is there anyway to get rid of a planeswalkers emblem?
Nope.
Only {Karn Liberated}s ultimate but that's bc of restarting a game
Quote from: Noblellama on August 27, 2015, 06:29:23 PM
Quote from: An Angry Fatman on August 27, 2015, 06:21:00 PM
is there anyway to get rid of a planeswalkers emblem?
Kill the player or use Karn's Ultimate...
Posting because I'm unsure. I know all players effects and abilities leave the game but what about the emblem from {Chandra, roaring flame}. She gives the emblem to the opponent you don't control it but do you own it? Ruling please. So if you lose but your opponents still have this emblem will it cease to exist. Thanks {{remillo}}.
Found this from gatherer.com
7/18/2014 The emblem is owned and controlled by the target of the ability that created it. In a multiplayer game, if Garruk's owner leaves the game, the emblem does not.
From {Garruk, apex predator}'s ability. Cheers!
Quote from: Noblellama on August 28, 2015, 12:58:59 PM
SO AN EMBLEM HANGS OUT EVEN ONCE THE PLAYER IS GONE!!??!?!???!!
mind blown...
I guess since it isn't a card you own you can walk away and leave "it" on the table...
wow
now I really want to multi-ulti the new Chandra and then concede in a multiplayer game..
yes, some people do just want to watch the world burn...
I have. Well i died while using her as a commander and continued watching. The guy that killed me lost cause he burned to death from it. The look he gave me afterward was pure poison. (Other guy left was a turbo fog deck so he just let the emblem do the work)
{sharahazad} is all I've got that hasn't been mentioned
Quote from: Kaalia with haste on August 28, 2015, 05:52:57 PM
{sharahazad} is all I've got that hasn't been mentioned
Sharazad has no effect on emblems.
10/4/2004: Events in a Shahrazad sub-game do not normally trigger abilities in the main game. And continuous effects in the main game do not carry over into the sub-game.
Quote from: rarehuntertay on August 28, 2015, 06:45:55 PM
Quote from: Kaalia with haste on August 28, 2015, 05:52:57 PM
{sharahazad} is all I've got that hasn't been mentioned
Sharazad has no effect on emblems.
10/4/2004: Events in a Shahrazad sub-game do not normally trigger abilities in the main game. And continuous effects in the main game do not carry over into the sub-game.
No emblem in the sub-game. When you resume, the emblem will be waiting.
EDIT: adding to the Garruk ruling:
113.2. (http://imtgapp.com/forum/index.php?action=imtg;area=rule;number=113.2.): An effect that creates an emblem is written "[Player] gets an emblem with [ability]." This means that [player] puts an emblem with [ability] into the command zone. The emblem is both owned and controlled by that player.
just want to chime in that oblivion rings can exile the emblem (non-land permanent) or anything that destroys or exiles permanent.
Quote from: Banquo814 on September 02, 2015, 12:30:53 AM
just want to chime in that oblivion rings can exile the emblem (non-land permanent) or anything that destroys or exiles permanent.
Next to the fact llama already stated, that emblems are not permanents, there are no cards that interact with cards in the command zone other then themselves, and that is the zone where the emblems are.
Permanents exist only on the battlefield.
Now would be an excellent time to restate that Emblems only exist as a reminder of effects that last until the end of the game. Emblems, as a game mechanic, exist as an easy way for players to keep track of effects that do not end. Take the original {Elspeth, Knight-Errant}. Her ultimate used to say "For the rest of the game", but now gives you an emblem to keep track of it.
There is no way to interact with emblems, as they just serve a as marker of a permanent effect, and nothing more.