iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Modern => Topic started by: DimirOverlord1300 on March 16, 2015, 07:20:17 PM

Title: Modern Jund
Post by: DimirOverlord1300 on March 16, 2015, 07:20:17 PM

Modern Jund

75 cards, 15 sideboard


3 {Bloodstained Mire}
1 {Wooded Foothills}
1 {Twilight Mire}
2 {Overgrown Tomb}
2 {Raging Ravine}
2 {Treetop Village}
4 {Verdant Catacombs}
1 {Forest}
4 {Blackcleave Cliffs}
2 {Swamp}
1 {Blood Crypt}
1 {Stomping Ground}

24 lands


1 {Thundermaw Hellkite}
1 {Tasigur, the Golden Fang}
1 {Kitchen Finks}
4 {Tarmogoyf}
4 {Dark Confidant}
2 {Huntmaster of the Fells}
3 {Scavenging Ooze}

16 creatures


2 {Thoughtseize}
4 {Inquisition of Kozilek}
2 {Terminate}
4 {Liliana of the Veil}
3 {Abrupt Decay}
1 {Maelstrom Pulse}
4 {Lightning Bolt}

20 other spells


Sideboard

1 {Huntmaster of the Fells}
2 {Kitchen Finks}
1 {Thoughtseize}
1 {Shatterstorm}
1 {Duress}
1 {Olivia Voldaren}
1 {Ancient Grudge}
2 {Anger of the Gods}
4 {Fulminator Mage}
1 {Destructive Revelry}

15 sideboard cards



Notes:

Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: Kaalia with haste on March 16, 2015, 07:32:27 PM
I really hate playing tasi in the same deck as bob.. Then again I'm paranoid AF.
Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: DimirOverlord1300 on March 16, 2015, 07:33:28 PM
Quote from: Kaalia with haste on March 16, 2015, 07:32:27 PM
I really hate playing tasi in the same deck as bob.. Then again I'm paranoid AF.
I agree mostly, but most of the lists I've seen recently still have tasi as a one of. Imma try it I think.
Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: the_intelligentleman on March 16, 2015, 08:30:40 PM
Quote from: DimirOverlord1300 on March 16, 2015, 07:33:28 PM
Quote from: Kaalia with haste on March 16, 2015, 07:32:27 PM
I really hate playing tasi in the same deck as bob.. Then again I'm paranoid AF.
I agree mostly, but most of the lists I've seen recently still have tasi as a one of. Imma try it I think.
Soooo give me mine back?
Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: DimirOverlord1300 on March 16, 2015, 09:02:52 PM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on March 16, 2015, 08:30:40 PM
Quote from: DimirOverlord1300 on March 16, 2015, 07:33:28 PM
Quote from: Kaalia with haste on March 16, 2015, 07:32:27 PM
I really hate playing tasi in the same deck as bob.. Then again I'm paranoid AF.
I agree mostly, but most of the lists I've seen recently still have tasi as a one of. Imma try it I think.
Soooo give me mine back?
1. I already had 4 Elliott. I'm getting as many as I can.

2. Yours went in grixis delver

3. I'm just testing this. Might not work out.
Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: DimirOverlord1300 on March 17, 2015, 04:19:57 PM
What do people think about {Goblin Rabblemaster} here? I've seen him in legacy Jund before, think he'd be any good here? Generally Jund serves as the more aggressive brother of abzan, and I think rabble would add to that mentality. Thoughts? Also suggestions for what to cut for them?
Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: LinkCelestrial on March 17, 2015, 04:26:04 PM
Quote from: DimirOverlord1300 on March 17, 2015, 04:19:57 PM
What do people think about {Goblin Rabblemaster} here? I've seen him in legacy Jund before, think he'd be any good here? Generally Jund serves as the more aggressive brother of abzan, and I think rabble would add to that mentality. Thoughts? Also suggestions for what to cut for them?

I think no. Not a fan. I could be wrong though.
Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: Munchlax on March 17, 2015, 08:03:17 PM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on March 17, 2015, 04:26:04 PM
Quote from: DimirOverlord1300 on March 17, 2015, 04:19:57 PM
What do people think about {Goblin Rabblemaster} here? I've seen him in legacy Jund before, think he'd be any good here? Generally Jund serves as the more aggressive brother of abzan, and I think rabble would add to that mentality. Thoughts? Also suggestions for what to cut for them?

I think no. Not a fan. I could be wrong though.
Agreed. Rabble is just not good enough to be in an eternal format

"But munchy he makes little guys that attack for you"

So does Huntsmaster of the fells but Huntsmaster has two sides with relevant effects on both sides

"But munchy he's basically a {goblin piledriver}"

No he isn't. Goblin Piledriver is just marginally better than almost every modern legal goblin. What makes him especially relevant is pro blue. Rabble doesn't have pro anything. Rabble also only gets +1 instead of +2 to that attack.

"But munchy he's only three mana"

In your three slot you have things like {Maelstrom Pulse} and {Lilliana of the veil}. Those are all the three drops you need.

In other words the only reason rabble is being played in legacy is because it performed well in standard. Don't use it in here it's not good for your deck
Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: Kaalia with haste on March 17, 2015, 08:08:03 PM
Rabble dies to EVERYTHING. He seems like a good effect but he dies to bolt path electrolyze forked bolt maelstrom pulse flame slash and everything else. He's good against Lili but that's about it. And he's only good against Lili if the person playing Lili doesn't have a tarmogoyf or tasigur or whatever out to eat rabble.
Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: DimirOverlord1300 on March 17, 2015, 08:30:03 PM
I know, but he still seems pretty solid. Idk I think I want to test him at least
Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: Munchlax on March 17, 2015, 09:05:15 PM
Quote from: DimirOverlord1300 on March 17, 2015, 08:30:03 PM
I know, but he still seems pretty solid. Idk I think I want to test him at least
He's not good though. The deck is super solid as it is so why put in a card that died to everything?
Title: Re: Modern Jund
Post by: DimirOverlord1300 on March 18, 2015, 09:18:43 AM
Quote from: Munchlax on March 17, 2015, 09:05:15 PM
Quote from: DimirOverlord1300 on March 17, 2015, 08:30:03 PM
I know, but he still seems pretty solid. Idk I think I want to test him at least
He's not good though. The deck is super solid as it is so why put in a card that died to everything?
Because I want to try it...? I recognize that it might not work, but it seems worth a test.