Question of logic

[Distriimuir]

And "facts" from any leftist or rightist sites will be biased towards their stance. Can't take any of those at face value, what could be x number of deaths in a right site, becomes y on a left site. Both are unreliable.

[KILLERBEE]

I think Rass said it best.

This discussion isn't going to sway any opinions. Some of us see Eric Garner's death as a tragedy as a result of oppression against the lower class by authority. Basic human rights aren't present in a first world country. Among those, some feel the authority needs to discipline it's ranks properly rather let them go easily unpunished as we constantly have seen lately & to cease inappropriate brutality on the every day human being.

Others believe a man who led a life as he did led himself into the situation and as unfortunate as his death is, it was not intentional by the officer in question. Therefore the officer shouldn't be responsible for any wrong doing. Even though his approach to the situation, was completely inappropriate. He should get in trouble, but he doesn't deserve a charge a normal citizen would get. Such as manslaughter. As he was just doing his job.

The media presented is biased either way as it supports an opinion. I'm not going to change my opinion, but using the basic logic in the OP.

I would say the man doing the chokehold is doing wrong and harm. The man selling untaxed cigarettes never asked to be taxed in the first place. I'm psure I've read on this forum  "under imtg law, taxes are illegal"

Logic?! omG!!!
< so this is clear, I agree with the reasoning an thought process in the quote. It's just weird seeing logic used on a thread titled "Question of Logic >

[MuggyWuggy]

 it seems logic was thrown out the window with the results of no trial, seeing as there was evidence of wrong doing on part of the officer.

So that's where the question of logic comes in. Was logic used? I don't think so.

[Piotr]

This is my actual quote, I never called anyone specifically an idiot. Novus is right when he says we need to de-escalate the situation though.

At this point its a case of fool me once, shame on you. Fool me tens of thousands of times, and you are a .loving. idiot for still denying the facts.

I find this and similar kind of emotional hateful outbursts, especially using swear words, extremely offensive in this Discussion section. You know that, you have been banned for it in the past already, have you not?