Does a creature returned from battlefield still have summoning sickness?
Quote from: Johng4490 on June 17, 2012, 04:12:03 PM
Does a creature returned from battlefield still have summoning sickness?
Yes
Cool cool just making sure.
You mean return from grave right?
That's what I was assuming. Lol
Man, graveborn decks would be even more OP lol. That would be insane!
That's why {urbrask, the hidden} is in my grave born deck. 😝
My friends response to him coming back is "KILL IT KILL IT KILL IT!!!"
Oops I did mean return from graveyard/to battlefield. I have yet to experience graveyard decks to any true power. Thus the uncertainty.
Any creature that enters the BF from anywhere will have summoning sickness.
Quote from: BlackJester on June 18, 2012, 12:29:06 AM
Any creature that enters the BF from anywhere will have summoning sickness.
including exile T.T
Quote from: BadLuckIrish on June 18, 2012, 12:29:44 AM
Quote from: BlackJester on June 18, 2012, 12:29:06 AM
Any creature that enters the BF from anywhere will have summoning sickness.
including exile T.T
Yea, unless it was cast by Suspend. Weird, yes.
Suspend doesn't? Maaaaaan that's a mistake I made today then.
Quote from: Johng4490 on June 18, 2012, 12:35:31 AM
Suspend doesn't? Maaaaaan that's a mistake I made today then.
If you remove the last suspend token from a creature and cast it that way, it doesn't have summoning sickness.
Quote from: BlackJester on June 18, 2012, 01:41:44 AM
Quote from: Johng4490 on June 18, 2012, 12:35:31 AM
Suspend doesn't? Maaaaaan that's a mistake I made today then.
If you remove the last suspend token from a creature and cast it that way, it doesn't have summoning sickness.
Well, it does sorta still have summoning sickness, it just gains haste :P I always use {Jhoira of the Ghitu} to remember suspend details, since the whole paragraph is printed on the card lol
You're right, I thought it didn't. It matters if you make a copy of the creature too.