iMtG Server: Gathering

Decks (Magic The Gathering) => Modern => Topic started by: Z5 on January 22, 2015, 10:53:35 PM

Title: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Z5 on January 22, 2015, 10:53:35 PM

Bouncey N. Goats

60 cards, 0 sideboard


5 {Plains}
4 {Island}
3 {Mountain}
3 {Vivid Meadow}
2 {Springjack Pasture}
2 {Vivid Creek}
1 {Flooded Strand}

20 lands


4 {Springjack Shepherd}
2 {Solemn Simulacrum}
4 {Augury Owl}
2 {Omenspeaker}
4 {Soul's Attendant}

16 creatures


4 {Cathars' Crusade}
3 {Ghostly Flicker}
2 {Oblivion Ring}
3 {Legion's Initiative}
3 {Intangible Virtue}
2 {Teleportal}
4 {Cloudshift}
3 {Faithless Looting}

24 other spells


Sideboard
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Z5 on January 22, 2015, 10:54:38 PM
This is an update of my last version, I need some help (not too expensive) filling the last two slots.
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: the_intelligentleman on January 23, 2015, 07:52:02 AM
Seems like you need some more white mana symbols in your permanents.
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Cender on January 23, 2015, 07:59:46 AM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on January 23, 2015, 07:52:02 AM
Seems like you need some more white mana symbols in your permanents.

He's right on the spot here. Your chroma count will be on average, 1.6(ish) I'd consolidate your mama base into white plus light splash. Is it worth having {Teleportal} unblockable Goats when you can instead {Cathars Crusade} them into wrecking balls with Chroma synergy?
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: cltrn81 on January 23, 2015, 08:44:09 AM
Instead of red why not add anthem effects like {honor of the pure}?
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 10:09:57 AM
Because of the synergy of legions initiative.
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 10:10:55 AM
Quote from: Cender on January 23, 2015, 07:59:46 AM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on January 23, 2015, 07:52:02 AM
Seems like you need some more white mana symbols in your permanents.

He's right on the spot here. Your chroma count will be on average, 1.6(ish) I'd consolidate your mama base into white plus light splash. Is it worth having {Teleportal} unblockable Goats when you can instead {Cathars Crusade} them into wrecking balls with Chroma synergy?
Yes it is believe it ir not that is about 1/2 my wins.
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 10:27:05 AM
i am thinking about {grand abolisher}, {archangel of thune} and {knight of the white orchard}
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Munchlax on January 23, 2015, 12:01:57 PM
Quote from: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 10:10:55 AM
Quote from: Cender on January 23, 2015, 07:59:46 AM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on January 23, 2015, 07:52:02 AM
Seems like you need some more white mana symbols in your permanents.

He's right on the spot here. Your chroma count will be on average, 1.6(ish) I'd consolidate your mama base into white plus light splash. Is it worth having {Teleportal} unblockable Goats when you can instead {Cathars Crusade} them into wrecking balls with Chroma synergy?
Yes it is believe it ir not that is about 1/2 my wins.
But how often do you win and against what decks?
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Cender on January 23, 2015, 12:32:02 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on January 23, 2015, 12:01:57 PM
Quote from: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 10:10:55 AM
Quote from: Cender on January 23, 2015, 07:59:46 AM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on January 23, 2015, 07:52:02 AM
Seems like you need some more white mana symbols in your permanents.

He's right on the spot here. Your chroma count will be on average, 1.6(ish) I'd consolidate your mama base into white plus light splash. Is it worth having {Teleportal} unblockable Goats when you can instead {Cathars Crusade} them into wrecking balls with Chroma synergy?
Yes it is believe it ir not that is about 1/2 my wins.
But how often do you win and against what decks?

Munchlax is on the spot here as well. +1.

The hidden portion of your sentence is: "...as it is built right now."

I look at your deck and see:
One fetch land.
6 vivid lands.
A high percentage of top deck "wrong" lands.

Ask yourself: how many games have been lost to color screw and/or being too slow? Now, compare that to your {Teleportal} wins.

If you really think keeping it is vital to your deck, then my main suggestion is to fortify your mana base with fetches and shocks. It isn't probably what you want to hear. Which is why I suggested the previous alternative: minimize your color dependencies.
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Munchlax on January 23, 2015, 03:27:27 PM
Maybe consider replacing the springjack Shepard with something like {Stonehorn Dignitary}
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: NovusOrbis on January 23, 2015, 04:16:04 PM
{Boros Reckonet} for the white devotion.
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Cender on January 23, 2015, 05:08:40 PM
Quote from: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 10:09:57 AM
Because of the synergy of legions initiative.

