iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: KangaRod on August 02, 2012, 03:29:14 AM

Title: Vamps
Post by: KangaRod on August 02, 2012, 03:29:14 AM

Vamps

60 cards, 0 sideboard


4 {Evolving Wilds}
2 {Cavern of Souls}
4 {Blackcleave Cliffs}
7 {Swamp}
4 {Dragonskull Summit}
1 {Mountain}

22 lands


4 {Bloodthrone Vampire}
3 {Vampire Nocturnus}
4 {Blood Artist}
4 {Vampire Nighthawk}
3 {Falkenrath Aristocrat}

18 creatures


4 {Tragic Slip}
4 {Distress}
4 {Sign in Blood}
4 {Duress}
4 {Murder}

20 other spells


Sideboard

Notes:
Just something I whipped up
Title: Re: Vamps
Post by: GoJuDragon on August 02, 2012, 03:49:46 AM
No nocturnus?
Title: Re: Vamps
Post by: Hunteroffire9 on August 08, 2012, 10:34:17 AM
Take out the evolving wilds it makes the deck slower and you already have inuf duel land
Title: Re: Vamps
Post by: Ghetto Pass on August 08, 2012, 11:43:28 PM
I agree you don't need the Evolving Wilds.  I feel you could get away without the Mountain as well.
Title: Re: Vamps
Post by: CajunJynx on August 09, 2012, 10:10:06 AM
Less stromkirk, more {bloodline keeper}.
Title: Re: Vamps
Post by: Thorn on August 09, 2012, 10:14:00 AM
{Olivia Voldaren}
and 1 or 2 {Dark Imposter}
He seems terrible but is actually very good.
Title: Re: Vamps
Post by: Kamikazekiel on August 14, 2012, 10:31:49 AM
I'd replace the aristocrats with bloodline keeper. But that may be just me.
Title: Re: Vamps
Post by: MaDeM MaD on August 14, 2012, 12:07:26 PM
As far as trying to kill quickly, aristocrat is much better than keeper. If your going towards more of a control  build than keeper for sure.
Title: Re: Vamps
Post by: Elite621 on August 14, 2012, 12:31:24 PM
How about just 2 evolving wilds. You don't want to draw two of them during a game, that would be awful.

Time for a side board. 3 of the Noble to give human decks an early target.
Title: Re: Vamps
Post by: MaDeM MaD on August 14, 2012, 06:25:22 PM
Wilds are not needed. You would a much better mana base w/o them
Title: Re: Vamps
Post by: ChrisRodriguez on August 14, 2012, 07:04:54 PM
What about {Olivia volderan} maybe as a 2 of.