Rakdos aggro FNM

[Fortuity]

Rakdos aggro FNM 72 cards, 12 sideboard 12 {Mountain} 4 {Dragonskull Summit} 4 {Blood Crypt} 3 {Swamp} 23 lands 4 {Rakdos Cackler} 4 {Rakdos Shred-Freak} 2 {Bloodfray Giant} 4 {Ash Zealot} 2 {Hellrider} 4 {Stromkirk Noble} 4 {Hellhole Flailer} 24 creatures 2 {Dreadbore} 3 {Brimstone Volley} 4 {Pillar of Flame} 4 {Searing Spear} 13 other spells Sideboard 3 {Electrickery} 3 {Annihilating Fire} 3 {Auger Spree} 3 {Mizzium Mortars} 12 sideboard cards

[Fortuity]

Need suggestions as to make it better and need tons of help with sideboard.  Have played this casually against several decks (modern elf trample, graveyard etc. ) and it has done very well but am looking to play it at FNM.  Thanks!

[Harvest]

Why not {lightning bolt} instead of searing spear?

[Mikefrompluto]

Why not {lightning bolt} instead of searing spear?

Its not standard legal

[Jarrk]

 {Slaughter Games} and  {Tormod's Crypt} for side board, i would put 2 of each.

[Fortuity]

Anyone else?

[Wackaman9001]

Drop shred freaks in favor of kill spells like {murder} or {ultimate price}, help keep the field clear to push in more hits

[Mike_garzone]

You should definetly make room for some {madcap skills}, toss it in a {Stromkirk nonbeliever} t2 and he can get pretty scary fast. A set of {vexing devil} definetly wouldn't go wrong either!

Edit:{Stromkirk noble}...damn spell check lol

[Fortuity]

I've heard mixed thoughts on  {Vexing Devil} , what do y'all think?

[Mike_garzone]

When I play the devil I play him automatically assuming that hell be sac'ed, taking up a spot I normally would reserve for burn spells. He's not reliable as a creature though unfortunately, 90% of the time people will have you sac him. If you build him into your deck with this mentality, he's a lot more likely to work!