iMtG Server: Gathering

The Night Pack 65 cards, 0 sideboard 20 {Forest} 20 lands 4 {Timberpack Wolf} 4 {Wandering Wolf} 4 {Briarpack Alpha} 4 {Sacred Wolf} 4 {Darkthicket Wolf} 4 {Young Wolf} 24 creatures 4 {Bountiful Harvest} 1 {Boundless Realms} 4 {Overrun} 4 {Howl of the Night Pack} 4 {Raised by Wolves} 4 {Rampant Growth} 21 other spells Sideboard Notes: Would love to add Master of the Wild Hunt

This should really be moved to Casual

Why? It's mono green and has sets that are under Modern.

What he means by that is this deck doesn't compete very well against top tier modern decks and is more a casual deck

That sucks. It seems that none of my decks are very good...

{master of the wild hunt}

Quote from: TreeSmoker on June 22, 2014, 02:57:15 AM
Ignore these people. They actually have no say in what is competitive or not. If it has modern legal cards it's a modern deck. If it has legacy legal cards it's a legacy deck. If it was alpha and stuff then it would be casual. You get what I'm saying. This community has fallen apart and would be nice for it to come back together again.

I have to disagree. Why not just post everything under vintage then, and leave the decks with playsets of restricted cards to casual? There's a reason for the different sections. I don't think these people are being mean or the community has "fallen apart," they just giving their opinion about how well this would stand up to a competitive tier 1 modern deck like one you'd see winning a GP.

Also, if you're a mod who can move threads, you definitely have a say if it's casual or modern. ;)

Quote from: TreeSmoker on June 22, 2014, 02:57:15 AM
Ignore these people. They actually have no say in what is competitive or not. If it has modern legal cards it's a modern deck. If it has legacy legal cards it's a legacy deck. If it was alpha and stuff then it would be casual. You get what I'm saying. This community has fallen apart and would be nice for it to come back together again.

The community has hardly fallen apart if people think a section should only be for competitive decks :P the problem seems to be that you over analyze what others say.

Quote from: E.kann1 on June 22, 2014, 09:30:06 AM

Quote from: TreeSmoker on June 22, 2014, 02:57:15 AM
Ignore these people. They actually have no say in what is competitive or not. If it has modern legal cards it's a modern deck. If it has legacy legal cards it's a legacy deck. If it was alpha and stuff then it would be casual. You get what I'm saying. This community has fallen apart and would be nice for it to come back together again.

I have to disagree. Why not just post everything under vintage then, and leave the decks with playsets of restricted cards to casual? There's a reason for the different sections. I don't think these people are being mean or the community has "fallen apart," they just giving their opinion about how well this would stand up to a competitive tier 1 modern deck like one you'd see winning a GP.

Also, if you're a mod who can move threads, you definitely have a say if it's casual or modern. ;)

This

Quote from: Ryggrad82 on June 22, 2014, 02:02:10 AM
That sucks. It seems that none of my decks are very good...

That's not true. It's just that when you post them under Modern people compare them to the best modern decks (which are very good). If you posted this in casual where the opponent's deck is assumed to be less powerful, then your decks aren't as bad as some people say.

Modern deck construction doesn't mention having to stack up against T1 decks.

Then, again, what is the logical point of having a casual section? If you say for decks with 4 {black lotus}, look at it and see how many decks have that.

Quote from: Ryggrad82 on June 22, 2014, 09:32:36 AM
Modern deck construction doesn't mention having to stack up against T1 decks.

So? What would this beat? Other casual decks. Look at all the other modern decks here. Then look at what you have

Quote from: Munchlax on June 22, 2014, 09:34:58 AM

Quote from: Ryggrad82 on June 22, 2014, 09:32:36 AM
Modern deck construction doesn't mention having to stack up against T1 decks.

So? What would this beat? Other casual decks. Look at all the other modern decks here. Then look at what you have

A lot of not T1 decks. It may beat U Tron or rack, even.

I guess I should expect this kind of thing, seeing as I'm actually not that competitive when it comes to Magic. I just love the game, not winning.

Right! That's fine, but is more of a casual kind if play. Modern is usually assumed to be more competitive, so maybe it would be better to just stick to casual. Nothing wrong with that.

Quote from: Ryggrad82 on June 22, 2014, 02:02:10 AM
That sucks. It seems that none of my decks are very good...

Quote from: Ryggrad82 on June 22, 2014, 09:39:21 AM
I guess I should expect this kind of thing, seeing as I'm actually not that competitive when it comes to Magic. I just love the game, not winning.

First off it takes time and a decent amount of cards to make a good deck. Also playing and seeing the interaction of the cards help.

My best suggestion is to focus on one deck. This way you can learns the ins and outs of it.

You should also find a deck or play style you like and build a deck from there. You can also find lists online of decks and build them from cards you have. Then you can replace expensive card with proxies or ther cards. For instance if you can't afford  {Noble Hierarch} you can use  {Birds of Paradise}. You also don't have to use fetch lands because of their costs. Eventually you will upgrade your deck to amazballs status and kick everyone's ass :P

Quote from: cltrn81 on June 22, 2014, 08:54:01 AM
{master of the wild hunt}

See notes. :)