eldrazi into play, then {Hallowed Burial} or {Terminus}.  ;)