Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - loop-s-pool

#1
Standard / Re: Nivmagus
April 12, 2013, 04:00:06 PM
{Hands of Binding} is a must have.
#2
Discussion / Re: Syncopate vs Dissipate
April 02, 2013, 11:39:01 AM
Quote from: Dudecore on April 01, 2013, 07:44:40 PM
{Syncopate} isn't good. If you're losing to early {Vampire Nighthawk} then you've gotta adjust something. Great counters are extinct.
And rightfully so, they make mtg less interactive and more about who reserves their spells till they're out of range.
#3
Standard / Re: Junk
April 02, 2013, 11:29:09 AM
Needs Garruk and {Sorin, Lord of Innistrad}. Also fog doesn't do anything for you in this deck. Go for sweepers. Think {Terminus} and {Mutilate}. {Farseek} and {Selesnya Keyrune} for acceleration. {Staff of Nin} for something up in that high mana bracket. Have you considered going Vampire-centric? Possibly 4x Nighthawk 2x Blood Artist 3x {Sorin, Lord of Innistrad} and 4x {Bloodline Keeper}.
#4
Standard / Re: Orzhov Obliteration
March 23, 2013, 01:05:01 PM
Why would {Thespian's Stage} belong in this deck?
#5
Standard / Re: {R}{W}{B}{U}FNM
March 17, 2013, 07:21:18 PM
This is expensivecards.dec I don't see any synergy between these cards.
#6
Combo Corner / [Synergy]Dryad and Cipher
March 16, 2013, 06:46:39 PM
 {Quirion Dryad} then lay down a {Hands of Binding}. Because the way cipher works, everytime you deal damage you are casting the spell again. Not only are you gaining board advantage, you're pumping you're Dryad.
#7
Standard / Re: Gyro Ball Gruul
March 16, 2013, 06:04:31 PM
Gruul aggro is most definetely not under the radar. This is a pretty standard shell with sage and savagery.
#8
Discussion / Re: Betrayal of trust
March 16, 2013, 04:54:51 PM
A good portion of the mtg community in a nutshell.
#9
Standard / Re: Vamps.
March 16, 2013, 11:42:34 AM
Mutilate seems awful in the sb with interaction to aristocrat.
#10
Standard / Re: All Creature Domri
March 16, 2013, 11:40:56 AM
But the Thalia/Domri interaction is atrocious. T2 Thalia means T4 Domri.
#11
Discussion / Re: M14 & Dual Lands
March 16, 2013, 01:54:20 AM
Quote from: KangaRod on March 11, 2013, 01:04:45 PM
Quote from: S717 on March 11, 2013, 11:57:13 AM
I want to see more stuff in the wedge colours (and not just lands)

I bet the next block will be big on the tri colour stuff

I'd be shocked seeing as how we've just come from a multicolor block.
#12
Standard / Re: Standrd B/W challage
March 15, 2013, 10:33:19 PM
Orzhov Aggro

75 cards, 15 sideboard


1 {Plains}
2 {Vault of the Archangel}
4 {Godless Shrine}
4 {Isolated Chapel}
3 {Cavern of Souls}
8 {Swamp}

22 lands


4 {Geralf's Messenger}
2 {Knight of Glory}
3 {Knight of Infamy}
4 {Blood Artist}
2 {Sublime Archangel}
4 {Doomed Traveler}
4 {Cartel Aristocrat}
4 {Gravecrawler}
3 {Skirsdag High Priest}

30 creatures


2 {Orzhov Charm}
4 {Lingering Souls}
2 {Altar's Reap}

8 other spells


Sideboard

1 {Knight of Infamy}
3 {Sorin, Lord of Innistrad}
2 {Obzedat, Ghost Council}
2 {Appetite for Brains}
3 {High Priest of Penance}
4 {Killing Wave}

15 sideboard cards


#13
Standard / Re: Red Aggro/burn
March 15, 2013, 09:36:03 PM
Seems really uninspired and bland. What was the purpose of posting this deck?
#14
Standard / Re: Boros Battalion (need help)
March 15, 2013, 06:41:16 PM
Quote from: loop-s-pool on March 15, 2013, 06:39:09 PM

Boros Battalion (need help)

75 cards, 15 sideboard


2 {Sacred Foundry}
10 {Plains}
11 {Mountain}

23 lands


3 {Frontline Medic}
3 {Boros Elite}
1 {Precinct Captain}
2 {Legion Loyalist}
1 {Firemane Avenger}
1 {Lightning Mauler}
4 {Spark Trooper}
3 {Hellrider}
2 {Silverblade Paladin}
2 {Ash Zealot}

22 creatures


1 {Fervor}
2 {Searing Spear}
1 {Ajani, Caller of the Pride}
4 {Boros Charm}
2 {Gather the Townsfolk}
2 {Mizzium Mortars}
1 {Chandra, the Firebrand}
1 {Assemble the Legion}
1 {Aurelia's Fury}

15 other spells


Sideboard

2 {Gather the Townsfolk}
4 {Wojek Halberdiers}
1 {Witchbane Orb}
2 {Firemane Avenger}
2 {Righteous Charge}
1 {Séance}
2 {Chandra, the Firebrand}
1 {Martial Glory}

15 sideboard cards



Notes:
I need help. I've been doing very poorly in every FNM so I am asking that on this and my other deck(Rotten Greens) if anyone can help and see what it is I am doing wrong with my deck building please. Ty.      This deck is designed to use the battalion ability and keep a large number of creatures on the bf. Cards like {Ajani, Caller of the Pride}, {Thraben Doomsayer}  , {Precinct Captain}, and {Increasing Devotion} are there to keep the Battalion going. The second part is to maintain a lot of haste using {Fervor}, { Hellrider} and many creatures with haste or soul bond to create haste, or Battalion.                       Chandra and some burn for direct damage and to try to limit opponent's blockers.   I will be adding 4 x {Spark Trooper} , 2x {Boros Elite} , and 2 more {Lightning Mauler} when I get them. Other cards are limited in number due to not having more (like {Ash Zealot} . Thanks for any time critiquing. I really need ideas and to find out why my deck making is so bad. At least I admit it lol.
I don't feel like deleting all the comments so I made the edits I would reccommend. Competetive magic costs money and that's all there is to it really.
#15
Standard / Re: Boros Battalion (need help)
March 15, 2013, 05:58:31 PM
This deck is really way too over the place to work. Chandra doesn't belong and neither does Fury. Fervor is plain bad because a creaure would be better 90% of the time. I think the reason this deck and the other are unsuccessful are because they're not aggro enough for aggro and not powerful enough for midrange.