Pure Jank Commander Brewing

[Taysby]

Whole deck revolves around {isochron scepter} {shahrazad} or similar interactions.  The rest is control.

Commander
{oloro, ageless ascetic}

{shahrazad}
{isochron scepter}
{elite arcanist}
{fabricate}
{mystical tutor}
{enlightened tutor}
{personal tutor}

{wrath of god}
{planar clensing}
{day of judgement}
{damnation}
{cyclonic rift}

{force of will}
{mana drain}

{wall of omens}
{kaho, minamoan historian}

[blackychan1]

But... {shahrazad} is banned...

[Munchlax]

But... {shahrazad} is banned...

You're thinking about French
Also, no one will play against you. The card may not be banned but that doesn't mean people will allow you to play with them because it is generally considered to be banned

[Remillo]

That doesn't even work anyways, Tays, Lady Sharazad is a Sorcery!

[Sardok]

But... {shahrazad} is banned...

You're thinking about French
Also, no one will play against you. The card may not be banned but that doesn't mean people will allow you to play with them because it is generally considered to be banned

Wrong, {Shahrazad} is absolutely banned.

[Sardok]

No it's not.
http://mtgcommander.net/rules.php

From that exact website:

"7. Commander is played with Vintage legal cards"

For reference: http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=judge/resources/sfrvintage

[FlickerYourOwnIdentity]

No it's not.
http://mtgcommander.net/rules.php

From that exact website:

"7. Commander is played with Vintage legal cards"


For reference: http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=judge/resources/sfrvintage

We have the list of bans from commander stickied.  And no they are not the same. 

For example, we cannot play {Braids, Cabel Minion} but vintage can.

[griffin131]

No it's not.
http://mtgcommander.net/rules.php

http://tinyleaders.blogspot.com/2013/09/ban-list.html

[Sardok]

No it's not.
http://mtgcommander.net/rules.php

From that exact website:

"7. Commander is played with Vintage legal cards"


For reference: http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=judge/resources/sfrvintage

We have the list of bans from commander stickied.  And no they are not the same. 

For example, we cannot play {Braids, Cabel Minion} but vintage can.

Of course they are not the same. I never said that.

I am saying that the Commander banlist includes the vintage banlist as well.

[FlickerYourOwnIdentity]

But... {shahrazad} is banned...

You're thinking about French
Also, no one will play against you. The card may not be banned but that doesn't mean people will allow you to play with them because it is generally considered to be banned

Wrong, {Shahrazad} is absolutely banned.

Just check our list for instant it's always kept up to date.  {Shahrazad} is ok in commander

[Munchlax]

But... {shahrazad} is banned...

You're thinking about French
Also, no one will play against you. The card may not be banned but that doesn't mean people will allow you to play with them because it is generally considered to be banned

Wrong, {Shahrazad} is absolutely banned.

Just check our list for instant it's always kept up to date.  {Shahrazad} is ok in commander

It is not ok in commander. It is vintage banned so therefore edh banned

[griffin131]

No it's not.
http://mtgcommander.net/rules.php

http://tinyleaders.blogspot.com/2013/09/ban-list.html

This isn't tiny leaders.

Whoops. My bad.