This deck is severely lacking in pump slivers. There are at least 3 +1/+1 slivers that cost 2 mana that are modern legal. They would help your deck a lot, a much better wincon than the mill sliver IMO
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuKuldotha Red 60 cards, 0 sideboard 2 {Teetering Peaks} 16 {Mountain} 18 lands 4 {Goblin Guide} 4 {Signal Pest} 4 {Ornithopter} 4 {Memnite} 4 {Goblin Bushwhacker} 4 {Goblin Wardriver} 4 {Goblin Chieftain} 28 creatures 2 {Galvanic Blast} 3 {Lightning Bolt} 4 {Mox Opal} 1 {Devastating Summons} 4 {Kuldotha Rebirth} 14 other spells Sideboard |
UNFINISHED Zoo 32 cards, 0 sideboard 4 {Knight of the Reliquary} 4 {Loam Lion} 4 {Kird Ape} 4 {Tarmogoyf} 16 creatures 4 {Path to Exile} 4 {Lightning Helix} 4 {Tribal Flames} 4 {Lightning Bolt} 16 other spells Sideboard Notes: Hello, I'm trying to get into modern and want to make a domain zoo deck, but I need suggestions for filling out the rest of my 75! |
Jund 60 cards, 0 sideboard 2 {Stomping Ground} 1 {Swamp} 4 {Misty Rainforest} 2 {Treetop Village} 4 {Overgrown Tomb} 2 {Forest} 4 {Verdant Catacombs} 1 {Mountain} 3 {Raging Ravine} 3 {Blood Crypt} 26 lands 4 {Deathrite Shaman} 4 {Tarmogoyf} 3 {Dark Confidant} 4 {Obstinate Baloth} 15 creatures 3 {Abrupt Decay} 3 {Garruk, Primal Hunter} 4 {Lightning Bolt} 4 {Maelstrom Pulse} 3 {Terminate} 2 {Dreadbore} 19 other spells Sideboard Notes: Jund deck I'm working on, suggestions appreciated |
Quote from: Bman0121 on April 28, 2013, 10:48:04 AMBut it can be, an I don't have the money to make a full deck with every expensive luxury card. Also I'm not planning on trying to win a pro-tour with this deck, so if I have a build that I can afford that works with the bare necessities, I'm going to play it.
A delver deck wasnt meant to be a budget deck
Quote from: Xaol on April 28, 2013, 08:35:14 AMYou have a good point! Completely forgot about it during making the deck, fit them in now, I'll test with them in a bit to see how well they workQuote from: Guitello on April 28, 2013, 02:08:24 AMI agree! You have a strong budget delver deck as is. Have you considered {Izzet Charm}? I say this only because with this deck you're either beating down with delver or controjng the game, and {Izzet Charm} can switch between both.
Sorry, but I said Budget for a reason. Not looking to try and struggle for playsets of $20-40 cards for a deck that functions without them. Especially fetch lands. It has been proven that using 1 fetch land barely reduces your chances of drawing a land. Not worth spending $120 on a playset of fetches for a 2 color deck that doesn't need fixing IMO
UR delver 60 cards, 0 sideboard 4 {Sulfur Falls} 4 {Steam Vents} 8 {Island} 7 {Mountain} 23 lands 4 {Delver of Secrets} 4 {Grim Lavamancer} 8 creatures 3 {Izzet Charm} 2 {Vapor Snag} 4 {Mana Leak} 2 {Spell Pierce} 4 {Lightning Bolt} 4 {Incinerate} 2 {Electrolyze} 4 {Gitaxian Probe} 4 {Serum Visions} 29 other spells Sideboard Notes: A budget UR Delver deck I am working on to help me get more into modern. Any advice appreciated, I AM actively trying to obtain snapcasters via trades, but it doesn't seem likely for me to get them. |
Korlashwrithe 60 cards, 0 sideboard 23 {Swamp} 23 lands 3 {Vampire Nighthawk} 4 {Korlash, Heir to Blackblade} 4 {Phyrexian Obliterator} 11 creatures 2 {Tendrils of Corruption} 1 {Consume the Meek} 2 {Go for the Throat} 2 {Dismember} 3 {Doom Blade} 2 {Despise} 3 {Duress} 3 {Sign in Blood} 4 {Wrench Mind} 4 {Lashwrithe} 26 other spells Sideboard Notes: Putting together this deck for a local modern tournament, don't know modern amazingly well, so any advice is appreciated! I really want to put {Thoughtsieze} in here, but alas, I don't have that kind of $ |
BUG Midrange 60 cards, 0 sideboard 4 {Drowned Catacomb} 3 {Watery Grave} 4 {Hinterland Harbor} 4 {Breeding Pool} 4 {Woodland Cemetery} 4 {Overgrown Tomb} 23 lands 2 {Snapcaster Mage} 4 {Elvish Visionary} 4 {Vampire Nighthawk} 3 {Desecration Demon} 2 {Consuming Aberration} 3 {Thragtusk} 18 creatures 3 {Ultimate Price} 2 {Devour Flesh} 4 {Farseek} 3 {Victim of Night} 2 {Jace, Memory Adept} 2 {Forbidden Alchemy} 3 {Abundant Growth} 19 other spells Sideboard Notes: Deck that I've been working on since GTC, performs rather well at FMM. Still trying to get down the sideboard. Does fairly well against the Aggro decks that are ever growing in popularity |
Quote from: FlickerYourOwnIdentity on January 13, 2013, 10:17:08 PMThis statement is so false. I play BR Aggro all the time, {Knight of Infamy} does wonders, it allows one drops to swing in for a bit more on turn 2, and pro-white goes a Long way
Knight of infamy needs to go, it's useless in this deck. Might I suggest {Rakdos Shred-Freak} in its place