Eternal Masters

Started by rarehuntertay, February 15, 2016, 11:05:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

rarehuntertay

Quote from: Ace on February 16, 2016, 09:57:51 PM
Quote from: rarehuntertay on February 16, 2016, 08:33:42 PM
Quote from: blackychan1 on February 16, 2016, 07:17:02 PM
We may end up getting the whole list early....

http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/news/statement-about-eternal-masters-card-list-2016-02-16
Starting to sound like the New Phyrexia fiasco all over again

What new phyrexia fiasco?
Someone posted the entire set listing something like 3-4 months before the release date. It resulted in the offending parties being terminated by Wizards

Mattao19


Thefluffymacheen

Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 17, 2016, 03:49:51 PM
So what do you guys think? Reliable spoiler? My gut tells me this is true.
On one hand, I don't want wizards to reprint dozens of super expensive cards for the sake of the market but on the other hand I think they might just be stupid enough to do so.

Johng4490

Should I sell off Lilianas now? I got two I've been waiting for a peak to sell.

redwolv

Quote from: Thefluffymacheen on February 17, 2016, 04:48:52 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 17, 2016, 03:49:51 PM
So what do you guys think? Reliable spoiler? My gut tells me this is true.
On one hand, I don't want wizards to reprint dozens of super expensive cards for the sake of the market but on the other hand I think they might just be stupid enough to do so.
It would anger the comunity for older formats but WotC makes little off the older markets. Reprinting old and valuable cards puts money in their pockets. It might be dumb from a PR stance, but economicly it is a sound way to bump revenue.

blackychan1

Quote from: redwolv on February 17, 2016, 05:15:11 PM
Quote from: Thefluffymacheen on February 17, 2016, 04:48:52 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 17, 2016, 03:49:51 PM
So what do you guys think? Reliable spoiler? My gut tells me this is true.
On one hand, I don't want wizards to reprint dozens of super expensive cards for the sake of the market but on the other hand I think they might just be stupid enough to do so.
It would anger the comunity for older formats but WotC makes little off the older markets. Reprinting old and valuable cards puts money in their pockets. It might be dumb from a PR stance, but economicly it is a sound way to bump revenue.
traditionally, they will only print a few expensive chase cards per set like this. then they can save the rest to use to boost revenue for other sets.

Thefluffymacheen

Quote from: blackychan1 on February 17, 2016, 05:26:59 PM
Quote from: redwolv on February 17, 2016, 05:15:11 PM
Quote from: Thefluffymacheen on February 17, 2016, 04:48:52 PM
Quote from: GlowackAttack on February 17, 2016, 03:49:51 PM
So what do you guys think? Reliable spoiler? My gut tells me this is true.
On one hand, I don't want wizards to reprint dozens of super expensive cards for the sake of the market but on the other hand I think they might just be stupid enough to do so.
It would anger the comunity for older formats but WotC makes little off the older markets. Reprinting old and valuable cards puts money in their pockets. It might be dumb from a PR stance, but economicly it is a sound way to bump revenue.
traditionally, they will only print a few expensive chase cards per set like this. then they can save the rest to use to boost revenue for other sets.
That's why I'm confident that the list is fake.  I can't see them reprinting {Liliana of the Veil}, {Jace the Mind Sculptor}, {Snapcaster Mage} and how many other insanely expensive cards all in the same set.  I can see them being broken up into maybe 2-3 eternal masters sets but certainly not all in the same set.

blackychan1

Wait, that list?? The one on 4chan?? OP admitted that he had made it up. Also, it contains a reserved list card.

imFourth of Phils

even some reprint cards had reprint (also special reprints)

like {Phyrexian Negator} and {Phyrexian Dreadnought}

Avnger345

Quote from: blackychan1 on February 16, 2016, 12:15:25 PM
This may or may not be worth noting though. (Taken from that 4chan link)

https://mobile.twitter.com/Vendorleak

Apparently sombody sold out the leaker who predicted the bannings and eternal masters, he countered by using his "resources" and outting vendors who do inside trading.


Personally, I still think it's fake.
However, I wouldn't be too surprised to see a list like this one.

Looks like vendorleaks acct was deleted

rarehuntertay

Quote from: imFourth of Phils on February 18, 2016, 12:26:42 AM
even some reprint cards had reprint (also special reprints)

like {Phyrexian Negator} and {Phyrexian Dreadnought}
Negator was added into that DD at the last possible second and was overlooked.
Reserved list cards used to be able to be printed as Judge foil, but they closed that loophole years ago.

InfinitiveDivinity

I was a foil {Copy Artifact}!! 😣

Themugz

Preordered a box at 261 after tax

Post your prices!

Kaylesh

Quote from: MuggyWuggy on February 16, 2016, 01:57:59 PM
Maelstrom wandered, cascade Minotaur wizard, bloodbraid and Shardless


All PERFECT for a reprint
They won't be in EMA, seeing as they'll be reprinted in PCA.

Themugz

Are you 100% on that? I say only due to shardless judge promo