Text only | Text with Images

iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: Closing Time on July 09, 2012, 08:50:19 AM

Title: GW Aggro
Post by: Closing Time on July 09, 2012, 08:50:19 AM

GW Aggro

71 cards, 11 sideboard


4 {Plains}
4 {Forest}
4 {Windswept Heath}
4 {Temple of Plenty}
4 {Blossoming Sands}
4 {Mana Confluence}
24 lands


4 {Soldier of the Pantheon}
4 {Fleecemane Lion}
4 {Ajani's Pridemate}
3 {Brimaz, King of Oreskos}
4 {Courser of Kruphix}
3 {Polukranos, World Eater}
3 {High Sentinels of Arashin}
3 {Wingmate Roc}
28 creatures


3 {Suspension Field}
3 {Banishing Light}
2 {Ajani Steadfast}
8 other spells


Sideboard

1 {Nyx-Fleece Ram}
1 {Eidolon of Countless Battles}
2 {Phyrexian Revoker}
1 {Banishing Light}
3 {Reclamation Sage}
3 {Hushwing Gryff}
11 sideboard cards


Notes:

Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: Closing Time on July 09, 2012, 08:51:59 AM
Any advice would be welcome. My main concern is its vulnerabililty to sweepers and possibly chump blocking.
Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: Jacetherican on July 09, 2012, 08:53:03 AM
Interesting
Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: Bear! on July 12, 2012, 01:25:52 PM
Strangleroot Geist + Rancor= Turn 2 4/1 with trample and undying. War falcon, while not amazing may slow down Delver enough for you to swing in.
Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: Dyray on July 12, 2012, 03:04:37 PM
You can always use ranger's guile as a cheap anti-target removal...
Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: Willthomjr on July 12, 2012, 10:32:53 PM
Quote from: Bear! on July 12, 2012, 01:25:52 PM
Strangleroot Geist + Rancor= Turn 2 4/1 with trample and undying. War falcon, while not amazing may slow down Delver enough for you to swing in.

Not possible with the deck list. He'd need 3 forest to pull that off and is running avacyns pilgrim instead of llanowar.
Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: Closing Time on September 29, 2014, 09:07:44 AM
Updated for Ktk Standard. Please ignore the sideboard. I considered going Abzan but think the mana base is too greedy, especially with the painlands.
Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: Thetrufflehunter on September 29, 2014, 09:15:19 AM
Quote from: Closing Time on September 29, 2014, 09:07:44 AM
Updated for Ktk Standard. Please ignore the sideboard. I considered going Abzan but think the mana base is too greedy, especially with the painlands.
Longest sellf bump in the history of self bumps :P looks good!
Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: Closing Time on September 29, 2014, 09:30:16 AM
Yeah ;). Must have had an old deck called the same thing!
Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: MuggyWuggy on September 29, 2014, 01:50:24 PM
I think some active tricks like gods willing and ajanis presence are key for the current meta removal.

1 mana for beat saving trick

Totally worth it
Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: MuggyWuggy on September 29, 2014, 01:50:52 PM
{eidolon of countless battles} also
Title: Re: GW Aggro
Post by: Alec Garst on September 30, 2014, 12:23:16 PM
{Sunblade elf} very good for a one drop and then turn two swing for two then drop a {fleecemane} for five power on the board. Also he helps to beef up your creatures later in the game
Text only | Text with Images