iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Modern => Topic started by: Spencer Addington on May 31, 2015, 02:20:44 PM

Title: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on May 31, 2015, 02:20:44 PM

Waste Not

60 cards, 0 sideboard


1 {Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth}
4 {Bloodstained Mire}
4 {Blood Crypt}
2 {Dakmor Salvage}
3 {Blackcleave Cliffs}
4 {Swamp}
1 {Mountain}
1 {Buried Ruin}
2 {Graven Cairns}

22 lands


4 {Blightning}
4 {Inquisition of Kozilek}
4 {Thoughtseize}
3 {Raven's Crime}
4 {The Rack}
1 {Slaughter Pact}
2 {Kolaghan's Command}
4 {Liliana of the Veil}
4 {Shrieking Affliction}
4 {Ensnaring Bridge}
1 {Waste Not}
3 {Smallpox}

38 other spells


Sideboard
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on May 31, 2015, 02:21:47 PM
Need to cut 5-6
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Codester1991 on May 31, 2015, 03:18:33 PM
{Ravens crime} seems decent

But I'd cut blightning and kolaghan's command seeing as you have enough removal to take care of creatures and you're winning through the caress and waste nots. Also, kolaghan's command is better when you have creatures in the graveyard worth bringing back and bloodghast comes back each time you drop a land anyways
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: the_intelligentleman on May 31, 2015, 03:32:08 PM
Oh man Spence I love you so much for making this deck a thing.
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on May 31, 2015, 03:44:01 PM
Quote from: Codester1991 on May 31, 2015, 03:18:33 PM
{Ravens crime} seems decent

But I'd cut blightning and kolaghan's command seeing as you have enough removal to take care of creatures and you're winning through the caress and waste nots. Also, kolaghan's command is better when you have creatures in the graveyard worth bringing back and bloodghast comes back each time you drop a land anyways
I am really fond of blighting. With caress out it is 7 damage for 3 mana.
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on May 31, 2015, 03:45:28 PM
Changed it a bit to make it more 8rackish
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: NovusOrbis on May 31, 2015, 07:31:29 PM
Is {Rakdos' return} playable?
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on May 31, 2015, 09:21:20 PM
Still need to cut cards. I like {rakdos return}, but what to cut?
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on May 31, 2015, 09:22:24 PM
Quote from: Spencer Addington on May 31, 2015, 09:21:20 PM
Still need to cut cards. I like {rakdos return}, but what to cut?
*1
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Mattao19 on June 01, 2015, 05:56:27 PM
Caress doesn't seem good enough to me it seems too meh
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on June 01, 2015, 06:22:00 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on June 01, 2015, 05:56:27 PM
Caress doesn't seem good enough to me it seems too meh
Yeah, I was thinking about cutting it
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on June 05, 2015, 03:56:06 PM
Made it rackdo a 8rack. It seems to be the best she'll for waste not.
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on June 07, 2015, 04:58:48 AM
Re-arranged the list a bit. It is now a jund loam shell that runs waste not instead of seismic assault. I'll test out how it runs next Saturday 
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on June 09, 2015, 12:13:47 AM
Ok guys. I need some serious constructive criticism. I didn't bring the list(my lgs lets us proxy cards for modern events), and rolled with my abzan, but I really want to get this built.
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Saulon on June 09, 2015, 06:14:08 AM
 {Tarmogoyf} can be game winning,  {Crypt Incursion} is a card I like  {Blightning} is decent
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Saulon on June 09, 2015, 06:22:43 AM
I say you cut  {Flame Jab}  {Terminate} 1  {Eternal Witness} 1  {Waste Not} and add 4  {Tarmogoyf} or 4  {Dark Confidant}, I'm not a bid fan of confidant... I think you can add 3  {Rakdos Charm} or 3  {Obstinate Baloth} in the sideboard
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: LinkCelestrial on June 09, 2015, 03:15:06 PM
My honest opinion, I think you're pulling the deck in two different directions. It wants to be Loam Control and 8 Rack. I don't know if that works or not but it sounds like it might be a problem.

Basically I'm not sure if splashing green is worth it.
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Spencer Addington on June 14, 2015, 02:57:19 PM
You guys are right. Adding green was stretching the deck. I went with rakdos 8rack. I still like the thought of loam, but it just doesn't fit the deck.
Title: Re: Waste Not
Post by: Munchlax on June 15, 2015, 01:18:37 AM
I've found in my pox deck that that's pretty much how waste not was meant to be played