iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Standard => Topic started by: Mattao19 on January 27, 2015, 12:54:36 PM

Title: UW Control
Post by: Mattao19 on January 27, 2015, 12:54:36 PM
5 {Island}
2 {Plains}
2 {Evolving Wilds}
4 {Flooded Strand}
2 {Polluted Delta}
4 {Radiant Fountain}
4 {Temple of Enlightenment}
4 {Tranquil Cove}
27 lands

3 {Banishing Light}
3 {Elspeth, Sun's Champion}

1 {Pearl Lake Ancient}

2 {Devouring Light}
3 {Dig Through Time}
2 {Disdainful Stroke}
4 {Dissolve}
3 {Jace's Ingenuity}
1 {Last Breath}
4 {Nullify}
2 {Divination}
3 {End Hostilities}
1 {AEtherspouts}
1 {Fated Retribution}

This is Jim Davis' list I just swapped Grindclock for PLA as a trial.
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: Mattao19 on January 27, 2015, 02:59:52 PM
I know I hate PLA but Grindclock is actually better vs GY strats IMO it's a way for me to control them more. I don't just do it for 3 I let it tick up and up and hit them for 6+ plus the delve spells I care about are precisely 1 DTT but I don't even mind them digging bc it helps mill lol. Now with Ugin in the format most ppl will be going to 1 or 0 PLA and running Ugin this is perfect bc Ugin is easy to deal with and ugins -X doesn't even hit GC! :P Idk I get what you're saying but for the time being I'll test with GC the only thing that scares me is Whip but they rarely resolve it
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: Mattao19 on January 27, 2015, 04:55:32 PM
Mastery seems pretty sweet SB tech vs control!
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: Mattao19 on February 28, 2015, 08:31:35 AM
Bump for link
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: LinkCelestrial on February 28, 2015, 02:16:33 PM
Looks pretty solid. Four {Nullify} seems a bit excessive. As does three {Elspeth, Suns Champion}. I'd think that {Perilous Vault} would slit in over {Fated Retribution}. What made you pick U/W over U/B? I really want to make Esper work. Also can I see a sideboard?
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: Mattao19 on February 28, 2015, 02:35:52 PM
4 {Nullify} is a meta game call but is great this deck is not good vs early critters so having a T2 Nullify for that lion is great.

Vault can't be played bc you play 3 Lights

3 Elspeth can easily be 2 Elspeth 1 {Resolute Archangel}

I have found that UW is just better your win cons are miles ahead of UB like Elspeth > Silumgar. But UB is still sweet and I guess it's preference but I just like UW
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: LinkCelestrial on February 28, 2015, 05:51:25 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on February 28, 2015, 02:35:52 PM
4 {Nullify} is a meta game call but is great this deck is not good vs early critters so having a T2 Nullify for that lion is great.

Vault can't be played bc you play 3 Lights

3 Elspeth can easily be 2 Elspeth 1 {Resolute Archangel}

I have found that UW is just better your win cons are miles ahead of UB like Elspeth > Silumgar. But UB is still sweet and I guess it's preference but I just like UW

Gotcha. My Mono Blue list runs two but has two more in sideboard just in case.

Makes sense about the vaults and the lights.

I'd probably go that way.

I really like access to {Banishing Light}. I think I'm gonna cook up an Esper list because I just like too many cards...
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: Mattao19 on February 28, 2015, 07:55:39 PM
NO!!!! Lol don't do Esper the mana is sooooooo bad and it's not as strong as UW or UB both decks have answers to everything don't get greedy and try both bc it's not good
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: LinkCelestrial on February 28, 2015, 07:59:45 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on February 28, 2015, 07:55:39 PM
NO!!!! Lol don't do Esper the mana is sooooooo bad and it's not as strong as UW or UB both decks have answers to everything don't get greedy and try both bc it's not good

{Evolving Wilds} is my Tri and I have temples and fetches. Gain lands too if I'm feeling adventurous.
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: Mattao19 on February 28, 2015, 09:44:08 PM
Reason why it's not good and why E Wilds isn't good enough is bc you want BB for downfall on 3 WW for End on 5 and UU for dissolve at all times. Also tap lands hurt more than they help bc you want to stop their early turns. :P
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: LinkCelestrial on February 28, 2015, 11:29:43 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on February 28, 2015, 09:44:08 PM
Reason why it's not good and why E Wilds isn't good enough is bc you want BB for downfall on 3 WW for End on 5 and UU for dissolve at all times. Also tap lands hurt more than they help bc you want to stop their early turns. :P

True...eh. I just really like Esper.
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: Mattao19 on February 28, 2015, 11:53:28 PM
I know man Esper is my favourite colour combo too but it's just not worth it :(
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: LinkCelestrial on March 01, 2015, 09:28:25 PM
Quote from: Mattao19 on February 28, 2015, 11:53:28 PM
I know man Esper is my favourite colour combo too but it's just not worth it :(

I'm a Grixis person. But Esper is second.
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: Mattao19 on March 03, 2015, 10:38:15 AM
I agree Bravado :P Res. Arch. deserves a MB slot I just haven't found the room yet
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: the_intelligentleman on March 03, 2015, 12:11:10 PM
OHHH THIS DECK JUST GOT SOO MUCH BETTER
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: Vindog on March 03, 2015, 04:36:09 PM
Take out an elspeth for angel
Title: Re: UW Control
Post by: Mattao19 on March 03, 2015, 06:12:33 PM
Vin that's what most are doing but idk I'm testing both and so far I like Elspeth better but I need to test more :P the list that Top 8ed Houston took out an Elspeth for it so maybe it's correct but I'll have to test! :D

Intelligent it got better with Purge as a SB card Command is not going in here I don't think