iMtG Server: Gathering

Green/White 60 cards, 0 sideboard 8 {Forest} 1 {Forest} 1 {Evolving Wilds} 9 {Plains} 19 lands 1 {Armada Wurm} 1 {Dawnbringer Charioteers} 1 {Griffin Protector} 2 {Avacyn's Pilgrim} 2 {Elvish Mystic} 1 {Cathedral Sanctifier} 1 {Phalanx Leader} 1 {Anthousa, Setessan Hero} 1 {Deadly Recluse} 1 {Scuttling Doom Engine} 2 {Wingsteed Rider} 1 {Thraben Valiant} 1 {Timberland Guide} 1 {Sunblade Elf} 1 {Cavalry Pegasus} 1 {Hamlet Captain} 19 creatures 1 {Giant Growth} 1 {Giant Growth} 1 {Bountiful Harvest} 4 {Bonds of Faith} 1 {Awaken the Bear} 2 {Divine Verdict} 2 {Dauntless Onslaught} 1 {Serpent's Gift} 1 {Feed the Clan} 1 {Shredding Winds} 1 {Fog} 1 {Haunted Plate Mail} 1 {Titanic Growth} 2 {Pacifism} 2 {Pacifism} 22 other spells Sideboard Notes: kind of aggro/kind of life-gain

You need to pick cards that you like and make them a 4 of you need to cut down on the 1-2 ofs bc it makes the deck less consistent.

How do you normally win? By beating down fast? Then have cheap efficient creatures like {Strangleroot Geist}

Should be moved to casual

Quote from: Kaalia with haste on December 06, 2014, 09:03:49 AM
Should be moved to casual

Because you know best?  People should realize how rude this is on this forum.

~just sayin

I hear ya Cltrn but some ppl come to the modern forum to see new ideas on decks that can hold their own. Having said that I do agree with you it's very rude. That's why I just offer advice :D

Quote from: cltrn81 on December 06, 2014, 09:07:34 AM

Quote from: Kaalia with haste on December 06, 2014, 09:03:49 AM
Should be moved to casual

Because you know best?  People should realize how rude this is on this forum.

~just sayin

I personally disagree with you here. Sometimes people get a misunderstanding about where their deck should be placed and it has been said before that the modern section is for competitive decks. Now in mine (and probably yours too) I don't think half the cards on here have ever been competitive

"Should be moved to casual" lacks tac and respect.  That comment and 90% of these are rude comments.

"Hey <insert name>, I notice you are new to the forum.  Typically this area is for posting competitive <insert format> decks and this decks seems like it may be more of a casual deck.  Did you want some suggestions on making this competitive?"  This is ok and should be done more often then the easy one liner people give to new users who post these types of decks.

At the end of the day an unpopular deck will generate low comments and fall to the bottom anyway.

Quote from: cltrn81 on December 06, 2014, 10:09:52 AM
"Should be moved to casual" lacks tac and respect.  That comment and 90% of these are rude comments.

"Hey <insert name>, I notice you are new to the forum.  Typically this area is for posting competitive <insert format> decks and this decks seems like it may be more of a casual deck.  Did you want some suggestions on making this competitive?"  This is ok and should be done more often then the easy one liner people give to new users who post these types of decks.

At the end of the day an unpopular deck will generate low comments and fall to the bottom anyway.

My bad. I feel ya cltrn. I'll keep that in mind for the future. I stand by the idea though.

Quote from: Kaalia with haste on December 06, 2014, 10:37:43 AM

Quote from: cltrn81 on December 06, 2014, 10:09:52 AM
"Should be moved to casual" lacks tac and respect.  That comment and 90% of these are rude comments.

"Hey <insert name>, I notice you are new to the forum.  Typically this area is for posting competitive <insert format> decks and this decks seems like it may be more of a casual deck.  Did you want some suggestions on making this competitive?"  This is ok and should be done more often then the easy one liner people give to new users who post these types of decks.

At the end of the day an unpopular deck will generate low comments and fall to the bottom anyway.

My bad. I feel ya cltrn. I'll keep that in mind for the future. I stand by the idea though.

+1
Thanks for understanding and accepting the criticism.