You also mentioned synergy with {Legions Initiative}, however you also have negative synergy. All your tokens get exiled and cease to exist. Sure, you get more provided the shepherd comes back into play. It's still a risk.
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 06:42:23 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on January 23, 2015, 03:27:27 PM
Maybe consider replacing the springjack Shepard with something like {Stonehorn Dignitary}
Why?
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 06:46:59 PM
Quote from: Cender on January 23, 2015, 12:32:02 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on January 23, 2015, 12:01:57 PM
Quote from: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 10:10:55 AM
Quote from: Cender on January 23, 2015, 07:59:46 AM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on January 23, 2015, 07:52:02 AM
Seems like you need some more white mana symbols in your permanents.

He's right on the spot here. Your chroma count will be on average, 1.6(ish) I'd consolidate your mama base into white plus light splash. Is it worth having {Teleportal} unblockable Goats when you can instead {Cathars Crusade} them into wrecking balls with Chroma synergy?
Yes it is believe it ir not that is about 1/2 my wins.
But how often do you win and against what decks?

Munchlax is on the spot here as well. +1.

The hidden portion of your sentence is: "...as it is built right now."

I look at your deck and see:
One fetch land.
6 vivid lands.
A high percentage of top deck "wrong" lands.

Ask yourself: how many games have been lost to color screw and/or being too slow? Now, compare that to your {Teleportal} wins.

If you really think keeping it is vital to your deck, then my main suggestion is to fortify your mana base with fetches and shocks. It isn't probably what you want to hear. Which is why I suggested the previous alternative: minimize your color dependencies.
Its a great idea, I have been experimenting but this design works fine, we are mostly using cards in our own collections eg. the single fetch. Also my deck wins 3/4 of the time against my friends brews (scape, goblin combo, dragonshift)
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 06:50:20 PM
Quote from: Cender on January 23, 2015, 05:08:40 PM
Quote from: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 10:09:57 AM
Because of the synergy of legions initiative.

You also mentioned synergy with {Legions Initiative}, however you also have negative synergy. All your tokens get exiled and cease to exist. Sure, you get more provided the shepherd comes back into play. It's still a risk.
You are 100% correct, this is why I cut it down to three, but it usually has a such a big inpact that the negative synergy is almost nonexistent.
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Munchlax on January 23, 2015, 10:24:56 PM
Quote from: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 06:46:59 PM
Quote from: Cender on January 23, 2015, 12:32:02 PM
Quote from: Munchlax on January 23, 2015, 12:01:57 PM
Quote from: Z5 on January 23, 2015, 10:10:55 AM
Quote from: Cender on January 23, 2015, 07:59:46 AM
Quote from: the_intelligentleman on January 23, 2015, 07:52:02 AM
Seems like you need some more white mana symbols in your permanents.

He's right on the spot here. Your chroma count will be on average, 1.6(ish) I'd consolidate your mama base into white plus light splash. Is it worth having {Teleportal} unblockable Goats when you can instead {Cathars Crusade} them into wrecking balls with Chroma synergy?
Yes it is believe it ir not that is about 1/2 my wins.
But how often do you win and against what decks?

Munchlax is on the spot here as well. +1.

The hidden portion of your sentence is: "...as it is built right now."

I look at your deck and see:
One fetch land.
6 vivid lands.
A high percentage of top deck "wrong" lands.

Ask yourself: how many games have been lost to color screw and/or being too slow? Now, compare that to your {Teleportal} wins.

If you really think keeping it is vital to your deck, then my main suggestion is to fortify your mana base with fetches and shocks. It isn't probably what you want to hear. Which is why I suggested the previous alternative: minimize your color dependencies.
Its a great idea, I have been experimenting but this design works fine, we are mostly using cards in our own collections eg. the single fetch. Also my deck wins 3/4 of the time against my friends brews (scape, goblin combo, dragonshift)
But those are your friends deck which makes that a casual meta, not competitive. You should have told us this before.
Title: Re: Bouncey N. Goats
Post by: Z5 on January 24, 2015, 01:33:57 AM
Oh sorry, I assumed u knew because of the title and stratagy.