Exalted Auras 60 cards, 0 sideboard 2 {Hallowed Fountain} 2 {Plains} 2 {Marsh Flats} 1 {Breeding Pool} 2 {Verdant Catacombs} 2 {Misty Rainforest} 2 {Island} 3 {Forest} 3 {Temple Garden} 1 {Horizon Canopy} 20 lands 4 {Kor Spiritdancer} 1 {Rafiq of the Many} 1 {Qasali Pridemage} 3 {Noble Hierarch} 2 {Knight of Glory} 3 {Geist of Saint Traft} 3 {Invisible Stalker} 17 creatures 4 {Gelid Shackles} 4 {Rancor} 2 {Hyena Umbra} 3 {Unflinching Courage} 4 {Daybreak Coronet} 2 {Spider Umbra} 4 {Ethereal Armor} 23 other spells Sideboard |
Quote from: Sparkle Ninja on April 29, 2014, 07:02:10 PMOhh yea forgot about that guy. Will need to splash more blue than just the hierarches tho.....but feasible
{Rafiq of the many}? Maybe play test it?
Quote from: DeathlyFoiend on May 01, 2014, 08:20:03 AMThanks for the input and incite. I agree it would be better off with more hexproof. This is a bit of a mix between Maverick and Auras. The exalted really gets out of hard very quickly tho......so the trick is I either drop the exalted guys for hexproof guys.....it's a trade off for sure. I will give your suggestions some thought and see what I come up with.
This is weaker than Bogles due to the run of creatures and lack of disruption. Adding a third color seems cloggy.
This deck is trying to be two things at once while not supporting each other well enough. They compliment, but don't highlight themselves.
I would go Bant because of Geist of Saint Traft and cards like Mana Leak/Path. Run more manadorks because Turn 2 is important to cast a turn 3 card in Bant.
If you're going with Hexproof, keep it to two colors. Green and white. It has better forms of early hexproof and the ability to work with auras better than most cards. Since the deck is inconsistent without a mulligan, having only 2 colors keeps it consistent with Horizon Canopy card advantage.