Junk Control (testing)

Started by Kaleo42, February 03, 2013, 10:47:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Kaleo42


Junk Control (testing)

75 cards, 15 sideboard


4 {Godless Shrine}
4 {Overgrown Tomb}
4 {Isolated Chapel}
2 {Vault of the Archangel}
4 {Temple Garden}
4 {Woodland Cemetery}
1 {Gavony Township}
2 {Sunpetal Grove}

25 lands


3 {Thragtusk}
1 {Trostani, Selesnya's Voice}
2 {Bloodline Keeper}
1 {Craterhoof Behemoth}
1 {Angel of Serenity}
1 {Armada Wurm}
1 {Obzedat, Ghost Council}

10 creatures


3 {Abrupt Decay}
2 {Entreat the Angels}
1 {Barter in Blood}
2 {Garruk Relentless}
4 {Terminus}
4 {Lingering Souls}
4 {Farseek}
3 {Blind Obedience}
1 {Sorin, Lord of Innistrad}
1 {Curse of Death's Hold}

25 other spells


Sideboard

3 {Loxodon Smiter}
1 {Curse of Death's Hold}
3 {Rhox Faithmender}
1 {Abrupt Decay}
1 {Blind Obedience}
2 {Tribute to Hunger}
4 {Vampire Nighthawk}

15 sideboard cards



Kaleo42

Ill have to get home and look at what those last 3 slots in the sideboard.

Thoughts and questions? What do you think will be a hard match up? (I know {omniscience} combo is a hard match)

Estel2931


Everforward

Seems pretty solid, maybe a bit slow starting off but I prefer a lower mana curve

Kaleo42

Yea I was noticing that. I have 14 early plays (18 with a miracled {terminus}). I would prefer a solid 20, but not having blue makes that hard.

Everforward

Arbor elves are always a nice ramp but I don't think that is quite the right card for the build. Maybe more board control.. Still difficult without blue. If you can mircale entreat of the angels that definetly helps. A person I used to play had a junk token deck and he would run sublime in it

Kaleo42

Trostani came up in testing today and was quickly followed by {obzedat, ghost council}. It was gross.