Something we haven't done yet...

[Iandtormentor]

Ok, got it

[Birdbrain]

{G}

Natures recruit's

Put a 1/1 green creature token in play that is either a elf, beast, or tree folk

[Iandtormentor]

Fires of the forge
{R}{R}

Deal 3 damage to target creature or player. If you control an artifact deal 4 damage instead.

[Birdbrain]

Fires of the forge
{R}{R}

Deal 3 damage to target creature or player. If you control an artifact deal 4 damage instead.

is this for progress?

[Iandtormentor]

Yes

[Birdbrain]

Just realized. Ecobound encourages an aggro style play, while divergence encourages a control style play. Using one in one set and the other in two set would be a good idea for the players that like different strategies

[Iandtormentor]

Yes it does!!

[Birdbrain]

Maybe we could make one side aggro and the other side control for te first set. And switch for the second set

[Iandtormentor]

Your talking to duel decky both sides need more than one strategy. We could make it so each side had 3 or so clans each had a different strategy?

[FlickerYourOwnIdentity]

{G}

Natures recruit's

Put a 1/1 green creature token in play that is either a elf, beast, or tree folk

You know why I like this?
I FORGOT TREEFOLKS!!!!!!!
thank you for reminding me!

[Birdbrain]

Could do that. the scars block seems all aggro to me. So either option is valid. Although we do need to make a handful of control cards for nature if we use Ecobound

[Iandtormentor]

If we do clans let's base them on creature types not color.

[Birdbrain]

If we do clans let's base them on creature types not color.

so we should make tribal cards than?

Not sure that would work with Ecobound

[Iandtormentor]

That would be neat

[Birdbrain]

Hey dudecore. Can you point out everything you see wrong with Ecobound please? Rip it a new one so I know how to design it properly if it gets picked