Sample Deck (RB Vat Aggro)

[Appleguru56]

Sample Deck (RB Vat Aggro) 60 cards, 0 sideboard 3 {Ghost Quarter} 1 {Stensia Bloodhall} 6 {Mountain} 4 {Dragonskull Summit} 4 {Blackcleave Cliffs} 6 {Swamp} 24 lands 2 {Stromkirk Captain} 3 {Olivia Voldaren} 4 {Stormblood Berserker} 4 {Stromkirk Noble} 4 {Bloodline Keeper} 17 creatures 3 {Doom Blade} 4 {Brimstone Volley} 2 {Shrine of Burning Rage} 4 {Curse of Stalked Prey} 1 {Dismember} 2 {Geistflame} 3 {Mimic Vat} 19 other spells Sideboard Notes:

[Appleguru56]

This actually turned out better than I had thought

[Karrthus]

I would take out the bloodhall. I just realized that alot of people are playing R/B +1/+1 counters and are leaving out a key card, {Volt Charge}. I would also try to incorporate {Tezzeret's Gambit}, drawing cards in R/B=lethal. The deck as is, is still pretty nice and looks like a challenge.

[Chaosquirrel]

I had completely forgotten about {Volt Charge} looks like R/G Undying Wolf run will have a new addition.

[Appleguru56]

I would take out the bloodhall. I just realized that alot of people are playing R/B +1/+1 counters and are leaving out a key card, {Volt Charge}. I would also try to incorporate {Tezzeret's Gambit}, drawing cards in R/B=lethal. The deck as is, is still pretty nice and looks like a challenge.

I am very aware of the fact that I can poliferate, but i have no real targets worth proliferating, and I see no reason to add a mislanious draw spell that forces me to lose life.
Now my mana base has no real problems, I may as well have a land that does something, it's better than having a basic land.

[cltrn81]

You have {curse of the stalked prey}, {Stromkirk Noble}, and {stormblood berserker}.  The proliferate was just a suggestions and quite feasable IMO...  Are you posting decks for suggestions or just to prove your self-perceived awesomeness?  If you don't want suggestions then don't post decks....

Edit: not trying to be rude here.....but you should be more tactful in your rebuttal to people offering friendly advice.

[Appleguru56]

You have {curse of the stalked prey}, {Stromkirk Noble}, and {stormblood berserker}.  The proliferate was just a suggestions and quite feasable IMO...  Are you posting decks for suggestions or just to prove your self-perceived awesomeness?  If you don't want suggestions then don't post decks....

Edit: not trying to be rude here.....but you should be more tactful in your rebuttal to people offering friendly advice.

This deck wasn't meant for any advice, merely to show someone from another thread. Afterall, this was labeled sample deck.
If you had seen my other thread, you would know this was to use as an example.
I apologize that I didn't lable this any better than I did to make it more clear that this was for someone particular.

[cltrn81]

Regardless.....Of your intention.  The deck was posted in the most active thread.  You give others criticism so expect the same.  If you disagree then do it with a bit more class is all I'm saying.

[Prophylaxis]

The {Cursed of Stalked Prey} is not worth it IMO.

[BlackJester]

The {Cursed of Stalked Prey} is not worth it IMO.

I ðŸ'œ it in Free-for-All! Here, have a bullseye!

[Drbusta50]

IMO?   I need to learn all the acronyms

[BlackJester]

IMO?   I need to learn all the acronyms

I Know how you you feel.
IMO In my opinion
IMHO In my humble opinion

[loop-s-pool]

The vats do barely anything for this deck? Why slap it in? No ETB effects that I see. This deck seems all over the place with no real goal, other than maybe use keeper to win, because in all reality he closes games quite fast.

[Prophylaxis]

The vats do barely anything for this deck? Why slap it in? No ETB effects that I see. This deck seems all over the place with no real goal, other than maybe use keeper to win, because in all reality he closes games quite fast.

You're right. This just looks like a stock Vampires list with Vats thrown in.